Literature DB >> 16846577

Planned cesarean versus planned vaginal delivery at term: comparison of newborn infant outcomes.

Toril Kolås1, Ola D Saugstad, Anne K Daltveit, Stein T Nilsen, Pål Øian.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine neonatal outcomes among women with a planned cesarean and a planned vaginal delivery at term. STUDY
DESIGN: This prospective survey was conducted on 18,653 singleton deliveries that represent 24 maternity units during a 6-month period. The data were retrieved from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway and analyzed according to intended mode of delivery.
RESULTS: Compared with planned vaginal deliveries, planned cesarean delivery increased transfer rates to the neonatal intensive care unit from 5.2% to 9.8% (P < .001). The risk for pulmonary disorders (transient tachypnea of the newborn infant and respiratory distress syndrome) rose from 0.8% to 1.6% (P = .01). There were no significant differences in the risks for low Apgar score and neurologic symptoms.
CONCLUSION: A planned cesarean delivery doubled both the rate of transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit and the risk for pulmonary disorders, compared with a planned vaginal delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16846577     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  29 in total

1.  Neonatal mortality risk for repeat cesarean compared to vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States, 1998-2002 birth cohorts.

Authors:  Fay Menacker; Marian F MacDorman; Eugene Declercq
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2010-03

Review 2.  Elective cesarean section: its impact on neonatal respiratory outcome.

Authors:  Ashwin Ramachandrappa; Lucky Jain
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.430

3.  Neonatal Transfer Rate and Mode of Delivery from 37th Week of Gestation in a German Perinatal Center Level 1.

Authors:  J Reinhard; L Hanker; N Sänger; J Yuan; F Louwen
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Don't Rush Me . . . Go the Full 40: AWHONN's Public Health Campaign Promotes Spontaneous Labor and Normal Birth to Reduce Overuse of Inductions and Cesareans.

Authors:  Debra Bingham; Catherine Ruhl; Carolyn Davis Cockey
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2013

5.  The Maternal Infant Microbiome: Considerations for Labor and Birth.

Authors:  Alexis B Dunn; Sheila Jordan; Brenda J Baker; Nicole S Carlson
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.412

Review 6.  Interventions for women who have a caesarean birth to increase uptake and duration of breastfeeding: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Beake; Debra Bick; Cath Narracott; Yan-Shing Chang
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  The effect of mode of delivery on T regulatory (Treg) cells of cord blood.

Authors:  Alisan Yildiran; Engin Yurdakul; Deniz Guloglu; Figen Dogu; Saadet Arsan; Meltem Arikan; Lugen Cengiz; Sevgi Tezcan; Aydan Ikinciogullari
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 8.  Controversy: antenatal steroids.

Authors:  Ronald Wapner; Alan H Jobe
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.430

9.  Birth experience in women with low, intermediate or high levels of fear: findings from the first baby study.

Authors:  Charlotte Elvander; Sven Cnattingius; Kristen H Kjerulff
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.689

10.  Caesarean section and neonatal survival and neurodevelopmental impairments in preterm singleton neonates.

Authors:  Abhay Lodha; Krystyna Ediger; Dianne Creighton; Selphee Tang; Arijit Lodha; Stephen Wood
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.