Literature DB >> 16844448

Ureteral stents: coil strength and durometer.

Kari Hendlin1, Kelly Dockendorf, Christina Horn, Nicole Pshon, Brynn Lund, Manoj Monga.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the coil strength before and after urine exposure and the stiffness of commercially available double-J ureteral stents because both properties may affect stent performance and patient comfort.
METHODS: Twelve commercially available 6F ureteral stents were tested for coil strength before and after 30 days of urine exposure. The proximal end of each stent was inserted through a 2-mm hole in bologna, allowed to recoil, and then pulled using a handheld force gauge. Ten different commercially available ureteral stent models were tested for tensile strength using an MTS MicroBionix Testing System and Testworks II software and a 5 N load cell.
RESULTS: The Cook Black Silicone and Cook C-Flex stents had the strongest coil strengths before urine exposure at 0.480 +/- 0.0 lb (P < or = 0.0006) and were also the stents that had the greatest decrease in coil strength after urine exposure. After urine exposure, the weakest stent was the Applied Vertex stent at 0.088 +/- 0.008 lb (P < or = 0.02) and the strongest was the Cook Endo-Sof AQ at 0.223 +/- 0.014 lb (P < or = 0.03). Calculating the Young's modulus, E, the Cook C-Flex stent was the stiffest (E = 1472 +/- 196 KPa) and the Cook Black Silicone was the least stiff (E = 122 +/- 18 KPa). The stent models that demonstrated consistent E values across different lot numbers were the Circon Double J stent and Bard InLay.
CONCLUSIONS: Ureteral stents can be differentiated according to their coil strength and stiffness. The impact of these properties on stent performance and patient comfort deserve additional evaluation. The significant variability found in stent stiffness among stents from different lot numbers suggests poor quality assurance in biomaterials or stent processing and increases the complexity of cross-stent comparisons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16844448     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

1.  The correlation between durometer score and modified Rodnan skin score in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Ki Won Moon; Ran Song; Jin Hyun Kim; Eun Young Lee; Eun Bong Lee; Yeong Wook Song
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Size does matter: ureteral stents with a smaller diameter show advantages regarding urinary symptoms, pain levels and general health.

Authors:  Sebastian Nestler; B Witte; L Schilchegger; J Jones
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Ureteral stent symptoms and associated infections: a biomaterials perspective.

Authors:  Ben H Chew; Dirk Lange
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Intelligent Optimization of the Film-to-Fiber Ratio of a Degradable Braided Bicomponent Ureteral Stent.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Liu; Feng Li; Yongsheng Ding; Ting Zou; Lu Wang; Kuangrong Hao
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Surface analysis of ureteral stent before and after implantation in the bodies of child patients.

Authors:  Katarzyna Arkusz; Kamila Pasik; Andrzej Halinski; Adam Halinski
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  Advances in Ureteral Stent Design and Materials.

Authors:  Ali Mosayyebi; Costantino Manes; Dario Carugo; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.092

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.