Literature DB >> 16846330

Temporal framing and the decision to take part in type 2 diabetes screening: effects of individual differences in consideration of future consequences on persuasion.

Sheina Orbell1, Martin Hagger.   

Abstract

Reliable individual differences in the extent to which people consider the long- and short-term consequences of their own behaviors are hypothesized to influence the impact of a persuasive communication. In a field experiment, the time frame of occurrence of positive and negative consequences of taking part in a proposed Type 2 diabetes screening program was manipulated in a sample of 210 adults with a mean age of 53 years. Individual differences in consideration of future consequences (CFC; A. Strathman, F. Gleicher, D. S. Boninger, & C. S. Edwards, 1994) moderated (a) the generation of positive and negative thoughts and (b) the persuasive impact of the different communications. Low-CFC individuals were more persuaded when positive consequences were short term and negative consequences were long term. The opposite was true of high-CFC individuals. Path analyses show that net positive thoughts generated mediated the effect of the CFC x Time Frame manipulations on behavioral intentions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16846330     DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.4.537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  9 in total

1.  Spontaneous reactions to health risk feedback: a network perspective.

Authors:  Martina Panzer; Britta Renner
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-02-18

2.  Time orientation and health-related behaviour: measurement in general population samples.

Authors:  Rachel A Crockett; John Weinman; Matthew Hankins; Theresa Marteau
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2009-03

3.  Parental Support for HPV Vaccination Mandates Among African Americans: The Impact of Message Framing and Consideration of Future Consequences.

Authors:  Xiaoli Nan; Kelly Daily; Adam Richards; Cheryl Holt
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2018-07-06

4.  Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): randomised trial.

Authors:  Theresa M Marteau; Eleanor Mann; A Toby Prevost; Joana C Vasconcelos; Ian Kellar; Simon Sanderson; Michael Parker; Simon Griffin; Stephen Sutton; Ann Louise Kinmonth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-05-13

5.  Understandings of disease among Pacific peoples with diabetes and end-stage renal disease in New Zealand.

Authors:  Jacqueline Schmidt-Busby; Janine Wiles; Daniel Exeter; Timothy Kenealy
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Responses to procedural information about colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood testing: the role of consideration of future consequences.

Authors:  Christian von Wagner; Anna Good; Samuel G Smith; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Social patterning of screening uptake and the impact of facilitating informed choices: psychological and ethical analyses.

Authors:  Rachel Crockett; Timothy M Wilkinson; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-06-28

Review 8.  Social cognitive determinants of ecstasy use to target in evidence-based interventions: a meta-analytical review.

Authors:  Gjalt-Jorn Y Peters; Gerjo Kok; Charles Abraham
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Decision Making in the PICU: An Examination of Factors Influencing Participation Decisions in Phase III Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Laura E Slosky; Marilyn Stern; Natasha L Burke; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2014-08-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.