Literature DB >> 16847908

Reliability and validity of the sexual pressure scale.

Rachel Jones1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop the Sexual Pressure Scale (SPS) as a valid and reliable measure of gender stereotypical expectations to engage in sexual behavior. Data were collected using audio computer-assisted self-interview in 306 urban women, aged 18 to 29. Exploratory principal components analysis with varimax rotation yielded 19 items consisting of five factors: Condom Fear, Sexual Coercion, Women's Sex Role, Men Expect Sex, and Show Trust, accounting for 62% of the variance. Divergent and convergent validity were supported, respectively, by negative relationships of SPS factors with dyadic trust and positive relationships with sexual victimization and sexual risk behavior. Alpha reliability was .81; factor reliabilities ranged from .63 to .82. A valid assessment of sexual pressure can suggest the extent to which stereotypical gender expectations structure women's freedom to explore partner and condom use choices. Copyright 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16847908     DOI: 10.1002/nur.20142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  11 in total

1.  From Sexual Assault to Sexual Risk: A Relational Pathway?

Authors:  Brooke E Wells; Tyrel J Starks; Erika Robel; Brian C Kelly; Jeffrey T Parsons; Sarit A Golub
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2015-05-05

2.  Psychometric evaluation of the Condom Barriers and Motivations Scale (CBMS).

Authors:  Sarit A Golub; Kristi E Gamarel
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-12-19

3.  Young urban women's patterns of unprotected sex with men engaging in HIV risk behaviors.

Authors:  Rachel Jones; Marsha Oliver
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2006-12-08

4.  Reliability and validity of the Sexual Pressure Scale for Women-Revised.

Authors:  Rachel Jones; Elsie Gulick
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.228

5.  Condom Coercion, Sexual Relationship Power, and Risk for HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Young Women Attending Urban Family Planning Clinics.

Authors:  Anne M Teitelman; Julia M Bohinski; Adriane M Tuttle
Journal:  Fam Viol Prev Health Pract       Date:  2010

6.  Soap opera video on handheld computers to reduce young urban women's HIV sex risk.

Authors:  Rachel Jones
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2008-06-06

7.  Partner Pressure, Victimization History, and Alcohol: Women's Condom-Decision Abdication Mediated by Mood and Anticipated Negative Partner Reaction.

Authors:  William H George; Kelly Cue Davis; N Tatiana Masters; Kelly F Kajumulo; Cynthia A Stappenbeck; Jeanette Norris; Julia R Heiman; Jennifer M Staples
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2016-01

8.  Temperament, Context and Sexual Risk among College Students.

Authors:  Victoria von Sadovszky
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2011-06-16

9.  Psychological Effects of Abuse, Partner Pressure, and Alcohol: The Roles of in-the-Moment Condom Negotiation Efficacy and Condom-Decision Abdication on Women's Intentions to Engage in Condomless Sex.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Neilson; Amanda K Gilmore; Cynthia A Stappenbeck; Natasha K Gulati; Erin Neilon; William H George; Kelly C Davis
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2019-06-27

10.  The Reproductive Agency Scale (RAS-17): development and validation in a cross-sectional study of pregnant Qatari and non-Qatari Arab Women.

Authors:  Kathryn M Yount; Laurie James-Hawkins; Hanan F Abdul Rahim
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.