Literature DB >> 16847790

Gait efficiency using the C-Leg.

Michael S Orendurff1, Ava D Segal, Glenn K Klute, Martin L McDowell, Janice A Pecoraro, Joseph M Czerniecki.   

Abstract

Microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees are claimed to improve gait efficiency in transfemoral (TF) amputees. This hypothesis was tested in a prospective randomized crossover trial that compared the Mauch SNS knee and the C-Leg microprocessor-controlled knee in eight TF amputees. The subjects were given a 3-month acclimation period in each knee. Then, their net oxygen cost (mL/kg/m) was measured while they walked overground at four speeds in random order: 0.8 m/s, 1.0 m/s, 1.3 m/s, and self-selected walking speed (SSWS). The C-Leg caused small reductions in net oxygen cost that were not statistically significant compared with the Mauch SNS at any of the walking speeds (p > 0.190). Subjects chose higher SSWSs with the C-Leg compared with the Mauch SNS (mean +/- standard deviation = 1.31 +/- 0.12 m/s vs 1.21 +/- 0.10 m/s, respectively, p = 0.046) but did not incur higher oxygen costs (p = 0.270), which suggests greater efficiency only at their SSWS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16847790     DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2005.06.0095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  8 in total

1.  Use of Perturbation-Based Gait Training in a Virtual Environment to Address Mediolateral Instability in an Individual With Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation.

Authors:  Riley C Sheehan; Christopher A Rábago; Jonathan H Rylander; Jonathan B Dingwell; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2016-06-08

2.  Gait asymmetry of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees.

Authors:  Kenton R Kaufman; Serena Frittoli; Carlo A Frigo
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Energy expenditure and activity of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees.

Authors:  Kenton R Kaufman; James A Levine; Robert H Brey; Shelly K McCrady; Denny J Padgett; Michael J Joyner
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 4.  Measures and procedures utilized to determine the added value of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joints: a systematic review.

Authors:  Patrick J R Theeven; Bea Hemmen; Peter R G Brink; Rob J E M Smeets; Henk A M Seelen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Optimal design and control of an electromechanical transfemoral prosthesis with energy regeneration.

Authors:  Farbod Rohani; Hanz Richter; Antonie J van den Bogert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of a computerized algorithm and prosthetists' judgment in rating functional levels based on daily step activity in transtibial amputees.

Authors:  Michael S Orendurff; Toshiki Kobayashi; Christopher Q Villarosa; Kim L Coleman; David A Boone
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2016-10-10

Review 7.  Economic benefits of microprocessor controlled prosthetic knees: a modeling study.

Authors:  Christine Chen; Mark Hanson; Ritika Chaturvedi; Soeren Mattke; Richard Hillestad; Harry H Liu
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Prosthetic Knee Selection for Individuals with Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Phillip M Stevens; Shane R Wurdeman
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  2018-11-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.