Literature DB >> 16846969

Manipulating inattentional blindness within and across sensory modalities.

Scott Sinnett1, Albert Costa, Salvador Soto-Faraco.   

Abstract

People often fail to consciously perceive visual events that are outside the focus of attention, a phenomenon referred to as inattentional blindness or IB (i.e., Mack & Rock, 1998). Here, we investigated IB for words within and across sensory modalities (visually and auditorily) in order to assess whether dividing attention across different senses has the same consequences as dividing attention within an individual sensory modality. Participants were asked to monitor a rapid stream of pictures or sounds presented concurrently with task-irrelevant words (spoken or written). A word recognition test was used to measure the processing for unattended words compared to word recognition levels after explicitly monitoring the word stream. We were able to produce high levels of IB for visually and auditorily presented words under unimodal conditions (Experiment 1) as well as under crossmodal conditions (Experiment 2). A further manipulation revealed, however, that IB is less prevalent when attention is divided across modalities than within the same modality (Experiment 3). These findings are explained in terms of the attentional load hypothesis and suggest that, contrary to some claims, attention resources are to a certain extent shared across sensory modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16846969     DOI: 10.1080/17470210500298948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  15 in total

1.  Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.

Authors:  Rajwant Sandhu; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Inattentional deafness in music.

Authors:  Sabrina Koreimann; Bartosz Gula; Oliver Vitouch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-21

3.  Visual perceptual load induces inattentional deafness.

Authors:  James S P Macdonald; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Neural signature of inattentional deafness.

Authors:  Gautier Durantin; Frederic Dehais; Nicolas Gonthier; Cengiz Terzibas; Daniel E Callan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Are auditory cues special? Evidence from cross-modal distractor-induced blindness.

Authors:  Lea Kern; Michael Niedeggen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 2.157

6.  Inattentional blindness and the von Restorff effect.

Authors:  Stephen R Schmidt; Constance R Schmidt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-02

7.  Attention, awareness, and the perception of auditory scenes.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Melissa K Gregg; David M Weintraub; Claude Alain
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-07

Review 8.  Did you hear that? The role of stimulus similarity and uncertainty in auditory change deafness.

Authors:  Kelly Dickerson; Jeremy R Gaston
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-02

9.  Weight and see: loading working memory improves incidental identification of irrelevant faces.

Authors:  David Carmel; Jake Fairnie; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-15

10.  Load-induced inattentional deafness.

Authors:  Dana Raveh; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.