Literature DB >> 16846539

Effects of a global risk educational tool on primary coronary prevention: the Atherosclerosis Assessment Via Total Risk (AVIATOR) study.

Terry A Jacobson1, Stephen W Gutkin, Charles R Harper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The use of Framingham equations to determine 10-year absolute coronary risk ('global risk') represents an accepted strategy to target coronary prevention measures and enhance clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of providing global risk scores to physicians on the prescription of lipid-lowering therapy for patients at increased coronary risk. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled 368 primary-care patients without a history of coronary heart disease and not on therapy with a hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (i.e. statin). The study was conducted in the general medical clinics of an academic US teaching hospital. In the intervention group (n = 186) patients' charts were reviewed, 10-year absolute coronary risk computed, and this information conveyed via a simple educational tool appended to charts. In the control group (n = 182), charts were accompanied by a form with general information on coronary prevention goals and strategies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary endpoint was the proportion of high-risk patients receiving a new statin prescription. Secondary and tertiary endpoints included (1) the proportion of moderate-risk patients receiving a statin prescription; and (2) the proportion of patients in the whole cohort who had other coronary prevention measures recommended.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in statin prescription to high-risk individuals in the intervention group (40.0%) compared with the control group (37.9%; p = 0.86). Moderate-risk individuals who were not eligible for treatment according to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel II guidelines were more likely to receive a statin prescription in the intervention group versus the control group (28.8% vs. 12.5%. p = 0.036)
CONCLUSIONS: Although a simple global risk educational tool did not improve the targeting of statin therapy to patients at high absolute coronary risk, it may be of benefit in targeting moderate-risk individuals who do not have markedly elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Future research should evaluate the effects of physicians performing their own Framingham risk calculations on statin prescribing and on cholesterol goal attainment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16846539     DOI: 10.1185/030079906X104605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  11 in total

1.  Potential use of 10-year and lifetime coronary risk information for preventive cardiology prescribing decisions: a primary care physician survey.

Authors:  Stephen D Persell; Charles Zei; Kenzie A Cameron; Michael Zielinski; Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-08

Review 2.  Cardiovascular risk assessment and screening in diabetes.

Authors:  Yanglu Zhao
Journal:  Cardiovasc Endocrinol       Date:  2017-02-15

Review 3.  Risk scoring for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Kunal N Karmali; Stephen D Persell; Pablo Perel; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Mark A Berendsen; Mark D Huffman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-14

4.  Assessing coronary risk assessment: what's next?

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Peter Franks
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Estimation of absolute cardiovascular risk in individuals with diabetes mellitus: rationale and approaches.

Authors:  Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui; Modele O Ogunniyi; André P Kengne
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-23

Review 6.  Systematic versus opportunistic risk assessment for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Mariana Dyakova; Saran Shantikumar; Jill L Colquitt; Christian M Drew; Morag Sime; Joanna MacIver; Nicola Wright; Aileen Clarke; Karen Rees
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-29

7.  Ethnic and Gender Differences in 10-Year Coronary Heart Disease Risk: a Cross-Sectional Study in Hawai'i.

Authors:  Claire Townsend Ing; Hyeong Jun Ahn; Rachel Kawakami; Andrew Grandinetti; Todd B Seto; Joseph Keawe'aimoku Kaholokula
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2020-08-31

Review 8.  Systematic review of implementation strategies for risk tables in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Ben van Steenkiste; Richard Grol; Trudy van der Weijden
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008

Review 9.  Does the routine use of global coronary heart disease risk scores translate into clinical benefits or harms? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Eric Crespo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Providing clinicians with a patient's 10-year cardiovascular risk improves their statin prescribing: a true experiment using clinical vignettes.

Authors:  Nishant K Sekaran; Jeremy B Sussman; Anna Xu; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.