Literature DB >> 1683818

Bolus administration of esmolol for controlling the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation: the Canadian Multicentre Trial.

D R Miller1, R J Martineau, J E Wynands, J Hill.   

Abstract

A multicentre trial was designed to determine the dose-response and side-effects of esmolol when administered as a single iv bolus prior to induction of anaesthesia for controlling the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. Five hundred and forty-eight patients from 12 university-affiliated centres across Canada were randomized prospectively to receive either placebo (PLAC) or esmolol (E) in a dose of 100 mg (E100) or 200 mg (E200). Study medication was given immediately before induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone 3-5 mg.kg-1 and succinylcholine 1.5 mg.kg-1. Low-dose narcotic (fentanyl 2-3 micrograms.kg-1 or sufentanil 0.3 micrograms.kg-1) or moderate dose narcotic (fentanyl 4-7 micrograms.kg-1) was also given at five of the participating centres, whereas patients in the remaining seven centres received no narcotic. Patients who received PLAC and no narcotic had greater HR and SBP values after tracheal intubation than patients who received either E100 or E200 (P less than 0.005). The proportion of patients whose maximum HR exceeded 110 min-1 was also greater in the PLAC group (22/180) than in either the E100 (10/187) or E200 (9/181) groups (P less than 0.05), but was not different when comparing E100 with E200. Esmolol was less effective in controlling blood pressure, but, in combination with low-dose narcotic, esmolol suppressed the SBP response to tracheal intubation. In the presence of moderate-dose narcotic, however, a decrease in SBP occurred in all three groups following induction of anaesthesia (P less than 0.003), with the largest decrease (17 +/- 4%) occurring in patients who had received E200. The overall incidence of hypotension (SBP less than 90 mmHg) was greater in the E200 group (33%) than either the E100 (25%) or PLAC (16%) groups (P less than 0.05). Other side-effects, such as bradycardia, bronchospasm or pain on injection, occurred no more frequently in either esmolol group than with placebo. It is concluded that a 100 mg bolus of esmolol is safe and effective for controlling the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. This dose of esmolol combined with a low dose of narcotic (fentanyl 2-3 micrograms.kg-1 or equivalent) results in effective control of both heart rate and blood pressure, while avoiding important side-effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1683818     DOI: 10.1007/BF03036959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  21 in total

1.  Bolus dose esmolol for anesthesia: is there a need?

Authors:  J B Leslie
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.452

2.  Bolus doses of esmolol for the prevention of perioperative hypertension and tachycardia.

Authors:  D Oxorn; J W Knox; J Hill
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 3.  Controlled beta-receptor blockade with esmolol and flestolol.

Authors:  V S Murthy; W H Frishman
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacology of the new beta-adrenergic blocking drugs. Part 3. Comparative clinical experience and new therapeutic applications.

Authors:  W Frishman; R Silverman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Esmolol attenuates hemodynamic responses during fentanyl-pancuronium anesthesia for aortocoronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  L R Newsome; J V Roth; C C Hug; D Nagle
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Cardiovascular effects of esmolol in anesthetized humans.

Authors:  P G Menkhaus; J G Reves; I Kissin; J M Alvis; A V Govier; P N Samuelson; W A Lell; C E Henling; E Bradley
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  A single bolus dose of esmolol in the prevention of intubation-induced tachycardia and hypertension in an ambulatory surgery unit.

Authors:  S M Parnass; D M Rothenberg; J P Kerchberger; A D Ivankovich
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.452

8.  Treatment of stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation with fentanyl.

Authors:  N Dahlgren; K Messeter
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of esmolol administered as an intravenous bolus.

Authors:  A L Sintetos; J Hulse; E L Pritchett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Cardiovascular and neuromuscular effects of esmolol during induction of anesthesia.

Authors:  V S Murthy; K D Patel; R G Elangovan; T F Hwang; S M Solochek; J D Steck; A R Laddu
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.126

View more
  23 in total

1.  Esmolol--just another beta blocker?

Authors:  R I Hall
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 2.  [Perioperative beta-receptor blockade. For and against].

Authors:  B Preckel; M Poels; F Wappler; W Schlack; W Buhre
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  How strong is the evidence for the use of perioperative beta blockers in non-cardiac surgery? Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  P J Devereaux; W Scott Beattie; Peter T-L Choi; Neal H Badner; Gordon H Guyatt; Juan C Villar; Claudio S Cinà; Kate Leslie; Michael J Jacka; Victor M Montori; Mohit Bhandari; Alvaro Avezum; Alexandre B Cavalcanti; Julian W Giles; Thomas Schricker; Homer Yang; Carl-Johan Jakobsen; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-04

4.  Perioperative beta-blockers for preventing surgery-related mortality and morbidity in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Hermann Blessberger; Sharon R Lewis; Michael W Pritchard; Lizzy J Fawcett; Hans Domanovits; Oliver Schlager; Brigitte Wildner; Juergen Kammler; Clemens Steinwender
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-26

5.  EFFICACY OF INTRAVENOUS ESMOLOL VERSUS LIDOCAINE FOR ATTENUATION OF THE PRESSOR RESPONSE IN NIGERIANS.

Authors:  J O Olatosi; A Ehiozie-Osifo
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

6.  Bolus application of landiolol and esmolol: comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles in a healthy Caucasian group.

Authors:  Günther Krumpl; Ivan Ulc; Michaela Trebs; Pavla Kadlecová; Juri Hodisch
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Answering letter to remark of Dr's Frank and Fitzgerald.

Authors:  Günther Krumpl
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Oral Clonidine vs Oral Pregabalin Premedication to Attenuate Pressor Response to Direct Laryngoscopy in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Double Blind Study.

Authors:  Shirin Parveen; Devendra Singh Negi; Rajesh Kumar; Mohd Chand Bagwan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-09-01

Review 9.  Esmolol. A review of its therapeutic efficacy and pharmacokinetic characteristics.

Authors:  D Wiest
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Esmolol blunts the haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation in treated hypertensive patients.

Authors:  S Sharma; S Mitra; V K Grover; R Kalra
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.