BACKGROUND: Some, but not all studies have provided evidence that the CagA status of Helicobacter pylori strains is a predictive factor for the outcome of eradication therapy. AIM: To clarify the association between CagA status and eradication outcome. METHODS: We included studies reporting the numbers of successful and failed cases in H. pylori-eradication therapy according to the CagA status. Fourteen studies (1529 patients) were included of 325 articles identified in the search. The pooled risk ratio for H. pylori-eradication failure in CagA-negative relative to CagA-positive strains and the pooled risk difference in eradication success between the two groups were used as summary statistics. Meta-regression was used for examining the source of heterogeneity. RESULTS: The summary risk ratio for eradication failure in CagA-negative relative to CagA-positive was 2.0 (95% CI: 1.6-2.4, P < 0.001), corresponding with the summary risk difference for eradication success between the groups of 11% (95% CI: 3-19%, P = 0.011). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that usage of polymerase chain reaction examination for CagA status and a high proportion of non-ulcer dyspepsia patients were factors for heterogeneity among studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis confirmed the importance of the presence of CagA as a predictor for successful eradication of H. pylori.
BACKGROUND: Some, but not all studies have provided evidence that the CagA status of Helicobacter pylori strains is a predictive factor for the outcome of eradication therapy. AIM: To clarify the association between CagA status and eradication outcome. METHODS: We included studies reporting the numbers of successful and failed cases in H. pylori-eradication therapy according to the CagA status. Fourteen studies (1529 patients) were included of 325 articles identified in the search. The pooled risk ratio for H. pylori-eradication failure in CagA-negative relative to CagA-positive strains and the pooled risk difference in eradication success between the two groups were used as summary statistics. Meta-regression was used for examining the source of heterogeneity. RESULTS: The summary risk ratio for eradication failure in CagA-negative relative to CagA-positive was 2.0 (95% CI: 1.6-2.4, P < 0.001), corresponding with the summary risk difference for eradication success between the groups of 11% (95% CI: 3-19%, P = 0.011). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that usage of polymerase chain reaction examination for CagA status and a high proportion of non-ulcer dyspepsiapatients were factors for heterogeneity among studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis confirmed the importance of the presence of CagA as a predictor for successful eradication of H. pylori.
Authors: Nasser Amjad; Hussain Ali Osman; Najibah Abdul Razak; Junaini Kassian; Jeffri Din; Nasuruddin bin Abdullah Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: M Constanza Camargo; Apolinaria García; Arnoldo Riquelme; William Otero; Claudia A Camargo; Tomas Hernandez-García; Roberto Candia; Michael G Bruce; Charles S Rabkin Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-03-04 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Ju Yup Lee; Nayoung Kim; Min Soo Kim; Yoon Jin Choi; Jung Won Lee; Hyuk Yoon; Cheol Min Shin; Young Soo Park; Dong Ho Lee; Hyun Chae Jung Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: M Constanza Camargo; M Blanca Piazuelo; Robertino M Mera; Elizabeth T H Fontham; Alberto G Delgado; M Clara Yepez; Cristina Ceron; Luis E Bravo; Juan C Bravo; Pelayo Correa Journal: Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam Date: 2007-12