Literature DB >> 16846437

Effect of right bundle branch block on electrocardiographic amplitudes, including combined voltage criteria used for the detection of left ventricular hypertrophy.

Peter G Chan1, Michael Logue, Paul Kligfield.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although right bundle branch block (RBBB) delays right ventricular depolarization, its effect on cancellation of right and left ventricular forces within the QRS complex has not been quantified during stable temporal and physiological conditions. Systematic changes in QRS amplitude during transient RBBB bear directly on performance of standard ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and these changes require quantification.
METHODS: We examined the instantaneous effect of RBBB on QRS amplitudes and LVH voltages in 40 patients who had intermittent complete RBBB during a single 10 sec standard 12-lead ECG recording, comprising 0.1% of approximately 400,000 consecutive ECGs in a university teaching hospital setting. Amplitudes were measured by magnifying graticule to the nearest 25 microvolts, averaged for up to 3 normal and 3 RBBB complexes, and compared by paired t test.
RESULTS: RBBB was associated with an increase in initial QRS forces (RV1, RV2, and QV6) but significant decreases in mean mid-QRS amplitudes that reflect left ventricular depolarization (RaVL [-75 microvolts], SV1 [-389 microvolts], SV3 [-617 microvolts], RV5 [-100 microvolts], and RV6 [-123 microvolts]). All late QRS forces were increased with RBBB (R'V1, SV5, SI). As a result, combined voltages used for LVH criteria were significantly reduced by RBBB: Sokolow-Lyon voltage decreased from 1520 +/- 739 to 1014 +/- 512 microvolts (p < 0.001), and Cornell voltage decreased from 1438 +/- 683 to 746 +/- 399 microvolts (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: RBBB is associated with significant reduction in "left ventricular" QRS amplitudes of the standard ECG, consistent with cancellation, rather than unmasking, of left ventricular mid-QRS forces by altered septal and delayed right ventricular depolarization. Because QRS voltages that are routinely combined for the detection of LVH are reduced in RBBB, standard LVH criteria will perform with lower sensitivity in patients with RBBB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16846437      PMCID: PMC6932690          DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2006.00108.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  11 in total

1.  Electrocardiographic diagnosis of ventricular hypertrophy in the presence of right bundlebranch block.

Authors:  R W BOOTH; T C CHOU; R C SCOTT
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1958-08       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Electrocardiographic RV6:RV5 voltage ratio for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  H Koito; D H Spodick
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-01-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in the presence of bundle branch block.

Authors:  B F Vandenberg; D W Romhilt
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads.

Authors:  M SOKOLOW; T P LYON
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1949-02       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 5.  Right bundle branch block: varying electrocardiographic patterns. Aetiological correlation, mechanisms and electrophysiology.

Authors:  A K Agarwal; P Venugopalan
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1999-09-30       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 6.  Limitations of the electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy: the influence of left anterior hemiblock and right bundle branch block.

Authors:  P V Fragola; C Autore; G Magni; M Albertini; L Pierangeli; G Ruscitti; D Cannata
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.164

7.  Electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in the presence of right bundle branch block in cases with essential hypertension.

Authors:  I Nalbantgil; R Onder; B Kiliçcioğlu; M Işler
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Electrocardiographic criteria for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in the presence of complete right bundle branch block.

Authors:  B Vandenberg; K Sagar; W Paulsen; D Romhilt
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in the presence of complete right bundle branch block.

Authors:  V De Leonardis; S A Goldstein; J Lindsay
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1988-09-15       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Improved sex-specific criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy for clinical and computer interpretation of electrocardiograms: validation with autopsy findings.

Authors:  P N Casale; R B Devereux; D R Alonso; E Campo; P Kligfield
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

1.  Osteogenic circulating endothelial progenitor cells are linked to electrocardiographic conduction abnormalities in rheumatic patients.

Authors:  Yap-Hang Chan; Michael Cheong Ngai; Yan Chen; Mei-Zhen Wu; Yu-Juan Yu; Zhe Zhen; Kevin Lai; Tommy Cheung; Lai-Ming Ho; Ho-Yin Chung; Chak-Sing Lau; Chu-Pak Lau; Hung-Fat Tse; Kai-Hang Yiu
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Right-ventricular enlargement in arrhythmogenic right-ventricular cardiomyopathy is associated with decreased QRS amplitudes and T-wave negativity.

Authors:  Robbert Zusterzeel; Rachel M A Ter Bekke; Paul G A Volders; Farah M M Leijten; Arthur van den Wijngaard; Jan Serroyen; Anton P M Gorgels
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 1.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.