Literature DB >> 16841174

Distorting gene pools by conservation: Assessing the case of doomed turtle eggs.

N Mrosovsky1.   

Abstract

Sea turtles have a high reproductive output and high mortality at early stages of the life cycle. In particular, many nests are laid below or close to high tide lines, and subsequently large numbers of eggs may be inundated and destroyed. A common conservation procedure is to relocate such doomed eggs to higher ground. This article examines this practice in the light of recent data revealing that some individual turtles tend to nest relatively near the water and others relatively higher up the beach. Discussion is focused on the question of why apparently poor placement of nests has not been selected against. Comparison between the ecology of leatherback and hawksbill turtle nesting beaches suggests that predictability of environmental conditions on the nesting beaches has an important influence on patterns of nest-site selection. Options are outlined for the management of nesting beaches where a high proportion of turtle eggs is subject to destruction by flooding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16841174     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-005-0348-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  7 in total

1.  Evolutionary biology: the cod that got away.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Hutchings
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Ecology. Ecology for a crowded planet.

Authors:  Margaret Palmer; Emily Bernhardt; Elizabeth Chornesky; Scott Collins; Andrew Dobson; Clifford Duke; Barry Gold; Robert Jacobson; Sharon Kingsland; Rhonda Kranz; Michael Mappin; M Luisa Martinez; Fiorenza Micheli; Jennifer Morse; Michael Pace; Mercedes Pascual; Stephen Palumbi; O J Reichman; Ashley Simons; Alan Townsend; Monica Turner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Reproduction and conservation of the leatherback turtle Dermochelys coriacea (Testudines: Dermochelyidae) in Gandoca, Costa Rica.

Authors:  D Chacón; W McLarney; C Ampie; B Venegas
Journal:  Rev Biol Trop       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 0.723

4.  Wavelength preferences and brightness cues in the water finding behaviour of sea turtles.

Authors:  N Mrosovsky; S J Shettleworth
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 1.991

Review 5.  Interventions for wildlife health, conservation and welfare.

Authors:  J K Kirkwood
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1993-03-06       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  The effects of nest environment on calcium mobilization by leatherback turtle embryos (Dermochelys coriacea) during development.

Authors:  J J Bilinski; R D Reina; J R Spotila; F V Paladino
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.320

7.  Maturation trends indicative of rapid evolution preceded the collapse of northern cod.

Authors:  Esben M Olsen; Mikko Heino; George R Lilly; M Joanne Morgan; John Brattey; Bruno Ernande; Ulf Dieckmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 49.962

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  The benefits of nest relocation extend far beyond recruitment: a rejoinder to Mrosovsky.

Authors:  David A Pike
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Against oversimplifying the issues on relocating turtle eggs.

Authors:  Nicholas Mrosovsky
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Potential limitations of behavioral plasticity and the role of egg relocation in climate change mitigation for a thermally sensitive endangered species.

Authors:  Michael J Liles; Tarla Rai Peterson; Jeffrey A Seminoff; Alexander R Gaos; Eduardo Altamirano; Ana V Henríquez; Velkiss Gadea; Sofía Chavarría; José Urteaga; Bryan P Wallace; Markus J Peterson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.912

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.