Literature DB >> 16842867

Animal neuropsychology: validation of the Intra-Dimensional Extra-Dimensional set shifting task for mice.

Joseph P Garner1, Collette M Thogerson, Hanno Würbel, James D Murray, Joy A Mench.   

Abstract

Research in animal neuropsychology is providing an exciting new generation of behavioral tests for mice that promise to overcome many of the limitations of current high-throughput testing, and provide direct animal homologues of clinically important measures in human research. Set shifting tasks are some of the best understood and widely used human neuropsychological tasks, with clinical relevance to traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia, autism, obsessive compulsive disorder, trichotillomania, and many other disorders. Here we report the first successful modification of a human set shifting neuropsychological task, the Intra-Dimensional Extra-Dimensional (IDED) task, for use with mice. We presented mice with a series of compound discrimination and reversal tasks where one stimulus dimension consistently cued reward. Task performance improved with a new set of compound stimuli, as did reversal performance--indicating the formation of a cognitive-attentional set. We then overtrained a subset of the mice, and presented control and overtrained mice with a new compound discrimination where a novel stimulus dimension cued reward. As is the case in human control subjects, control mice persisted in responding to the now-incorrect stimulus dimension, performing poorly on this extra-dimensional shift compared with the previous intra-dimensional shift, thereby validating the task as a measure of set shifting. Furthermore, overtrained mice were impaired on this extra-dimensional shift compared with controls, further validating the task. The advantages and disadvantages of the IDED task compared to high-throughput approaches are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16842867     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  62 in total

1.  Discrimination learning and attentional set formation in a mouse model of Fragile X.

Authors:  Kimberly S Casten; Annette C Gray; Rebecca D Burwell
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Ensemble recordings in awake rats: achieving behavioral regularity during multimodal stimulus processing and discriminative learning.

Authors:  Eunjeong Lee; Ana I Oliveira-Ferreira; Ed de Water; Hans Gerritsen; Mattijs C Bakker; Jan A W Kalwij; Tjerk van Goudoever; Wietze H Buster; Cyriel M A Pennartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Translational Assays for Assessment of Cognition in Rodent Models of Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia.

Authors:  A Shepherd; S Tyebji; A J Hannan; E L Burrows
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.444

Review 4.  Early pharmacological treatment of autism: a rationale for developmental treatment.

Authors:  Terrence C Bethea; Linmarie Sikich
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 13.382

5.  Centella asiatica attenuates hippocampal mitochondrial dysfunction and improves memory and executive function in β-amyloid overexpressing mice.

Authors:  Nora E Gray; Jonathan A Zweig; Maya Caruso; Jennifer Y Zhu; Kirsten M Wright; Joseph F Quinn; Amala Soumyanath
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 4.314

6.  Double dissociation of attentional resources: prefrontal versus cingulate cortices.

Authors:  Chi-Wing Ng; Maria I Noblejas; Joshua S Rodefer; Christina B Smith; Amy Poremba
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Behavioural assays to model cognitive and affective dimensions of depression and anxiety in rats.

Authors:  M D S Lapiz-Bluhm; C O Bondi; J Doyen; G A Rodriguez; T Bédard-Arana; D A Morilak
Journal:  J Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 3.627

8.  Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Stephan Waldert; Ad Aertsen; Daniel M Wolpert; Carsten Mehring
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Predictably irrational: assaying cognitive inflexibility in mouse models of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jonathan L Brigman; Carolyn Graybeal; Andrew Holmes
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 10.  Structure learning in action.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Carsten Mehring; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.