Literature DB >> 16846974

Apoptosis is initiated in human keratinocytes exposed to signalling factors from microbeam irradiated cells.

Fiona M Lyng1, Paula Maguire, Niamh Kilmurray, Carmel Mothersill, Chunlin Shao, Melvyn Folkard, Kevin M Prise.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is now no doubt that bystander signalling from irradiated cells occurs and causes a variety of responses in cells not targeted by the ionizing track. However, the mechanisms underlying these processes are unknown and the relevance to radiotherapy and risk assessment remains controversial. Previous research by our laboratory has shown bystander effects in a human keratinocyte cell line, HPV-G cells, exposed to medium from gamma irradiated HPV-G cells. The aim of this work was to investigate if similar mechanisms to those identified in medium transfer experiments occurred in these HPV-G cells when they are in the vicinity of microbeam irradiated cells. Demonstration of a commonality of mechanisms would support the idea that the process is not artifactual.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: HPV-G cells were plated as two separate populations on mylar dishes. One population was directly irradiated using a charged particle microbeam (1 - 10 protons). The other population was not irradiated. Bystander factor-induced apoptosis was investigated in both populations following treatment by monitoring the levels of reactive oxygen species and mitochondrial membrane potential using fluorescent probes. Expression of the anti-apoptotic protein, bcl-2, and cytochrome c were determined, as well as apoptosis levels.
RESULTS: Microbeam irradiation induced increases in reactive oxygen species and decreases in mitochondrial membrane potential at 6 h post-exposure, increased expression of bcl-2 and cytochrome c release at 6.5 h and increased apoptosis at 24 h.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that similar bystander signalling pathways leading to apoptosis are induced following microbeam irradiation and following medium transfer. This demonstrates that the mechanisms involved are common across different radiation qualities and conditions and indicates that they may be relevant in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16846974     DOI: 10.1080/09553000600803904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  13 in total

1.  Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector model.

Authors:  Helmut Schöllnberger; Peter M Eckl
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Radiation-induced bystander effect in large Japanese field mouse (Apodemus speciosus) embryonic cells.

Authors:  Kentaro Ariyoshi; Tomisato Miura; Kosuke Kasai; Nakata Akifumi; Yohei Fujishima; Mitsuaki A Yoshida
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 3.  Targeted and Off-Target (Bystander and Abscopal) Effects of Radiation Therapy: Redox Mechanisms and Risk/Benefit Analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pouget; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Jean-Luc Ravanat
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 8.401

4.  The cross-talk between Bax, Bcl2, caspases, and DNA damage in bystander HepG2 cells is regulated by γ-radiation dose and time of conditioned media transfer.

Authors:  Sharmi Mukherjee; Anindita Dutta; Anindita Chakraborty
Journal:  Apoptosis       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Radiotherapy suppresses angiogenesis in mice through TGF-betaRI/ALK5-dependent inhibition of endothelial cell sprouting.

Authors:  Natsuko Imaizumi; Yan Monnier; Monika Hegi; René-Olivier Mirimanoff; Curzio Rüegg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Ultra-Violet Light Emission from HPV-G Cells Irradiated with Low Let Radiation From (90)Y; Consequences for Radiation Induced Bystander Effects.

Authors:  Syed Bilal Ahmad; Fiona E McNeill; Soo Hyun Byun; William V Prestwich; Carmel Mothersill; Colin Seymour; Andrea Armstrong; Cristian Fernandez
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  ATM acts downstream of ATR in the DNA damage response signaling of bystander cells.

Authors:  Susanne Burdak-Rothkamm; Kai Rothkamm; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  LET-dependent bystander effects caused by irradiation of human prostate carcinoma cells with X rays or alpha particles.

Authors:  Vered Anzenberg; Sarika Chandiramani; Jeffrey A Coderre
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Radiation-induced bystander effect in non-irradiated glioblastoma spheroid cells.

Authors:  Fahime Faqihi; Ali Neshastehriz; Shokouhozaman Soleymanifard; Robabeh Shabani; Nazila Eivazzadeh
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  BRCA1, FANCD2 and Chk1 are potential molecular targets for the modulation of a radiation-induced DNA damage response in bystander cells.

Authors:  Susanne Burdak-Rothkamm; Kai Rothkamm; Keeva McClelland; Shahnaz T Al Rashid; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 8.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.