Literature DB >> 16836176

Maxillary sinus augmentation using an engineered porous hydroxyapatite: a clinical, histological, and transmission electron microscopy study in man.

Carlo Mangano1, Antonio Scarano, Giovanna Iezzi, Giovanna Orsini, Vittoria Perrotti, Francesco Mangano, Sergio Montini, Marcello Piccirilli, Adriano Piattelli.   

Abstract

Porous hydroxyapatite (HA) is a calcium-phosphate-based material that is biocompatible, nonimmunological, and osteoconductive, and has a macroporosity of about 200 to 800 microm. The pores seem to be able to induce migration, adhesion, and proliferation of osteoblasts inside the pore network and to promote angiogenesis inside the pore system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical behavior and the histological and ultrastructural aspects of porous HA in maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. Twenty-four patients (19 men, 5 women; average age 53.4 years) in good general physical and mental health and with partially or completely edentulous maxillae were selected for this study. Six months after sinus floor elevation, at the time of dental implant placement, biopsies were carried out under local anesthesia. These bone cores were cut in half and were processed for light and transmission electron microscopy. After a mean 3 years after implantation, all implants are clinically in function and no surgical or prosthetic complications have occurred. Under light microscopy, newly formed bone was 38.5% +/- 4.5%, whereas the residual biomaterial represented 12% +/- 2.3% and the marrow spaces represented 44.6% +/- 4.2%. In addition, in the majority of cases, the biomaterial particles were in close contact with the bone, which appeared compact with the characteristic features of well-organized lamellar bone. A cement-like line was slightly visible at the bone-biomaterial interface, but there were no gaps or interposed connective tissue in between. A high quantity (about 40%) of newly formed bone was present. Bone was closely apposed to the biomaterials particles as shown in light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. Moreover, no signs of inflammatory cell infiltrate or foreign body reaction were present. Also, most of the biomaterial was resorbed and only a small quantity (a little more than 10%) was still present. The results of our study show that porous HA can be a suitable synthetic material for bone regeneration in maxillary sinus augmentation procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16836176     DOI: 10.1563/796.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  12 in total

1.  Hydroxyapatite/gelatin/gellan sponges as nanocomposite scaffolds for bone reconstruction.

Authors:  Niccoletta Barbani; Giulio D Guerra; Caterina Cristallini; Patrizia Urciuoli; Riccardo Avvisati; Alessandro Sala; Elisabetta Rosellini
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles as Injectable Bone Substitute Material in a Vertical Bone Augmentation Model.

Authors:  Aoi Kaneko; Eriko Marukawa; Hiroyuki Harada
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite as bone filler in an ameloblastoma mandibular defect.

Authors:  Roberto Grigolato; Natalia Pizzi; Maria C Brotto; Giovanni Corrocher; Giovanna Desando; Brunella Grigolo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

Review 4.  Histological and Biological Response to Different Types of Biomaterials: A Narrative Single Research Center Experience over Three Decades.

Authors:  Margherita Tumedei; Eitan Mijiritsky; Carlos Fernando Mourão; Adriano Piattelli; Marco Degidi; Carlo Mangano; Giovanna Iezzi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Performance of coralline hydroxyapatite in sinus floor augmentation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhi-Bin Luo; Qing-Bin Zhang; Zhao-Qiang Zhang; Dan Chen; Wang-Xiang Yan; Ke-Feng Li; Yu Chen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Mesenchymal stem cells in maxillary sinus augmentation: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francesco G Mangano; Marco Colombo; Giovanni Veronesi; Alberto Caprioglio; Carlo Mangano
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  Maxillary sinus augmentation procedures through equine-derived biomaterial or calvaria autologous bone: immunohistochemical evaluation of OPG/RANKL in humans.

Authors:  S Tetè; R Vinci; V L Zizzari; S Zara; V La Scala; A Cataldi; E Gherlone; A Piattelli
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.188

8.  Human dental pulp stem cells hook into biocoral scaffold forming an engineered biocomplex.

Authors:  Carlo Mangano; Francesca Paino; Riccardo d'Aquino; Alfredo De Rosa; Giovanna Iezzi; Adriano Piattelli; Luigi Laino; Thimios Mitsiadis; Vincenzo Desiderio; Francesco Mangano; Gianpaolo Papaccio; Virginia Tirino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The effect of immobilization of heparin and bone morphogenic protein-2 to bovine bone substitute on osteoblast-like cell's function.

Authors:  Jung-Bo Huh; Sung-Eun Kim; Se-Kyung Song; Mi-Jung Yun; Ji-Suk Shim; Jeong-Yol Lee; Sang-Wan Shin
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  Histological and micro-computed tomographic observations after maxillary sinus augmentation with porous hydroxyapatite alloplasts: a clinical case series.

Authors:  Hidemi Nakata; Shinji Kuroda; Noriko Tachikawa; Emi Okada; Maho Akatsuka; Shohei Kasugai; Hisatomo Kondo
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.