Literature DB >> 16839321

Psychosocial outcomes and drug attributes affecting treatment choice in men receiving sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: results of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study.

John Dean1, Geoffrey I Hackett2, Vincezo Gentile3, Furio Pirozzi-Farina4, Raymond C Rosen5, Yanli Zhao6, Margaret R Warner6, Anthony Beardsworth7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although sildenafil citrate (sildenafil) and tadalafil are efficacious and well-tolerated treatments for erectile dysfunction (ED), preference studies have shown that patients may favor one medication over the other. AIM: To determine whether psychosocial outcomes differed when men with ED received tadalafil compared with sildenafil. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures included a treatment preference question, Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales (PAIRS), and Drug Attribute Questionnaire.
METHODS: Randomized, open-label, crossover study. After a 4-week baseline, men with ED (N = 367; mean age = 54 years; naïve to type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitor therapy) were randomized: tadalafil for 12 weeks then sildenafil for 12 weeks or vice versa (8-week dose optimization/4-week assessment phases). During dose optimization, patients started with 10 mg tadalafil, or 25 or 50 mg sildenafil and could titrate to their optimal dose (10 or 20 mg tadalafil; 25, 50, or 100 mg sildenafil). Medications were taken as needed. Patients completing both 12-week periods chose which medication to continue during an 8-week extension.
RESULTS: Of 291 men completing both treatment periods, 71% (N = 206) chose tadalafil and 29% (N = 85) chose sildenafil (P < 0.001) for the 8-week extension. When taking tadalafil compared with sildenafil men had higher mean endpoint scores on PAIRS Sexual Self-Confidence (tadalafil = 2.91 vs. sildenafil = 2.75; P < 0.001) and Spontaneity (tadalafil = 3.32 vs. sildenafil = 3.17; P < 0.001) Domains and a lower mean endpoint score on Time Concerns Domain (tadalafil = 2.2 vs. sildenafil = 2.59; P < 0.001). The two most frequently chosen drug attributes to explain treatment preference were ability to get an erection long after taking the medication and firmness of erections. Tadalafil and sildenafil were well tolerated with 12 (3.3%) patients discontinuing for an adverse event.
CONCLUSIONS: As measured with PAIRS, men with ED had higher sexual self-confidence and spontaneity and less time concerns related to sexual encounters when treated with tadalafil compared with sildenafil. These psychosocial outcomes may help explain why more men (71%) preferred tadalafil for the treatment of ED in this clinical trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16839321     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00261.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  11 in total

1.  Relationship between erectile function and sexual self-confidence: a path analytic model in men being treated with tadalafil.

Authors:  A Sontag; X Ni; S E Althof; R C Rosen
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  Psychosocial outcomes after initial treatment of erectile dysfunction with tadalafil once daily, tadalafil on demand or sildenafil citrate on demand: results from a randomized, open-label study.

Authors:  K Hatzimouratidis; J Buvat; H Büttner; P A S Vendeira; I Moncada; M Boehmer; C Henneges; F G Boess
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 3.  Management of erectile dysfunction in diabetes: an update for 2008.

Authors:  David Price; Geoffrey Hackett
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 4.  [Chronic PDE-5 inhibition in patients with erectile dysfunction: new treatment approach using once daily Tadalafil].

Authors:  H Porst; K Hell-Momeni; H Büttner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Risk factors for emotional and relationship problems in Peyronie's disease.

Authors:  James F Smith; Thomas J Walsh; Simon L Conti; Paul Turek; Tom Lue
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 6.  The role of the sexual partner in managing erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Hongjun Li; Tiejun Gao; Run Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Preference for and adherence to oral phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Konstantinos Giannitsas; Angelis Konstantinopoulos; Christos Patsialas; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Tadalafil once daily in the management of erectile dysfunction: patient and partner perspectives.

Authors:  Pierre Costa; Thierry Grivel; Naji Gehchan
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 9.  Toward a new 'EPOCH': optimising treatment outcomes with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  R Sadovsky; G B Brock; S W Gutkin; S Sorsaburu
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  An analysis of treatment preferences and sexual quality of life outcomes in female partners of Chinese men with erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Hong-Jun Li; Wen-Jun Bai; Yu-Tian Dai; Wen-Ping Xu; Chia-Ning Wang; Han-Zhong Li
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.