Literature DB >> 16841235

Permuting input for more effective sampling of 3D conformer space.

Giorgio Carta1, Valeria Onnis, Andrew J S Knox, Darren Fayne, David G Lloyd.   

Abstract

SMILES strings and other classic 2D structural formats offer a convenient way to represent molecules as a simplistic connection table, with the inherent advantages of ease of handling and storage. In the context of virtual screening, chemical databases to be screened are often initially represented by canonicalised SMILES strings that can be filtered and pre-processed in a number of ways, resulting in molecules that occupy similar regions of chemical space to active compounds of a therapeutic target. A wide variety of software exists to convert molecules into SMILES format, namely, Mol2smi (Daylight Inc.), MOE (Chemical Computing Group) and Babel (Openeye Scientific Software). Depending on the algorithm employed, the atoms of a SMILES string defining a molecule can be ordered differently. Upon conversion to 3D coordinates they result in the production of ostensibly the same molecule. In this work we show how different permutations of a SMILES string can affect conformer generation, affecting reliability and repeatability of the results. Furthermore, we propose a novel procedure for the generation of conformers, taking advantage of the permutation of the input strings--both SMILES and other 2D formats, leading to more effective sampling of conformation space in output, and also implementing fingerprint and principal component analyses step to post process and visualise the results.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16841235     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-006-9044-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  10 in total

1.  The three-dimensional structures of antagonistic and agonistic forms of the glucocorticoid receptor ligand-binding domain: RU-486 induces a transconformation that leads to active antagonism.

Authors:  Björn Kauppi; Clarissa Jakob; Mathias Färnegårdh; Jie Yang; Harri Ahola; Maria Alarcon; Karin Calles; Owe Engström; John Harlan; Steven Muchmore; Anna-Karin Ramqvist; Susanne Thorell; Lars Ohman; Jonathan Greer; Jan-Ake Gustafsson; Jan Carlstedt-Duke; Mats Carlquist
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-04-09       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Multiple active site corrections for docking and virtual screening.

Authors:  Guy P A Vigers; James P Rizzi
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Reproducing the conformations of protein-bound ligands: a critical evaluation of several popular conformational searching tools.

Authors:  J Boström
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Assessing the performance of OMEGA with respect to retrieving bioactive conformations.

Authors:  Jonas Boström; Jeremy R Greenwood; Johan Gottfries
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.518

Review 5.  Recent development and application of virtual screening in drug discovery: an overview.

Authors:  Tingjun Hou; Xiaojie Xu
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.116

6.  Considerations in compound database preparation--"hidden" impact on virtual screening results.

Authors:  Andrew J S Knox; Mary J Meegan; Giorgio Carta; David G Lloyd
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Construction of a virtual combinatorial library using SMILES strings to discover potential structure-diverse PPAR modulators.

Authors:  Chenzhong Liao; Bing Liu; Leming Shi; Jiaju Zhou; Xian-Ping Lu
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 6.514

8.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm.

Authors:  M Rarey; B Kramer; T Lengauer; G Klebe
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-08-23       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking.

Authors:  G Jones; P Willett; R C Glen; A R Leach; R Taylor
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-04-04       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Structure of the PPARalpha and -gamma ligand binding domain in complex with AZ 242; ligand selectivity and agonist activation in the PPAR family.

Authors:  P Cronet; J F Petersen; R Folmer; N Blomberg; K Sjöblom; U Karlsson; E L Lindstedt; K Bamberg
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.006

  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of the performance of 3D virtual screening protocols: RMSD comparisons, enrichment assessments, and decoy selection--what can we learn from earlier mistakes?

Authors:  Johannes Kirchmair; Patrick Markt; Simona Distinto; Gerhard Wolber; Thierry Langer
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  StackPR is a new computational approach for large-scale identification of progesterone receptor antagonists using the stacking strategy.

Authors:  Nalini Schaduangrat; Nuttapat Anuwongcharoen; Mohammad Ali Moni; Pietro Lio'; Phasit Charoenkwan; Watshara Shoombuatong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.