Literature DB >> 16854456

CD105 expression is an independent predictor of survival in patients with endometrial cancer.

Ozlem Erdem1, Cagatay Taskiran, M Anil Onan, Mehmet Erdem, Haldun Guner, Omur Ataoglu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to detect the prognostic value of CD105 (endoglin) and also to compare with CD34 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in patients with endometrial adenocancer.
METHODS: Ninety patients with endometrial carcinoma, who were treated at Gazi University Hospital, were included. Staging was performed according to the FIGO recommendations. Angiogenesis was estimated by using CD105 and CD34 and tested for possible significant relation with age, stage, histologic type, grade, depth of myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, lymph node metastasis, and overall survival (OS). In addition, VEGF staining intensity and distribution were analyzed with respect to all these variables.
RESULTS: The mean age at the time of diagnosis was 57.7 years (range, 28-81 years). The mean microvessel density (MVD) for CD105 was 32.87+/-19.99, and it was 55.46+/-31.25 for CD34 (P<0.001). A significant correlation was noted between these two markers (r=0.257, P=0.02). The mean VEGF score was 4.13+/-1.73, and it was significantly correlated with MV counts determined by CD105 (r=0.291, P=0.006). It was not significantly related with CD34 (r=0.031, P=0.78). With respect to clinicopathological variables, none of the comparisons was found to be significant. The mean follow-up period was 60.5 months. To analyze the prognostic value of MVD, the patients were divided into three groups with respect to quartiles (<or=25%, 26-74%, and >or=75%). With CD105 staining, the 5-year OS rates for patients with the highest MVD count (>or=75%) were significantly poorer than the remaining two groups (P=0.01 for both). None of the comparisons for CD34 was significant. Survival analysis for VEGF was performed by grouping patients using staining characteristics. No significant difference was noted for OS. Multivariate analysis showed that MVD determined by CD105 correlated significantly and independently with OS (P=0.02). None of the remaining variables was significant in multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: The current study showed that CD105 is an independent predictor of survival in patients with endometrial cancer. We recommend the use of this highly specific and prognosis-related antigen in further investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16854456     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  15 in total

Review 1.  Endoglin-targeted cancer therapy.

Authors:  Ben K Seon; Akinao Haba; Fumihiko Matsuno; Norihiko Takahashi; Masanori Tsujie; Xinwei She; Naoko Harada; Shima Uneda; Tomoko Tsujie; Hirofumi Toi; Hilda Tsai; Yuro Haruta
Journal:  Curr Drug Deliv       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  An open-label phase Ib dose-escalation study of TRC105 (anti-endoglin antibody) with bevacizumab in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Michael S Gordon; Francisco Robert; Daniela Matei; David S Mendelson; Jonathan W Goldman; E Gabriela Chiorean; Robert M Strother; Ben K Seon; William D Figg; Cody J Peer; Delia Alvarez; Bonne J Adams; Charles P Theuer; Lee S Rosen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Endoglin for targeted cancer treatment.

Authors:  Lee S Rosen; Michael S Gordon; Francisco Robert; Daniela E Matei
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Soluble CD105 is prognostic of disease recurrence in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Veronica R Placencio-Hickok; Anisha Madhav; Sungjin Kim; Frank Duong; Bryan Angara; Zhenqiu Liu; Neil A Bhowmick
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 5.678

5.  Expression of Endoglin (CD-105) and Microvessel Density in Oral Dysplasia and Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Maharudrappa Basnaker; Shashikanth Sr; Satish Bnvs
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-09-20

6.  Endoglin, VEGF, and its receptors in predicting metastases in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Sami K Saarelainen; Synnöve Staff; Nina Peltonen; Terho Lehtimäki; Jorma Isola; Paula M Kujala; Maarit H Vuento; Johanna U Mäenpää
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-01-14

7.  Correlation of matrix metalloproteinase suppressor genes RECK, VEGF, and CD105 with angiogenesis and biological behavior in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Sheng-Lei Li; Dong-Ling Gao; Zhi-Hua Zhao; Zong-Wen Liu; Qiu-Min Zhao; Jin-Xia Yu; Kui-Sheng Chen; Yun-Han Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Blood vessel maturation in human uveal melanoma: spatial distribution of neovessels and mature vasculature.

Authors:  Yolanda Piña; Colleen M Cebulla; Timothy G Murray; Armando Alegret; Sander R Dubovy; Hinda Boutrid; William Feuer; Lejla Mutapcic; Maria-Elena Jockovich
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 2.892

9.  Role of platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) over-expression and angiogenesis in ependymoma.

Authors:  Lucas Moreno; Sergey Popov; Alexa Jury; Saffa Al Sarraj; Chris Jones; Stergios Zacharoulis
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Clinical Results and Biomarker Analyses of Axitinib and TRC105 versus Axitinib Alone in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (TRAXAR).

Authors:  Toni K Choueiri; Yousef Zakharia; Sumanta Pal; Judit Kocsis; Russell Pachynski; Alexandr Poprach; Andrew B Nixon; Yingmiao Liu; Mark Starr; Jing Lyu; Kouros Owzar; Mollie deShazo; Primo Lara; Lajos Geczi; Thai H Ho; Meghara Walsh; Bonne Adams; Liz Robertson; Mohamed Darif; Charles Theuer; Neeraj Agarwal
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.