PURPOSE: Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH-5) is a major lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme catalyzing the transformation of pyruvate to lactate for anaerobic acquisition energy. In this study, the expression of LDH-5 was assessed in the normal and malignant endometrium. Its role in prognosis and tumor angiogenesis and hypoxia was also examined. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Tissue specimens from 68 patients with clinical stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma of the endometrioid cell type and 20 samples from normally cycling endometrium were investigated immunohistochemically for the expression of LDH-5. The vascular density and the expression of angiogenesis/hypoxia-related proteins (VEGF, HIF1alpha, HIF2alpha, phosphorylated VEGFR2/KDR, VEGF/KDR complex) were also assessed. RESULTS: Unlike other normal epithelia, the glandular endometrial cells consistently expressed LDH-5 suggesting a role of this enzyme in the normal menstrual cycle. Endometrial adenocarcinomas displayed LDH-5 expression in 31/68 (45.5%) cases with those having a high LDH-5 expression being connected with a low lymphocytic response; this may suggest an important role of LDH-5 and, presumably, lactate release in tumor escape from host immuno-surveillance. More importantly, LDH-5 was significantly associated with the expression of phosphorylated VEGFR2/KDR receptors in cancer cells and tumor-associated vasculature. LDH-5 was one of the most powerful and independent prognostic variables. CONCLUSIONS: LDH-5 expression is an independent prognostic marker in endometrial cancer, linked with impaired host immune response and activation of VEGFR2/KDR receptors in both cancer cells and tumor-associated vasculature. Adjuvant radio-chemotherapy may, therefore, be useful in these cases, while the administration of VEGF- tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitors emerges as a therapeutic option.
PURPOSE:Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH-5) is a major lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme catalyzing the transformation of pyruvate to lactate for anaerobic acquisition energy. In this study, the expression of LDH-5 was assessed in the normal and malignant endometrium. Its role in prognosis and tumor angiogenesis and hypoxia was also examined. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Tissue specimens from 68 patients with clinical stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma of the endometrioid cell type and 20 samples from normally cycling endometrium were investigated immunohistochemically for the expression of LDH-5. The vascular density and the expression of angiogenesis/hypoxia-related proteins (VEGF, HIF1alpha, HIF2alpha, phosphorylated VEGFR2/KDR, VEGF/KDR complex) were also assessed. RESULTS: Unlike other normal epithelia, the glandular endometrial cells consistently expressed LDH-5 suggesting a role of this enzyme in the normal menstrual cycle. Endometrial adenocarcinomas displayed LDH-5 expression in 31/68 (45.5%) cases with those having a high LDH-5 expression being connected with a low lymphocytic response; this may suggest an important role of LDH-5 and, presumably, lactate release in tumor escape from host immuno-surveillance. More importantly, LDH-5 was significantly associated with the expression of phosphorylated VEGFR2/KDR receptors in cancer cells and tumor-associated vasculature. LDH-5 was one of the most powerful and independent prognostic variables. CONCLUSIONS: LDH-5 expression is an independent prognostic marker in endometrial cancer, linked with impaired host immune response and activation of VEGFR2/KDR receptors in both cancer cells and tumor-associated vasculature. Adjuvant radio-chemotherapy may, therefore, be useful in these cases, while the administration of VEGF- tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitors emerges as a therapeutic option.
Authors: Ganesha Rai; Kyle R Brimacombe; Bryan T Mott; Daniel J Urban; Xin Hu; Shyh-Ming Yang; Tobie D Lee; Dorian M Cheff; Jennifer Kouznetsova; Gloria A Benavides; Katie Pohida; Eric J Kuenstner; Diane K Luci; Christine M Lukacs; Douglas R Davies; David M Dranow; Hu Zhu; Gary Sulikowski; William J Moore; Gordon M Stott; Andrew J Flint; Matthew D Hall; Victor M Darley-Usmar; Leonard M Neckers; Chi V Dang; Alex G Waterson; Anton Simeonov; Ajit Jadhav; David J Maloney Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Jianjun Han; Lu Zhang; Hui Guo; Weiya Z Wysham; Dario R Roque; Adam K Willson; Xiugui Sheng; Chunxiao Zhou; Victoria L Bae-Jump Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-06-30 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: G Larry Maxwell; Brian L Hood; Roger Day; Uma Chandran; David Kirchner; V S Kumar Kolli; Nicolas W Bateman; Jay Allard; Caela Miller; Mai Sun; Melanie S Flint; Chris Zahn; Julie Oliver; Subhadra Banerjee; Tracy Litzi; Anil Parwani; Glenn Sandburg; Scott Rose; Michael J Becich; Andrew Berchuck; Elise Kohn; John I Risinger; Thomas P Conrads Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Courtney A Crane; Kathryn Austgen; Kristen Haberthur; Carly Hofmann; Kara White Moyes; Lia Avanesyan; Lawrence Fong; Michael J Campbell; Stewart Cooper; Scott A Oakes; Andrew T Parsa; Lewis L Lanier Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-08-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jihan Harki; Aria Sana; Désirée van Noord; Paul J van Diest; Petra van der Groep; Ernst J Kuipers; Leon M G Moons; Katharina Biermann; Eric T T L Tjwa Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 4.064