Literature DB >> 16836055

The development of sensitivity to biological motion in noise.

Alejo Freire1, Terri L Lewis, Daphne Maurer, Randolph Blake.   

Abstract

We investigated developmental changes in sensitivity to biological motion by asking 6-year-olds, 9-year-olds, and adults (twenty-four in each group) to discriminate point-light biological motion displays depicting one of a variety of human movements from scrambled versions of the same displays. When tested without noise dots, participants at all ages performed near ceiling levels and no differences in accuracy were found among the three age groups. Age differences emerged in the second task, in which we used a staircase procedure to determine threshold values of the number of noise dots that could be tolerated in producing a percentage correct value corresponding to a d' value of 1.4. Sensitivity to biological motion improved linearly with age (p < 0.01), with 6-year-olds performing significantly more poorly than adults. This immature performance contrasts with adult-like accuracy by 4 years of age for sensitivity to global motion (Parrish et al, 2005 Vision Research 45 827-837). The comparison implies an immaturity at 6 years of age in the neural networks involved specifically in the processing of biological motion, networks that may include the superior temporal sulcus (STS).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16836055     DOI: 10.1068/p5403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  14 in total

1.  Microstructural development: organizational differences of the fiber architecture between children and adults in dorsal and ventral visual streams.

Authors:  Thomas Loenneker; Peter Klaver; Kerstin Bucher; Janine Lichtensteiger; Adrian Imfeld; Ernst Martin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Neural correlates of coherent and biological motion perception in autism.

Authors:  Kami Koldewyn; David Whitney; Susan M Rivera
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-06-18

3.  Thin-slice perception develops slowly.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Nancy Kanwisher; Rebecca Saxe
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2012-03-13

4.  Action perception is intact in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  James P Cusack; Justin H G Williams; Peter Neri
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Sensitive perception of a person's direction of walking by 4-year-old children.

Authors:  Timothy D Sweeny; Nicole Wurnitsch; Alison Gopnik; David Whitney
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2013-01-28

Review 6.  The visual perception of motion by observers with autism spectrum disorders: a review and synthesis.

Authors:  Martha D Kaiser; Maggie Shiffrar
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

7.  Developmental changes in emotion recognition from full-light and point-light displays of body movement.

Authors:  Patrick D Ross; Louise Polson; Marie-Hélène Grosbras
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Deficient biological motion perception in schizophrenia: results from a motion noise paradigm.

Authors:  Jejoong Kim; Daniel Norton; Ryan McBain; Dost Ongur; Yue Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-04

Review 9.  Motion perception: a review of developmental changes and the role of early visual experience.

Authors:  Batsheva Hadad; Sivan Schwartz; Daphne Maurer; Terri L Lewis
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-15

10.  Individual differences in the perception of biological motion and fragmented figures are not correlated.

Authors:  Eunice L Jung; Asieh Zadbood; Sang-Hun Lee; Andrew J Tomarken; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.