Literature DB >> 16849194

A modelling approach to estimate the sensitivity of pooled faecal samples for isolation of Salmonella in pigs.

Mark E Arnold1, Alasdair Cook, Rob Davies.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop and parametrize a mathematical model of the sensitivity of pooled sampling of faeces to detect Salmonella infection in pigs. A mathematical model was developed to represent the effect of pooling on the probability of Salmonella isolation. Parameters for the model were estimated using data obtained by collecting 50 faecal samples from each of two pig farms. Each sample was tested for Salmonella at individual sample weights of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 10 and 25 g and pools of 5, 10 and 20 samples were created from the individual samples. The highest test sensitivity for individual samples was found at 10 g (90% sensitivity), with the 25 g test sensitivity equal to 83%. For samples of less than 10 g, sensitivity was found to reduce with sample weight. Incubation for 48 h was found to produce a more sensitive test than incubation for 24 h. Model results found increasing sensitivity with more samples in the pool, with the pools of 5, 10 and 20 being more sensitive than individual sampling, and the pools of 20 being the most sensitive of those considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16849194      PMCID: PMC1578272          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2005.0057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  18 in total

1.  Estimating the prevalence of infectious agents using pooled samples: biometrical considerations.

Authors:  U Abel; R Schosser; J Süss
Journal:  Zentralbl Bakteriol       Date:  1999-12

2.  First international ring trial of ELISAs for Salmonella-antibody detection in swine.

Authors:  H M van der Heijden
Journal:  Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.328

3.  Enhanced culture techniques for the detection of Salmonella.

Authors:  R H Davies; S Bedford; S Shankster
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2001-04-28       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  Estimation of animal-level prevalence from pooled samples in animal production.

Authors:  E G Evers; M J Nauta
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 2.670

5.  Relationship between sample weight, homogeneity, and sensitivity of fecal culture for Salmonella enterica.

Authors:  Rob M Cannon; Terry J Nicholls
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.279

6.  The effect of fecal sample weight on detection of Salmonella enterica in swine feces.

Authors:  J A Funk; P R Davies; M A Nichols
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.279

7.  Survival of Salmonella paratyphi B in sewers; its significance in the investigation of paratyphoid outbreaks.

Authors:  R W HARVEY; W P PHILLIPS
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1955-07-16       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Comparison of sampling techniques for measuring the antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric Escherichia coli recovered from feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Bruce A Wagner; David A Dargatz; Paul S Morley; Thomas E Wittum; Thomas J Keefe
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.156

9.  Trends and seasonal variations in the occurrence of Salmonella in pigs, pork and humans in Denmark, 1995-2000.

Authors:  T Hald; J S Andersen
Journal:  Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.328

10.  Evaluation of methods for recovery of Salmonella from dairy cattle, poultry, and swine farms.

Authors:  Philipus Pangloli; Yobouet Dje; S P Oliver; A Mathew; D A Golden; W J Taylor; F A Draughon
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.077

View more
  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of the sensitivity of faecal sampling for detection of monophasic Salmonella Typhimurium and other Salmonella in cattle and pigs.

Authors:  M E Arnold; R J Gosling; F Martelli; D Mueller-Doblies; R H Davies
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.434

2.  Evaluation of the pooling of swabs for real-time PCR detection of low titre shedding of low pathogenicity avian influenza in turkeys.

Authors:  M E Arnold; M J Slomka; V J Coward; S Mahmood; P J Raleigh; I H Brown
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 4.434

3.  Evaluation of an enhanced cleaning and disinfection protocol in Salmonella contaminated pig holdings in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Francesca Martelli; Mark Lambert; Paul Butt; Tanya Cheney; Fabrizio Antonio Tatone; Rebecca Callaby; André Rabie; Rebecca J Gosling; Steve Fordon; Graham Crocker; Robert H Davies; Richard Piers Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Epidemiological Study on Salmonella Prevalence in Sow Herds Using Direct and Indirect Detection Methods.

Authors:  Isabell Hollmann; Jan Berend Lingens; Volker Wilke; Christian Homann; Klaus Teich; Juhle Buch; Bussarakam Chuppava; Christian Visscher
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-07-28

5.  Assessing risk profiles for Salmonella serotypes in breeding pig operations in Portugal using a Bayesian hierarchical model.

Authors:  Carla Correia-Gomes; Theodoros Economou; Denisa Mendonça; Madalena Vieira-Pinto; João Niza-Ribeiro
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  A prevalence study of Salmonella spp., Yersinia spp., Toxoplasma gondii and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in UK pigs at slaughter.

Authors:  L F Powell; T E A Cheney; S Williamson; E Guy; R P Smith; R H Davies
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 4.434

7.  Bayesian analysis of culture and PCR methods for detection of Campylobacter spp. in broiler caecal samples.

Authors:  M E Arnold; E M Jones; J R Lawes; A B Vidal; F A Clifton-Hadley; J D Rodgers; L F Powell
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.434

Review 8.  Prevalence and risk factors for bacterial food-borne zoonotic hazards in slaughter pigs: a review.

Authors:  J Fosse; H Seegers; C Magras
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 2.702

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.