Literature DB >> 16839314

What can prevalence studies tell us about female sexual difficulty and dysfunction?

Richard D Hayes1, Catherine M Bennett2, Christopher K Fairley2, Lorraine Dennerstein3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Many recent studies have investigated the prevalence of female sexual difficulty/dysfunction. AIM: Investigate female sexual difficulty/dysfunction using data from prevalence studies.
METHODS: We reviewed published prevalence studies excluding those that had not included each category of sexual difficulty (desire, arousal, orgasm, and pain), were based on convenience sampling, or had a response rate <50% or a sample size <100. Main Outcome Measures. For each study we used the prevalence of any sexual difficulty as the denominator and calculated the proportion of women reporting each type of difficulty. For each category of sexual difficulty we used the prevalence of that difficulty lasting 1 month or more as the denominator and calculated the proportion of difficulties lasting several months or more and 6 months or more.
RESULTS: Only 11 of 1,248 studies identified met our inclusion criteria. These studies used different measures of sexual dysfunction, so generating a simple summary prevalence was not possible. However, we observed consistent patterns in the published data. Among women with any sexual difficulty, on average, 64% (range 16-75%) experienced desire difficulty, 35% (range 16- 48%) experienced orgasm difficulty, 31% (range 12-64%) experienced arousal difficulty, and 26% (range 7-58%) experienced sexual pain. Of the sexual difficulties that occurred for 1 month or more in the previous year, 62-89% persisted for at least several months and 25-28% persisted for 6 months or more. Two studies investigated distress. Only a proportion of women with sexual difficulty were distressed by it (21-67%).
CONCLUSIONS: Desire difficulty is the most common sexual difficulty experienced by women. While the majority of difficulties last for less than 6 months, up to a third persist for 6 months or more. Sexual difficulties do not always cause distress. Consequently, prevalence estimates will vary depending on the time frame specified by researchers and whether distress is included in these estimates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16839314     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00241.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  22 in total

1.  Applying the Female Sexual Functioning Index to sexual minority women.

Authors:  Ulrike Boehmer; Alison Timm; Al Ozonoff; Jennifer Potter
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 2.  Assessment & management of sexual problems in women.

Authors:  Kevan Wylie
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Sexism and anatomy, as discerned in textbooks and as perceived by medical students at Cardiff University and University of Paris Descartes.

Authors:  Susan Morgan; Odile Plaisant; Baptiste Lignier; Bernard J Moxham
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  The relationship between female sexual function index domains and premature ejaculation.

Authors:  Lütfi Canat; Recep Burak Değirmentepe; Hasan Anıl Atalay; İlter Alkan; Sait Özbir; Mehmet Gökhan Çulha; Alper Ötünçtemur
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder in Women: Physiology, Assessment, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Authors:  Jessica A Pettigrew; Andrew M Novick
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 6.  Evaluation and treatment of female sexual disorders.

Authors:  Sheryl Kingsberg; Stanley E Althof
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-05

7.  Is Female Wellness Affected When Men Blame Them for Erectile Dysfunction?

Authors:  Justin M Dubin; W Austin Wyant; Navin C Balaji; Iakov V Efimenko; Quinn C Rainer; Belen Mora; Lisa Paz; Ashley G Winter; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.491

8.  Female sexual dysfunction in patients with substance-related disorders.

Authors:  Alessandra Diehl; Rosiane Lopes da Silva; Ronaldo Laranjeira
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  The Natsal-SF: a validated measure of sexual function for use in community surveys.

Authors:  Kirstin R Mitchell; George B Ploubidis; Jessica Datta; Kaye Wellings
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Conceptualization and Inventory of the Sexual and Psychological Burden of Women With Pelvic Floor Complaints; A Mixed-Method Study.

Authors:  Alma M Brand; Scott Rosas; Wim Waterink; Slavi Stoyanov; Jacques J D M van Lankveld
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.523

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.