N S Abraham1, D C Cohen, B Rivers, P Richardson. 1. Houston Center for Quality of Care and Utilization Studies, Section of Health Services Research, Houston, TX, USA. nabraham@bcm.tmc.edu
Abstract
AIMS: To validate veterans affairs (VA) administrative data for the diagnosis of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related upper gastrointestinal events (UGIE) and to develop a diagnostic algorithm. METHODS: A retrospective study of veterans prescribed an NSAID as identified from the national pharmacy database merged with in-patient and out-patient data, followed by primary chart abstraction. Contingency tables were constructed to allow comparison with a random sample of patients prescribed an NSAID, but without UGIE. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to derive a predictive algorithm. Once derived, the algorithm was validated in a separate cohort of veterans. RESULTS: Of 906 patients, 606 had a diagnostic code for UGIE; 300 were a random subsample of 11 744 patients (control). Only 161 had a confirmed UGIE. The positive predictive value (PPV) of diagnostic codes was poor, but improved from 27% to 51% with the addition of endoscopic procedural codes. The strongest predictors of UGIE were an in-patient ICD-9 code for gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer and haemorrhage combined with upper endoscopy. This algorithm had a PPV of 73% when limited to patients >or=65 years (c-statistic 0.79). Validation of the algorithm revealed a PPV of 80% among patients with an overlapping NSAID prescription. CONCLUSIONS: NSAID-related UGIE can be assessed using VA administrative data. The optimal algorithm includes an in-patient ICD-9 code for gastric or duodenal ulcer and gastrointestinal bleeding combined with a procedural code for upper endoscopy.
AIMS: To validate veterans affairs (VA) administrative data for the diagnosis of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related upper gastrointestinal events (UGIE) and to develop a diagnostic algorithm. METHODS: A retrospective study of veterans prescribed an NSAID as identified from the national pharmacy database merged with in-patient and out-patient data, followed by primary chart abstraction. Contingency tables were constructed to allow comparison with a random sample of patients prescribed an NSAID, but without UGIE. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to derive a predictive algorithm. Once derived, the algorithm was validated in a separate cohort of veterans. RESULTS: Of 906 patients, 606 had a diagnostic code for UGIE; 300 were a random subsample of 11 744 patients (control). Only 161 had a confirmed UGIE. The positive predictive value (PPV) of diagnostic codes was poor, but improved from 27% to 51% with the addition of endoscopic procedural codes. The strongest predictors of UGIE were an in-patient ICD-9 code for gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer and haemorrhage combined with upper endoscopy. This algorithm had a PPV of 73% when limited to patients >or=65 years (c-statistic 0.79). Validation of the algorithm revealed a PPV of 80% among patients with an overlapping NSAID prescription. CONCLUSIONS: NSAID-related UGIE can be assessed using VA administrative data. The optimal algorithm includes an in-patient ICD-9 code for gastric or duodenal ulcer and gastrointestinal bleeding combined with a procedural code for upper endoscopy.
Authors: Kevin Beier; Sabitha Eppanapally; Heidi S Bazick; Domingo Chang; Karthik Mahadevappa; Fiona K Gibbons; Kenneth B Christopher Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Ju-Yeh Yang; Tsung-Chun Lee; Maria E Montez-Rath; Jane Paik; Glenn M Chertow; Manisha Desai; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-01-19 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Robert P Myers; Abdel Aziz M Shaheen; Andrew Fong; Alex F Wan; Mark G Swain; Robert J Hilsden; Lloyd Sutherland; Hude Quan Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.522
Authors: Jeffrey R Curtis; Shih-Yin Chen; Winifred Werther; Ani John; David A Johnson Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2011-08-27 Impact factor: 2.890