Literature DB >> 16844125

"Good obstetrics" revisited: too many evidence-based practices and devices are not used.

V Fauveau1, L de Bernis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: As countries are designing and implementing strategies to address maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity (Millennium Development Goals 5 and 4), it appears that a large number of evidence-based obstetric practices are not used in many settings, and this is a major obstacle to the improvement of quality obstetric care.
OBJECTIVES: To remind readers of the existing, relatively easy-to-implement, evidence-based interventions that are currently not being universally applied in obstetric care and, second, to foster research to expand the evidence base further for obstetric care practices and devices, especially those that could be used in resource-poor settings.
METHODS: We review possible reasons why changes into practices are difficult to obtain, and we list the key evidence-based interventions known to effectively deal with the main obstetric complications, with supporting references and sources of documentation. We also list some promising interventions that require more research before being recommended.
CONCLUSION: Professionals and health services managers have a crucial role in producing the best quality obstetric and neonatal care through implementing the listed evidence-based interventions and make them accessible to all pregnant women and their newborns without delay, even in poor settings. Reasons for which progress is slow should be addressed. One of these reasons being the lack of access to scientific knowledge from the part of professionals in developing countries, we give the key references and also websites which are freely accessible through the Internet. It is hoped that this paper will stimulate the discussion on the dissemination and use of good obstetric practices, and contribute to better maternal and newborn health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16844125     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  15 in total

1.  Monitoring severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia treatment in resource poor countries: skilled birth attendant perception of a new treatment and monitoring chart (LIVKAN chart).

Authors:  Charles A Ameh; Christine I Ekechi; Jamilu Tukur
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-07

2.  Can hospital audit teams identify case management problems, analyse their causes, identify and implement improvements? A cross-sectional process evaluation of obstetric near-miss case reviews in Benin.

Authors:  Matthias Borchert; Sourou Goufodji; Eusèbe Alihonou; Thérèse Delvaux; Jacques Saizonou; Lydie Kanhonou; Véronique Filippi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Rural/urban and socioeconomic differentials in quality of antenatal care in Ghana.

Authors:  Patience A Afulani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Knowledge and Skills of Healthcare Providers in Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia before and after Competency-Based Training in Emergency Obstetric and Early Newborn Care.

Authors:  Charles A Ameh; Robert Kerr; Barbara Madaj; Mselenge Mdegela; Terry Kana; Susan Jones; Jaki Lambert; Fiona Dickinson; Sarah White; Nynke van den Broek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Can a simulation-based training program impact the use of evidence based routine practices at birth? Results of a hospital-based cluster randomized trial in Mexico.

Authors:  Jimena Fritz; Dilys M Walker; Susanna Cohen; Gustavo Angeles; Hector Lamadrid-Figueroa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil.

Authors:  Juliana Jacques da Costa Monguilhott; Odaléa Maria Brüggemann; Paulo Fontoura Freitas; Eleonora d'Orsi
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.106

7.  Quality of newborn care: a health facility assessment in rural Ghana using survey, vignette and surveillance data.

Authors:  Linda Vesel; Alexander Manu; Terhi J Lohela; Sabine Gabrysch; Eunice Okyere; Augustinus H A Ten Asbroek; Zelee Hill; Charlotte Tawiah Agyemang; Seth Owusu-Agyei; Betty R Kirkwood
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Reasons for performing a caesarean section in public hospitals in rural Bangladesh.

Authors:  Mamuda Aminu; Bettina Utz; Abdul Halim; Nynke van den Broek
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Verbal/social autopsy study helps explain the lack of decrease in neonatal mortality in Niger, 2007-2010.

Authors:  Henry D Kalter; Asma Gali Yaroh; Abdou Maina; Alain K Koffi; Khaled Bensaïd; Agbessi Amouzou; Robert E Black
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.413

10.  Service readiness, health facility management practices, and delivery care utilization in five states of Nigeria: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Anastasia J Gage; Onyebuchi Ilombu; Akanni Ibukun Akinyemi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.