OBJECTIVE: Two studies, based on an alcohol myopia model, were designed to understand the role of women's alcohol consumption on vulnerability to sexual assault. We predicted that, in a high- conflict social situation, alcohol would make it more difficult to recognize sexual assault risk, lowering intentions to resist sexual advances. METHOD: In Study 1, women (N = 51) were recruited in bars and classified as having a high (.06 or greater) breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) or low BrAC. They were asked to project themselves into a hypothetical scenario that portrayed interest in establishing an intimate relationship and included mild sexual aggression. In Study 2, women (N = 101) were randomly assigned to an alcohol (target BrAC: .08%), placebo, or no-alcohol condition. They responded at two time points to a similar hypothetical scenario that described mild sexual aggression (Time 1) and serious sexual aggression (Time 2). RESULTS: In Study 1, women with higher BrAC perceived less risk in the scenario and anticipated less resistance than women with low BrAC. In Study 2, similar results were found but only following serious aggression. There were no placebo effects. Both studies suggest that the effects of alcohol on resistance are partially mediated via risk perceptions. CONCLUSIONS:Alcohol appears to reduce intentions to resist sexual advances from an acquaintance while increasing intentions to pursue relationship-enhancing behaviors. Effects are not completely explained by an alcohol myopia perspective. Differences in findings between the two studies may reflect differences in methodology, context, or sample.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Two studies, based on an alcoholmyopia model, were designed to understand the role of women's alcohol consumption on vulnerability to sexual assault. We predicted that, in a high- conflict social situation, alcohol would make it more difficult to recognize sexual assault risk, lowering intentions to resist sexual advances. METHOD: In Study 1, women (N = 51) were recruited in bars and classified as having a high (.06 or greater) breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) or low BrAC. They were asked to project themselves into a hypothetical scenario that portrayed interest in establishing an intimate relationship and included mild sexual aggression. In Study 2, women (N = 101) were randomly assigned to an alcohol (target BrAC: .08%), placebo, or no-alcohol condition. They responded at two time points to a similar hypothetical scenario that described mild sexual aggression (Time 1) and serious sexual aggression (Time 2). RESULTS: In Study 1, women with higher BrAC perceived less risk in the scenario and anticipated less resistance than women with low BrAC. In Study 2, similar results were found but only following serious aggression. There were no placebo effects. Both studies suggest that the effects of alcohol on resistance are partially mediated via risk perceptions. CONCLUSIONS:Alcohol appears to reduce intentions to resist sexual advances from an acquaintance while increasing intentions to pursue relationship-enhancing behaviors. Effects are not completely explained by an alcoholmyopia perspective. Differences in findings between the two studies may reflect differences in methodology, context, or sample.
Authors: Jeanette Norris; William H George; Susan A Stoner; N Tatiana Masters; Tina Zawacki; Kelly Cue Davis Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Nora E Noel; Stephen A Maisto; Richard L Ogle; James D Johnson; Lee A Jackson; Calvin M Sims Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Alyssa L Norris; Kate B Carey; Jennifer L Walsh; Robyn L Shepardson; Michael P Carey Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-02-04 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Maria Testa; Kathleen A Parks; Joseph H Hoffman; Cory A Crane; Kenneth E Leonard; Kathleen Shyhalla Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Tara Kelley-Baker; Elizabeth A Mumford; Radha Vishnuvajjala; Robert B Voas; Eduardo Romano; Mark Johnson Journal: J Alcohol Drug Educ Date: 2008
Authors: Charlene Y Senn; Misha Eliasziw; Paula C Barata; Wilfreda E Thurston; Ian R Newby-Clark; H Lorraine Radtke; Karen L Hobden Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 2.809