PURPOSE: To evaluate the bond strengths of six different luting cements to fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts after various pre-treatment procedures. METHODS: 180 FRC posts were divided into three groups (n=60) and received the following surface treatments. Group 1: untreated control; Group 2: silane treatment; Group 3: CoJet treatment. The posts of each group were fixed with six different luting cements. Push-out tests were performed to determine the bond strengths between the cements and the fiber posts. RESULTS: The observed bond strengths (MPa) of the different resin cements to the posts were significantly affected by the type of cement (P< 0.001), but not by the pre-treatment chosen (P> 0.05; 2-way-ANOVA). Without consideration of the pre-treatment procedures, Clearfil showed the highest bond strengths, followed by Panavia F and RelyX, whereas Multilink, Variolink and PermaFlo showed significantly lower bond strength values (P< 0.05; Tukey's B).
PURPOSE: To evaluate the bond strengths of six different luting cements to fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts after various pre-treatment procedures. METHODS: 180 FRC posts were divided into three groups (n=60) and received the following surface treatments. Group 1: untreated control; Group 2: silane treatment; Group 3: CoJet treatment. The posts of each group were fixed with six different luting cements. Push-out tests were performed to determine the bond strengths between the cements and the fiber posts. RESULTS: The observed bond strengths (MPa) of the different resin cements to the posts were significantly affected by the type of cement (P< 0.001), but not by the pre-treatment chosen (P> 0.05; 2-way-ANOVA). Without consideration of the pre-treatment procedures, Clearfil showed the highest bond strengths, followed by Panavia F and RelyX, whereas Multilink, Variolink and PermaFlo showed significantly lower bond strength values (P< 0.05; Tukey's B).