Literature DB >> 16850763

Natural course of silicosis in dust-exposed workers.

Haibing Yang1, Lei Yang, Junyue Zhang, Jingqiong Chen.   

Abstract

To provide a scientific basis for determining the health surveillance period of dust-exposed workers, data of a retrospective cohort study was re-analyzed with emphasis on natural course of silicosis. 33640 workers exposed to silica dust who were employed for at least 1 year from 1972 to 1974 in twenty Chinese mines or pottery factories were included as subjects, and were followed up till December 31, 1994. The cohort included subjects from 8 tungsten mines, 4 tin mines and 8 pottery factories. Our results showed that the mean latency of silicosis, for all the cases of the cohorts, was 22.9 +/- 9.8 y. 52.2 % of silicosis was diagnosed approximately 9.1 +/- 5.7 y after the dust exposure had ceased. The progression rates of silicosis from stage I to II and from stage II to III were 48.2 % and 18.5 %, and the duration was 4.1 +/- 0.2 and 6.8 +/- 0.2 y, respectively. The survival times of silicosis stage I , II and III, from the year of diagnosis to death, were 21.5, 15.8 and 6.8 years, respectively. There was 25 % of the silicosis patients whose survival time was beyond 33 y. The mean death age of all silicosis cases was 56.0 y. The death age increased to 65.6 y in the middle of 1990s. Among dust-exposed workers, subjects who became suspected case (0+ ) accounted for 15.0 %. 48.7 % of the suspected silicosis cases developed to silicosis, and the average year from the time of being suspected of the disease to the first stage of silicosis was 5.1 y. The natural characteristics, as mentioned above, varied with different mines and factories. We are led to conclude that silicosis is chronic in nature, but progress quickly. As a serious occupational disease it significantly reduces the life span of exposed workers. The study of its natural history is of importance for the development of health surveillance criteria for dust-exposed workers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16850763     DOI: 10.1007/bf02895832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  8 in total

1.  Exposure to silica and silicosis among tin miners in China: exposure-response analyses and risk assessment.

Authors:  W Chen; Z Zhuang; M D Attfield; B T Chen; P Gao; J C Harrison; C Fu; J Q Chen; W E Wallace
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Radiological progression and its predictive risk factors in silicosis.

Authors:  H S Lee; W H Phoon; T P Ng
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  A 40-year follow-up of whetstone cutters on silicosis.

Authors:  Suteo Ogawa; Hiroto Imai; Masayuki Ikeda
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.179

4.  Lung cancer risk, silica exposure, and silicosis in Chinese mines and pottery factories: the modifying role of other workplace lung carcinogens.

Authors:  P Cocco; C H Rice; J Q Chen; M A McCawley; J K McLaughlin; M Dosemeci
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 5.  Assessment of silicosis risk for occupational exposure to crystalline silica.

Authors:  F L Rice; L T Stayner
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.024

6.  Risk of silicosis in a cohort of white South African gold miners.

Authors:  E Hnizdo; G K Sluis-Cremer
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  Silicosis in the 1990s.

Authors:  K D Rosenman; M J Reilly; D J Kalinowski; F C Watt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Silicosis surveillance in Ontario: detection rates, modifying factors, and screening intervals.

Authors:  M M Finkelstein
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.214

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  The impact of different approaches to exposure assessment on understanding non-malignant respiratory disease risk in taconite miners.

Authors:  Nnaemeka U Odo; Jeffrey H Mandel; Bruce H Alexander; David M Perlman; Richard F MacLehose; Gurumurthy Ramachandran; Andrew D Ryan; Yuan Shao
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Silicosis among agate workers at Shakarpur: An analysis of clinic-based data.

Authors:  Nayanjeet Chaudhury; Ajay Phatak; Rajiv Paliwal; Chandra Raichaudhari
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2010-10

3.  Cohort mortality study in three ceramic factories in Jingdezhen in China.

Authors:  Xiaokang Zhang; Haijiao Wang; Xiaomin Zhu; Yuewei Liu; Limin Wang; Qici Dai; Niane Cai; Tangchun Wu; Weihong Chen
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2008-08-15

4.  WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: Protocol for systematic reviews of exposure to occupational ergonomic risk factors and of the effect of exposure to occupational ergonomic risk factors on osteoarthritis of hip or knee and selected other musculoskeletal diseases.

Authors:  Carel T J Hulshof; Claudio Colosio; Joost G Daams; Ivan D Ivanov; K C Prakash; Paul P F M Kuijer; Nancy Leppink; Stefan Mandic-Rajcevic; Frederica Masci; Henk F van der Molen; Subas Neupane; Clas-Håkan Nygård; Jodi Oakman; Frank Pega; Karin Proper; Annette M Prüss-Üstün; Yuka Ujita; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 9.621

5.  Demographic, exposure and clinical characteristics in a multinational registry of engineered stone workers with silicosis.

Authors:  Jeremy Tang Hua; Lauren Zell-Baran; Leonard H T Go; Mordechai R Kramer; Johanna B Van Bree; Daniel Chambers; David Deller; Katrina Newbigin; Michael Matula; Elizabeth Fireman; Mor Dahbash; Cristina Martinez-Gonzalez; Antonio León-Jimenez; Coralynn Sack; Jaume Ferrer; Ana Villar; Kirsten S Almberg; Robert A Cohen; Cecile S Rose
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.948

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.