OBJECTIVE: This article describes the method and intake findings of the Brown Longitudinal Obsessive Compulsive Study, the first comprehensive prospective investigation of the naturalistic course of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in a large clinical sample using longitudinal research methodology. METHOD: Intake data, collected between June 2001 and October 2004, are presented for 293 adult participants in a prospective, naturalistic study of OCD. Participants had a primary diagnosis of DSM-IV OCD and had sought treatment for the disorder. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that OCD typically has a gradual onset and a continuous course regardless of age at onset. There is a substantial lag between the onset of the disorder and initiation of treatment. OCD, which almost always coexists with other psychiatric symptoms, leads to serious social and occupational impairment. Compared with participants with late-onset OCD, early-onset participants had higher rates of lifetime panic disorder, eating disorders, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder. The groups also differed on the types of obsessive-compulsive symptoms that were first noticed, as well as on rates of current obsessions and compulsions. CONCLUSION: The demographics, clinical characteristics, comorbidity rates, and symptom presentation of the sample are consistent with those reported for cross-sectional studies of OCD, including the DSM-IV Field Trial. The current sample has a number of advantages over previously collected prospective samples of OCD in that it is large, diagnostically well characterized, recruited from multiple settings, and treatment seeking. This unique data set will contribute to the identification of meaningful phenotypes in OCD based on stability of symptom dimensions, prospective course patterns, and treatment response.
OBJECTIVE: This article describes the method and intake findings of the Brown Longitudinal Obsessive Compulsive Study, the first comprehensive prospective investigation of the naturalistic course of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in a large clinical sample using longitudinal research methodology. METHOD: Intake data, collected between June 2001 and October 2004, are presented for 293 adult participants in a prospective, naturalistic study of OCD. Participants had a primary diagnosis of DSM-IV OCD and had sought treatment for the disorder. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that OCD typically has a gradual onset and a continuous course regardless of age at onset. There is a substantial lag between the onset of the disorder and initiation of treatment. OCD, which almost always coexists with other psychiatric symptoms, leads to serious social and occupational impairment. Compared with participants with late-onset OCD, early-onset participants had higher rates of lifetime panic disorder, eating disorders, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder. The groups also differed on the types of obsessive-compulsive symptoms that were first noticed, as well as on rates of current obsessions and compulsions. CONCLUSION: The demographics, clinical characteristics, comorbidity rates, and symptom presentation of the sample are consistent with those reported for cross-sectional studies of OCD, including the DSM-IV Field Trial. The current sample has a number of advantages over previously collected prospective samples of OCD in that it is large, diagnostically well characterized, recruited from multiple settings, and treatment seeking. This unique data set will contribute to the identification of meaningful phenotypes in OCD based on stability of symptom dimensions, prospective course patterns, and treatment response.
Authors: G Nestadt; J Samuels; M A Riddle; K Y Liang; O J Bienvenu; R Hoehn-Saric; M Grados; B Cullen Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: C Wewetzer; T Jans; B Müller; A Neudörfl; U Bücherl; H Remschmidt; A Warnke; B Herpertz-Dahlmann Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: M C Rosario-Campos; J F Leckman; M T Mercadante; R G Shavitt; H S Prado; P Sada; D Zamignani; E C Miguel Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: J Samuels; G Nestadt; O J Bienvenu; P T Costa; M A Riddle; K Y Liang; R Hoehn-Saric; M A Grados; B A Cullen Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: G Nestadt; J Samuels; M Riddle; O J Bienvenu; K Y Liang; M LaBuda; J Walkup; M Grados; R Hoehn-Saric Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2000-04
Authors: Katharine A Phillips; Dan J Stein; Scott L Rauch; Eric Hollander; Brian A Fallon; Arthur Barsky; Naomi Fineberg; David Mataix-Cols; Ygor Arzeno Ferrão; Sanjaya Saxena; Sabine Wilhelm; Megan M Kelly; Lee Anna Clark; Anthony Pinto; O Joseph Bienvenu; Joanne Farrow; James Leckman Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Sarah L Garnaat; Christina L Boisseau; Agustin Yip; Nicholas J Sibrava; Benjamin D Greenberg; Maria C Mancebo; Nicole C R McLaughlin; Jane L Eisen; Steven A Rasmussen Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Nicholas J Sibrava; Christina L Boisseau; Maria C Mancebo; Jane L Eisen; Steven A Rasmussen Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2011-08-04 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Carly M Schwartzman; Christina L Boisseau; Nicholas J Sibrava; Maria C Mancebo; Jane L Eisen; Steven A Rasmussen Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2017-01-20 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Maria C Mancebo; Christina L Boisseau; Sarah L Garnaat; Jane L Eisen; Benjamin D Greenberg; Nicholas J Sibrava; Robert L Stout; Steven A Rasmussen Journal: Compr Psychiatry Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 3.735