Literature DB >> 16842789

Cesarean section by choice: constructing a reproductive rights framework for the debate.

Jan E Christilaw1.   

Abstract

The question of cesarean section by choice (that is, cesarean delivery in the absence of medical indications) has been hotly debated by the obstetrical profession in recent years. The debate has focused around questions of risks and benefits, and has revolved around questions of obstetrical practice. In this paper, the question will be framed in a reproductive rights context. How does the phenomenon of CSBC (cesarean section by choice) impact women's empowerment? Which reproductive rights might be affected by this question, and what policies are related to its use? FIGO's 1998 statement "Ethical Aspects regarding Cesarean Delivery for Non-Medical Reasons" is revisited, and, in light of these considerations, its contents are endorsed once again.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16842789     DOI： 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN： 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  11 in total

1.  Birthing ethics: what mothers, families, childbirth educators, nurses, and physicians should know about the ethics of childbirth.

Authors:  Jennifer M Torres; Raymond G De Vries
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2009

2.  Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health.

Authors:  J P Souza; Am Gülmezoglu; P Lumbiganon; M Laopaiboon; G Carroli; B Fawole; P Ruyan
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 8.775

3.  Developing criteria for cesarean section using the RAND appropriateness method.

Authors:  Rahim Ostovar; Arash Rashidian; Abolghasem Pourreza; Batool Hossein Rashidi; Sedigheh Hantooshzadeh; Hassan Eftekhar Ardebili; Mahmood Mahmoudi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Obstetrical providers' preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  J C Rivo; M Amyx; V Pingray; R A Casale; A E Fiorillo; H B Krupitzki; J D Malamud; M Mendilaharzu; M L Medina; A B Del Pino; L Ribola; J A Schvartzman; G M Tartalo; M Trasmonte; S Varela; F Althabe; J M Belizán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Maternal Choice in the UK Should Be Promoted Despite the Current Era of Financial Austerity.

Authors:  Samuel G Oxley; Eric Edison
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2012-11-20

6.  Trend and socio-demographic differentials of Caesarean section rate in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: analysis based on Ethiopia demographic and health surveys data.

Authors:  Samson Gebremedhin
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 7.  Neonatal Immune System Ontogeny: The Role of Maternal Microbiota and Associated Factors. How Might the Non-Human Primate Model Enlighten the Path?

Authors:  Natalia Nunez; Louis Réot; Elisabeth Menu
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-01

8.  Cesarean delivery on maternal request: can the ethical problem be solved by the principlist approach?

Authors:  Tore Nilstun; Marwan Habiba; Göran Lingman; Rodolfo Saracci; Monica Da Frè; Marina Cuttini
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Cesarean delivery among women who gave birth in Dessie town hospitals, Northeast Ethiopia.

Authors:  Awoke Giletew Wondie; Atinkut Alamirrew Zeleke; Hedija Yenus; Gizachew Assefa Tessema
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Moderating effect of mode of delivery on the genetics of intelligence: Explorative genome-wide analyses in ALSPAC.

Authors:  Dinka Smajlagić; Kaya Kvarme Jacobsen; Craig Myrum; Jan Haavik; Stefan Johansson; Tetyana Zayats
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.708
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.