Literature DB >> 16848844

Diagnosis, treatment, and management of breast cancer in previously augmented women.

Richard Tuli1, Ryan A Flynn, Kristin L Brill, Jennifer L Sabol, Kenneth Y Usuki, Anne L Rosenberg.   

Abstract

Augmentation mammaplasty is rapidly becoming one of the most frequently performed cosmetic surgeries. However, as the augmented patient population ages, major concerns associated with the screening, diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer are being realized. Although current evidence convincingly indicates that breast implants do not play a role in inducing localized or systemic disease, particularly breast cancer, recent studies have shown implants not only reduce the sensitivity of mammography, but interfere with mammographic detection, possibly leading to delayed breast cancer diagnosis. In addition, the risk for local recurrence, as well as unfavorable cosmetic results, breast fibrosis, and capsular contracture following radiation therapy as part of breast-conserving therapy in previously augmented patients are of great concern. Given the overall lack of treatment consensus, paucity of literature, and increasing number of augmented breast cancer patients, we provide a retrospective review of the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of 12 augmented patients from 1998 to 2004 who developed breast cancer. Eight of 12 augmented patients presented with a palpable mass on physical examination, which prompted further mammographic evaluation. Abnormalities in the remaining four individuals were detected on routine mammographic screening. Pathology staging results were available for all 12 patients. Breast-conserving therapy was used to treat six patients and adequate negative pathologic margins were obtained in all patients. The remaining six patients were treated with mastectomy due to multifocal disease, inadequate margins, or proximity to the implant capsule. Thus far, one patient has had local recurrence and one patient has had distant recurrence after initial surgery. No evidence of local or systemic recurrence, infection, contracture, poor cosmetic outcome, or other complications has been detected in the remaining 10 patients as of the most recent follow-up. Based on this small cohort of augmented women, the presence of implants led to an increased proportion of palpable tumors, in spite of routine screening mammography. Consistent with other studies, although our results suggest a tendency toward delayed diagnosis in augmented women relative to age-matched controls, this did not appear to influence the overall prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16848844     DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00273.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  5 in total

1.  Differential profiling of breast cancer plasma proteome by isotope-coded affinity tagging method reveals biotinidase as a breast cancer biomarker.

Authors:  Un-Beom Kang; Younghee Ahn; Jong Won Lee; Yong-Hak Kim; Joon Kim; Myeong-Hee Yu; Dong-Young Noh; Cheolju Lee
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 4.430

2.  Screening of women with aesthetic prostheses in dedicated sessions of a population-based breast cancer screening programme.

Authors:  Silvia Deandrea; Laura Cavazzana; Niccolò Principi; Ester Luconi; Mauro Campoleoni; Anan Judina Bastiampillai; Lucia Bracchi; Lauro Bucchi; Stella Pedilarco; Antonio Piscitelli; Maria Silvia Sfondrini; Anna Rita Silvestri; Silvana Castaldi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  A case of synchronous multiple bilateral breast cancer after breast augmentation.

Authors:  Shinya Yamamoto; Takashi Chishima; Fumi Harada; Yuka Matsubara
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-12-23

4.  External beam accelerated partial breast irradiation yields favorable outcomes in patients with prior breast augmentation.

Authors:  Rachel Y Lei; Charles E Leonard; Kathryn T Howell; Phyllis L Henkenberns; Timothy K Johnson; Tracy L Hobart; Jane M Kercher; Jodi L Widner; Terese Kaske; Lora D Barke; Dennis L Carter
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Study of breast implants mammography examinations for identification of suitable image quality criteria.

Authors:  Cláudia Sá Dos Reis; Isabelle Gremion; Nicole Richli Meystre
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-01-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.