BACKGROUND: Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer sometimes show a dramatic clinical response to gefitinib or erlotinib, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) specific for the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). However, until April 2004, it was unclear how to identify patients who would benefit from these drugs. Then, two groups from Boston reported that EGFR gene mutations in the kinase domain are strongly associated with gefitinib sensitivity. EGFR mutations are more frequent in Asians, females, nonsmokers, and adenocarcinomas than in their counterparts. These populations precisely coincide with those populations with higher response rates to TKIs. We and others subsequently confirmed and extended these findings. METHODS: We reviewed recent literatures on EGFR mutations and EGFR-TKIs. We discuss topics including the molecular epidemiology and biology of EGFR mutations in relation to EGFR-TKIs, the controversy about whether EGFR mutations account for all the clinical activity of EGFR-TKIs, and the mechanisms of acquired resistance to gefitinib or erlotinib. RESULTS: The discovery of EGFR mutations has great biologic and clinical implications in lung cancer. However, all but one phase III trials have so far failed to show a survival advantage of the treatment arm involving EGFR-TKIs. CONCLUSION: It would be possible to individualize EGFR-TKI treatment of lung cancer by selecting patients according to EGFR mutational status and other biomarkers.
BACKGROUND:Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer sometimes show a dramatic clinical response to gefitinib or erlotinib, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) specific for the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). However, until April 2004, it was unclear how to identify patients who would benefit from these drugs. Then, two groups from Boston reported that EGFR gene mutations in the kinase domain are strongly associated with gefitinib sensitivity. EGFR mutations are more frequent in Asians, females, nonsmokers, and adenocarcinomas than in their counterparts. These populations precisely coincide with those populations with higher response rates to TKIs. We and others subsequently confirmed and extended these findings. METHODS: We reviewed recent literatures on EGFR mutations and EGFR-TKIs. We discuss topics including the molecular epidemiology and biology of EGFR mutations in relation to EGFR-TKIs, the controversy about whether EGFR mutations account for all the clinical activity of EGFR-TKIs, and the mechanisms of acquired resistance to gefitinib or erlotinib. RESULTS: The discovery of EGFR mutations has great biologic and clinical implications in lung cancer. However, all but one phase III trials have so far failed to show a survival advantage of the treatment arm involving EGFR-TKIs. CONCLUSION: It would be possible to individualize EGFR-TKI treatment of lung cancer by selecting patients according to EGFR mutational status and other biomarkers.
Authors: Miguel Taron; Yukito Ichinose; Rafael Rosell; Tony Mok; Bartomeu Massuti; Lurdes Zamora; Jose Luis Mate; Christian Manegold; Mayumi Ono; Cristina Queralt; Thierry Jahan; Jose Javier Sanchez; Maria Sanchez-Ronco; Victor Hsue; David Jablons; Jose Miguel Sanchez; Teresa Moran Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-08-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Roy S Herbst; Diane Prager; Robert Hermann; Lou Fehrenbacher; Bruce E Johnson; Alan Sandler; Mark G Kris; Hai T Tran; Pam Klein; Xin Li; David Ramies; David H Johnson; Vincent A Miller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-07-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mark G Kris; Ronald B Natale; Roy S Herbst; Thomas J Lynch; Diane Prager; Chandra P Belani; Joan H Schiller; Karen Kelly; Harris Spiridonidis; Alan Sandler; Kathy S Albain; David Cella; Michael K Wolf; Steven D Averbuch; Judith J Ochs; Andrea C Kay Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-10-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Giuseppe Giaccone; Roy S Herbst; Christian Manegold; Giorgio Scagliotti; Rafael Rosell; Vincent Miller; Ronald B Natale; Joan H Schiller; Joachim Von Pawel; Anna Pluzanska; Ulrich Gatzemeier; John Grous; Judith S Ochs; Steven D Averbuch; Michael K Wolf; Pamela Rennie; Abderrahim Fandi; David H Johnson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Vincent A Miller; Mark G Kris; Neelam Shah; Jyoti Patel; Christopher Azzoli; Jorge Gomez; Lee M Krug; William Pao; Naiyer Rizvi; Barbara Pizzo; Leslie Tyson; Ennapadam Venkatraman; Leah Ben-Porat; Natalie Memoli; Maureen Zakowski; Valerie Rusch; Robert T Heelan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Todd A Carter; Lisa M Wodicka; Neil P Shah; Anne Marie Velasco; Miles A Fabian; Daniel K Treiber; Zdravko V Milanov; Corey E Atteridge; William H Biggs; Philip T Edeen; Mark Floyd; Julia M Ford; Robert M Grotzfeld; Sanna Herrgard; Darren E Insko; Shamal A Mehta; Hitesh K Patel; William Pao; Charles L Sawyers; Harold Varmus; Patrick P Zarrinkar; David J Lockhart Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-07-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Vei Mah; Diana Marquez; Mohammad Alavi; Erin L Maresh; Li Zhang; Nam Yoon; Steve Horvath; Lora Bagryanova; Michael C Fishbein; David Chia; Richard Pietras; Lee Goodglick Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Juan An; Chuan-Hao Tang; Na Wang; Yi Liu; Jin Lv; Bin Xu; Xiao-Yan Li; Wan-Feng Guo; Hong-Jun Gao; Kun He; Xiao-Qing Liu Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2018-04-11 Impact factor: 2.967