V Fauveau1, L de Bernis. 1. Technical Support Division, UNFPA Geneva, Switzerland. fauveau@unfpa.org
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: As countries are designing and implementing strategies to address maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity (Millennium Development Goals 5 and 4), it appears that a large number of evidence-based obstetric practices are not used in many settings, and this is a major obstacle to the improvement of quality obstetric care. OBJECTIVES: To remind readers of the existing, relatively easy-to-implement, evidence-based interventions that are currently not being universally applied in obstetric care and, second, to foster research to expand the evidence base further for obstetric care practices and devices, especially those that could be used in resource-poor settings. METHODS: We review possible reasons why changes into practices are difficult to obtain, and we list the key evidence-based interventions known to effectively deal with the main obstetric complications, with supporting references and sources of documentation. We also list some promising interventions that require more research before being recommended. CONCLUSION: Professionals and health services managers have a crucial role in producing the best quality obstetric and neonatal care through implementing the listed evidence-based interventions and make them accessible to all pregnant women and their newborns without delay, even in poor settings. Reasons for which progress is slow should be addressed. One of these reasons being the lack of access to scientific knowledge from the part of professionals in developing countries, we give the key references and also websites which are freely accessible through the Internet. It is hoped that this paper will stimulate the discussion on the dissemination and use of good obstetric practices, and contribute to better maternal and newborn health.
INTRODUCTION: As countries are designing and implementing strategies to address maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity (Millennium Development Goals 5 and 4), it appears that a large number of evidence-based obstetric practices are not used in many settings, and this is a major obstacle to the improvement of quality obstetric care. OBJECTIVES: To remind readers of the existing, relatively easy-to-implement, evidence-based interventions that are currently not being universally applied in obstetric care and, second, to foster research to expand the evidence base further for obstetric care practices and devices, especially those that could be used in resource-poor settings. METHODS: We review possible reasons why changes into practices are difficult to obtain, and we list the key evidence-based interventions known to effectively deal with the main obstetric complications, with supporting references and sources of documentation. We also list some promising interventions that require more research before being recommended. CONCLUSION: Professionals and health services managers have a crucial role in producing the best quality obstetric and neonatal care through implementing the listed evidence-based interventions and make them accessible to all pregnant women and their newborns without delay, even in poor settings. Reasons for which progress is slow should be addressed. One of these reasons being the lack of access to scientific knowledge from the part of professionals in developing countries, we give the key references and also websites which are freely accessible through the Internet. It is hoped that this paper will stimulate the discussion on the dissemination and use of good obstetric practices, and contribute to better maternal and newborn health.
Authors: Charles A Ameh; Robert Kerr; Barbara Madaj; Mselenge Mdegela; Terry Kana; Susan Jones; Jaki Lambert; Fiona Dickinson; Sarah White; Nynke van den Broek Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Juliana Jacques da Costa Monguilhott; Odaléa Maria Brüggemann; Paulo Fontoura Freitas; Eleonora d'Orsi Journal: Rev Saude Publica Date: 2018-01-18 Impact factor: 2.106
Authors: Linda Vesel; Alexander Manu; Terhi J Lohela; Sabine Gabrysch; Eunice Okyere; Augustinus H A Ten Asbroek; Zelee Hill; Charlotte Tawiah Agyemang; Seth Owusu-Agyei; Betty R Kirkwood Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Henry D Kalter; Asma Gali Yaroh; Abdou Maina; Alain K Koffi; Khaled Bensaïd; Agbessi Amouzou; Robert E Black Journal: J Glob Health Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 4.413