Literature DB >> 16837591

Influence of response variability on the coding performance of central gustatory neurons.

Christian H Lemon1, David V Smith.   

Abstract

We explored how variability in responding to taste stimuli could impact the signaling of taste quality information by neuron types and individual cells in the nucleus of the solitary tract. One hundred sixty-two neurons recorded from anesthetized rats were grouped using multivariate analysis of taste responses to the following (in m): 0.5 sucrose, 0.1 NaCl, 0.01 HCl, and 0.01 quinine-HCl. Neurons fell into one of three groups corresponding to cell types that responded optimally to sucrose, NaCl, or HCl. A statistical model was used to examine whether responses observed among neurons within each group could be correctly attributed to the optimal stimulus or another tastant on the basis of spike count. Results revealed poor classification performance in some cases attributable to wide variations in the sensitivities of neurons that compose a cell type. This outcome leads us to question whether neuron types could faithfully encode a single taste quality. We then theoretically explored whether a hypothetical observer of individual neurons could discriminate between spiking rates to different tastants during the first second of stimulus processing. Spike rate was found to be an unreliable predictor of stimulus quality for each neuron tested. However, additional analyses suggested that taste stimuli could be identified by a reader that attends to the relative spiking activities of different kinds of neurons in parallel. Rather than assigning meaning to individual neurons or categories of them, central gustatory circuits may signal quality information using a strategy that involves the relative activities of neurons with different sensitivities to tastants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16837591      PMCID: PMC6674201          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0106-06.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  9 in total

1.  Taste-evoked responses to sweeteners in the nucleus of the solitary tract differ between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Stuart A McCaughey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Interaural level difference discrimination thresholds for single neurons in the lateral superior olive.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Kanthaiah Koka; Jeffrey J Tsai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Local field potentials in the gustatory cortex carry taste information.

Authors:  Rodrigo Pavão; Caitlin E Piette; Vítor Lopes-dos-Santos; Donald B Katz; Adriano B L Tort
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Single and population coding of taste in the gustatory cortex of awake mice.

Authors:  David Levitan; Jian-You Lin; Joseph Wachutka; Narendra Mukherjee; Sacha B Nelson; Donald B Katz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Bursting by taste-responsive cells in the rodent brain stem.

Authors:  John-Paul Baird; Michael G Tordoff; Stuart A McCaughey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Quality time: representation of a multidimensional sensory domain through temporal coding.

Authors:  Patricia M Di Lorenzo; Jen-Yung Chen; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  The taste of sugars.

Authors:  Stuart A McCaughey
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Statistical analysis and decoding of neural activity in the rodent geniculate ganglion using a metric-based inference system.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Thomas G Mast; Christopher Ziembko; Joseph M Breza; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The neural processing of taste.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon; Donald B Katz
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.288

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.