Literature DB >> 16854669

Airborne exposure limits for chemical and biological warfare agents: is everything set and clear?

Alex Sabelnikov1, Vladimir Zhukov, C Ruth Kempf.   

Abstract

Emergency response strategies (guidelines) for biological, chemical, nuclear, or radiological terrorist events should be based on scientifically established exposure limits for all the agents or materials involved. In the case of a radiological terrorist event, emergency response guidelines (ERG) have been worked out. In the case of a terrorist event with the use of chemical warfare (CW) agents the situation is not that clear, though the new guidelines and clean-up values are being generated based on re-evaluation of toxicological and risk data. For biological warfare (BW) agents, such guidelines do not yet exist. In this paper the current status of airborne exposure limits (AELs) for chemical and biological warfare (CBW) agents are reviewed. Particular emphasis is put on BW agents that lack such data. An efficient, temporary solution to bridge the gap in experimental infectious data and to set provisional AELs for BW agents is suggested. It is based on mathematically generated risks of infection for BW agents grouped by their alleged ID50 values in three categories: with low, intermediate and high ID50 values.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16854669     DOI: 10.1080/09603120600734105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Health Res        ISSN: 0960-3123            Impact factor:   3.411


  1 in total

1.  Prioritizing risks and uncertainties from intentional release of selected Category A pathogens.

Authors:  Tao Hong; Patrick L Gurian; Yin Huang; Charles N Haas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.