Literature DB >> 16843078

Molecular imaging promotes progress in orthopedic research.

Philipp Mayer-Kuckuk1, Adele L Boskey2.   

Abstract

Modern orthopedic research is directed towards the understanding of molecular mechanisms that determine development, maintenance and health of musculoskeletal tissues. In recent years, many genetic and proteomic discoveries have been made which necessitate investigation under physiological conditions in intact, living tissues. Molecular imaging can meet this demand and is, in fact, the only strategy currently available for noninvasive, quantitative, real-time biology studies in living subjects. In this review, techniques of molecular imaging are summarized, and applications to bone and joint biology are presented. The imaging modality most frequently used in the past was optical imaging, particularly bioluminescence and near-infrared fluorescence imaging. Alternate technologies including nuclear and magnetic resonance imaging were also employed. Orthopedic researchers have applied molecular imaging to murine models including transgenic mice to monitor gene expression, protein degradation, cell migration and cell death. Within the bone compartment, osteoblasts and their stem cells have been investigated, and the organic and mineral bone phases have been assessed. These studies addressed malignancy and injury as well as repair, including fracture healing and cell/gene therapy for skeletal defects. In the joints, molecular imaging has focused on the inflammatory and tissue destructive processes that cause arthritis. As described in this review, the feasibility of applying molecular imaging to numerous areas of orthopedic research has been demonstrated and will likely result in an increase in research dedicated to this powerful strategy. Molecular imaging holds great promise in the future for preclinical orthopedic research as well as next-generation clinical musculoskeletal diagnostics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16843078     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  15 in total

1.  In vivo magnetic resonance imaging and optical imaging comparison of viable and nonviable mesenchymal stem cells with a bifunctional label.

Authors:  Elizabeth Jane Sutton; Tobias D Henning; Sophie Boddington; Stavros Demos; Christian Krug; Reinhardt Meier; John Kornak; Shoujun Zhao; Rick Baehner; Sheida Sharifi; Heike Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.488

2.  (68)Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 PET imaging capable of demonstrating the phase of inflammation in healing bones and the progress of infection in osteomyelitic bones.

Authors:  Petteri Lankinen; Tatu J Mäkinen; Tiina A Pöyhönen; Pauliina Virsu; Satu Salomäki; Antti J Hakanen; Sirpa Jalkanen; Hannu T Aro; Anne Roivainen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Noninvasive Raman tomographic imaging of canine bone tissue.

Authors:  Matthew V Schulmerich; Jacqueline H Cole; Kathryn A Dooley; Michael D Morris; Jaclynn M Kreider; Steven A Goldstein; Subhadra Srinivasan; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Specific, Sensitive, and Stable Reporting of Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Chondrogenesis.

Authors:  Rodolfo E De la Vega; Maximiliano Scheu; Lennart A Brown; Christopher H Evans; Elisabeth Ferreira; Ryan M Porter
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 5.  Advances in multimodality molecular imaging of bone structure and function.

Authors:  Floor M Lambers; Gisela Kuhn; Ralph Müller
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2012-02-22

6.  Pro416Arg cherubism mutation in Sh3bp2 knock-in mice affects osteoblasts and alters bone mineral and matrix properties.

Authors:  Chiachien J Wang; I-Ping Chen; Boguslawa Koczon-Jaremko; Adele L Boskey; Yasuyoshi Ueki; Liisa Kuhn; Ernst J Reichenberger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Near-infrared imaging method for the in vivo assessment of the biodistribution of nanoporous silicon particles.

Authors:  Ennio Tasciotti; Biana Godin; Jonathan O Martinez; Ciro Chiappini; Rohan Bhavane; Xuewu Liu; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.488

8.  Molecular imaging of expression of vascular endothelial growth factor a (VEGF a) in femoral bone grafts transplanted into living mice.

Authors:  Olga Strachna; Daniel Torrecilla; Marie K Reumann; Inna Serganova; Jihye Kim; Simone Gieschler; Adele L Boskey; Ronald G Blasberg; Philipp Mayer-Kuckuk
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Sequential in vivo imaging of osteogenic stem/progenitor cells during fracture repair.

Authors:  Dongsu Park; Joel A Spencer; Charles P Lin; David T Scadden
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 10.  Musculoskeletal molecular imaging: a comprehensive overview.

Authors:  Marie K Reumann; Mitchell C Weiser; Philipp Mayer-Kuckuk
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 19.536

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.