Literature DB >> 16838232

A comparison of the effectiveness of oseltamivir for the treatment of influenza A and influenza B: a Japanese multicenter study of the 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 influenza seasons.

Naoki Kawai1, Hideyuki Ikematsu, Norio Iwaki, Tetsunari Maeda, Ietaka Satoh, Nobuo Hirotsu, Seizaburo Kashiwagi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the effectiveness of oseltamivir for treatment of influenza A and influenza B, we conducted a prospective, multicenter study of the 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 influenza seasons. The study included 3351 patients in whom influenza had been diagnosed by use of an antigen detection test kit.
METHODS: Oseltamivir was administered to 1818 patients with influenza A and 1485 patients with influenza B. No anti-influenza drugs were administered to 21 patients with influenza A or to 27 patients with influenza B. Patients receiving oseltamivir therapy were divided into 4 groups according to the time between the onset of fever (temperature, > or = 37.5 degrees C) and administration of the first dose of oseltamivir (0-12 h, 13-24 h, 25-36 h, and 37-48 h). The patients were also divided into 4 subgroups on the basis of age (0-6 years, 7-15 years, 16-64 years, and >64 years). Virus isolation was performed after completion of oseltamivir therapy for 44 patients with influenza A and 31 patients with influenza B.
RESULTS: The duration of fever was significantly shorter for patients with influenza A and B who were treated with oseltamivir than for patients who were not treated with an anti-influenza drug (P<.001 for both). The time until the patient became afebrile after the initial administration of oseltamivir and the duration of fever were significantly longer for patients with influenza B than for patients with influenza A for the 0-12 h, 13-24 h, 25-36 h, and 37-48 h groups (P<.001) and for all age groups (P<.001). After 4-6 days of oseltamivir therapy, the influenza B virus reisolation rate (51.6%) was significantly higher than the influenza A virus reisolation rate (15.9%) (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Oseltamivir is less effective for influenza B than for influenza A with regard to duration of fever and virus persistence, irrespective of patient age or the timing of administration of the first dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16838232     DOI: 10.1086/505868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  44 in total

Review 1.  Antivirals for influenza: a summary of a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Nancy Santesso; Jonathan Hsu; Reem Mustafa; Jan Brozek; Yao Long Chen; Jessica P Hopkins; Adrienne Cheung; Gayane Hovhannisyan; Liudmila Ivanova; Signe A Flottorp; Ingvil Saeterdal; Arthur D Wong; Jinhui Tian; Timothy M Uyeki; Elie A Akl; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Fiona Smaill; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 2.  Neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza B virus infection: efficacy and resistance.

Authors:  Andrew J Burnham; Tatiana Baranovich; Elena A Govorkova
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 5.970

3.  Efficacy of single intravenous injection of peramivir against influenza B virus infection in ferrets and cynomolgus macaques.

Authors:  Mitsutaka Kitano; Yasushi Itoh; Makoto Kodama; Hirohito Ishigaki; Misako Nakayama; Hideaki Ishida; Kaoru Baba; Takahiro Noda; Kenji Sato; Yoichiro Nihashi; Takushi Kanazu; Ryu Yoshida; Ryuzo Torii; Akihiko Sato; Kazumasa Ogasawara
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Antivirals for treatment of influenza: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Jonathan Hsu; Nancy Santesso; Reem Mustafa; Jan Brozek; Yao Long Chen; Jessica P Hopkins; Adrienne Cheung; Gayane Hovhannisyan; Liudmila Ivanova; Signe A Flottorp; Ingvil Saeterdal; Arthur D Wong; Jinhui Tian; Timothy M Uyeki; Elie A Akl; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Fiona Smaill; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Optimizing T-705 (favipiravir) treatment of severe influenza B virus infection in the immunocompromised mouse model.

Authors:  Philippe Noriel Q Pascua; Bindumadhav M Marathe; Peter Vogel; Richard J Webby; Elena A Govorkova
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Chimeric Hemagglutinin Constructs Induce Broad Protection against Influenza B Virus Challenge in the Mouse Model.

Authors:  Megan E Ermler; Ericka Kirkpatrick; Weina Sun; Rong Hai; Fatima Amanat; Veronika Chromikova; Peter Palese; Florian Krammer
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Pyrazole compound BPR1P0034 with potent and selective anti-influenza virus activity.

Authors:  Shin-Ru Shih; Tzu-Yun Chu; Gadarla Randheer Reddy; Sung-Nain Tseng; Hsiun-Ling Chen; Wen-Fang Tang; Ming-sian Wu; Jiann-Yih Yeh; Yu-Sheng Chao; John Ta Hsu; Hsing-Pang Hsieh; Jim-Tong Horng
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 8.410

8.  The use of antiviral drugs for influenza: Guidance for practitioners 2012/2013.

Authors:  Fred Y Aoki; Upton D Allen; H Grant Stiver; Gerald A Evans
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.471

9.  Bioluminescence-based neuraminidase inhibition assay for monitoring influenza virus drug susceptibility in clinical specimens.

Authors:  Henju Marjuki; Vasiliy P Mishin; Katrina Sleeman; Margaret Okomo-Adhiambo; Tiffany G Sheu; Lizheng Guo; Xiyan Xu; Larisa V Gubareva
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Reducing the burden of influenza-associated complications with antiviral therapy.

Authors:  B R Ruf; T Szucs
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 3.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.