Literature DB >> 16847824

FDA perspective on trials with interim efficacy evaluations.

Robert Temple1.   

Abstract

Over the years FDA has seen a variety of 'adaptive' approaches, including repeated calculation of p-values. More recently there has been interest in adjusting sample sizes based on event rates, easy if the treatment group rates remain blinded but possible even with unblinded analysis. In large trials, group sequential analytic approaches are routine. Early stopping however, can reduce available data and in cardiac trials we have generally urged use of only survival as the basis for stopping, even if the primary endpoint is a composite (death, new AMI, etc). Other possibilities include adaptive randomization and starting additional dose groups. Enrichment designs focus on populations with a higher event rate or on populations more likely to respond. They can reduce sample sizes and target therapy toward people most likely to benefit. Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16847824     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  3 in total

1.  CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

Authors:  David Moher; Sally Hopewell; Kenneth F Schulz; Victor Montori; Peter C Gøtzsche; P J Devereaux; Diana Elbourne; Matthias Egger; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-23

Review 2.  Statistical issues in clinical trial design.

Authors:  Kenneth R Hess
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Pivotal studies of orphan drugs approved for neurological diseases.

Authors:  Jun Mitsumoto; E Ray Dorsey; Christopher A Beck; Karl Kieburtz; Robert C Griggs
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 10.422

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.