Literature DB >> 16841415

Rotating platform knees: an emerging clinical standard: in opposition.

Mark W Pagnano1, R Micheal Menghini.   

Abstract

As surgeons, we share the common goals of making total knee arthroplasty as reliable, as reproducible, and as durable as we can. For that reason, we are almost compelled to investigate the rotating platform knee because of the contentions that it might improve patellar tracking, decrease lateral release rates, improve flexion, or perhaps give better wear characteristics over the long term. But when we take a step back and carefully examine the scientific data from 20 years of clinical experience with the rotating platform knee, the data speak for itself. To date, there are no demonstrated clinical advantages in regard to wear, survivorship, kinematics, range of motion, or patellar function. The rotating platform design then is really just another knee design, clinically indistinguishable from many well-functioning, fixed-bearing total knee designs.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16841415     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  3 in total

1.  Patellofemoral kinematics in mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing posterior stabilised total knee replacements: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  G Heinert; D Kendoff; S Preiss; T Gehrke; P Sussmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Rotating-platform TKA no different from fixed-bearing TKA regarding survivorship or performance: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Susan G Capps
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The INDUS knee prosthesis: Prospective multicentric trial of posteriorly stabilized high-flex design: Two years follow-up.

Authors:  Ashish Anand; A Ravi Raj
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.251

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.