AIMS: Underuse of warfarin for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF) is extensive and represents a major problem in clinical practice. To identify factors associated with warfarin treatment in eligible AF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of all Swedish resident AF patients at the Stockholm South General Hospital during 2002 (n=2796). Medical records were examined and complemented by data from the Swedish National Hospital Discharge Register. Sixty-eight percent of the patients (1898/2796) had indications, and no apparent contraindications for warfarin treatment. Of these 54% (1029/1898) got warfarin. Factors favouring warfarin treatment after adjustment for other factors were history of ischaemic stroke, an implanted pacemaker, treatment in a cardiology rather than internal medicine ward and valvular defect. Factors associated with a reduced likelihood of warfarin treatment were paroxysmal type of AF and age >80 years. Important risk factors for stroke in AF like heart failure, hypertension, and diabetes did not increase the chances of warfarin treatment. CONCLUSION: Risk stratification using known risk factors of stroke seems to affect warfarin treatment only to a minor degree in clinical practice. Undertreatment was particularly common in patients with paroxysmal AF and in patients aged >80 years and calls for improved clinical routines in accordance with international guidelines.
AIMS: Underuse of warfarin for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF) is extensive and represents a major problem in clinical practice. To identify factors associated with warfarin treatment in eligible AFpatients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of all Swedish resident AFpatients at the Stockholm South General Hospital during 2002 (n=2796). Medical records were examined and complemented by data from the Swedish National Hospital Discharge Register. Sixty-eight percent of the patients (1898/2796) had indications, and no apparent contraindications for warfarin treatment. Of these 54% (1029/1898) got warfarin. Factors favouring warfarin treatment after adjustment for other factors were history of ischaemic stroke, an implanted pacemaker, treatment in a cardiology rather than internal medicine ward and valvular defect. Factors associated with a reduced likelihood of warfarin treatment were paroxysmal type of AF and age >80 years. Important risk factors for stroke in AF like heart failure, hypertension, and diabetes did not increase the chances of warfarin treatment. CONCLUSION: Risk stratification using known risk factors of stroke seems to affect warfarin treatment only to a minor degree in clinical practice. Undertreatment was particularly common in patients with paroxysmal AF and in patients aged >80 years and calls for improved clinical routines in accordance with international guidelines.
Authors: Andrew Young Chang; Mariam Askari; Jun Fan; Paul A Heidenreich; P Michael Ho; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Aditya Jathin Ullal; Alexander Carroll Perino; Mintu P Turakhia Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2018-09-22 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Tomas Forslund; Björn Wettermark; Per Wändell; Mia von Euler; Jan Hasselström; Paul Hjemdahl Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: William R Lewis; Gregg C Fonarow; Kenneth A LaBresh; Christopher P Cannon; Wenqin Pan; Dennis M Super; Suzanne A Sorof; Lee H Schwamm Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2008-11-07 Impact factor: 2.778