Literature DB >> 16835696

Enrichment of integral membrane proteins from small amounts of brain tissue.

J Schindler1, S Jung, G Niedner-Schatteburg, E Friauf, H G Nothwang.   

Abstract

Subcellular fractionation represents an essential technique for functional proteome analysis. Recently, we provided a subcellular fractionation protocol for minute amounts of tissue that yielded a nuclear fraction, a membrane and organelle fraction, and a cytosolic fraction. In the current study, we attempted to improve the protocol for the isolation of integral membrane proteins, as these are particularly important for brain function. In the membrane and organelle fraction, we increased the yield of membranes and organelles by about 50% by introducing a single re-extraction step. We then tested two protocols towards their capacity to enrich membrane proteins present in the membrane and organelle fraction. One protocol is based on sequential solubilization using subsequent increases of chaotropic conditions such as urea, thereby partitioning hydrophobic proteins from hydrophilic ones. The alternative protocol applies high-salt and high-pH washes to remove non-membrane proteins. The enrichment of membrane proteins by these procedures, as compared to the original membrane and organelle fraction, was evaluated by 16-BAC-SDS-PAGE followed by mass spectrometry of randomly selected spots. In the original membrane and organelle fraction, 7 of 50 (14%) identified proteins represented integral membrane proteins, and 15 (30%) were peripheral membrane proteins. In the urea-soluble fraction, 4 of 33 (12%) identified proteins represented integral membrane proteins, and 10 (30%) were peripheral membrane proteins. In the high-salt/high-pH resistant sediment, 12 of 45 (27%) identified proteins were integral membrane proteins and 13 (29%) represented peripheral membrane proteins. During the analysis, several proteins involved in neuroexocytosis were detected, including syntaxin, NSF, and Rab3-interaction protein 2. Taken together, differential centrifugation in combination with high-salt and high-pH washes resulted in the highest enrichment of integral membrane proteins and, therefore, represents an adequate technique for region-specific profiling of membrane proteins in the brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16835696     DOI: 10.1007/s00702-006-0508-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)        ISSN: 0300-9564            Impact factor:   3.575


  27 in total

Review 1.  Cell biology of the presynaptic terminal.

Authors:  Venkatesh N Murthy; Pietro De Camilli
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  An optimized method for the isolation and identification of membrane proteins.

Authors:  Ines Lehner; Monika Niehof; Jürgen Borlak
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 3.  Proteomics: advanced technology for the analysis of cellular function.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Takahashi; Hiroyuki Kaji; Mitsuaki Yanagida; Toshiya Hayano; Toshiaki Isobe
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  A method for the comprehensive proteomic analysis of membrane proteins.

Authors:  Christine C Wu; Michael J MacCoss; Kathryn E Howell; John R Yates
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Convenient and versatile subcellular extraction procedure, that facilitates classical protein expression profiling and functional protein analysis.

Authors:  Afsaneh Abdolzade-Bavil; Scott Hayes; Lothar Goretzki; Michaela Kröger; Jonas Anders; Robertus Hendriks
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 6.  Zooming in: fractionation strategies in proteomics.

Authors:  Taras Stasyk; Lukas A Huber
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 7.  Computational analysis of membrane proteins: genomic occurrence, structure prediction and helix interactions.

Authors:  Ursula Lehnert; Yu Xia; Thomas E Royce; Chem-Sing Goh; Yang Liu; Alessandro Senes; Haiyuan Yu; Zhao Lei Zhang; Donald M Engelman; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.318

Review 8.  Neurotransmitter release - four years of SNARE complexes.

Authors:  P I Hanson; J E Heuser; R Jahn
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Extraction of membrane proteins by differential solubilization for separation using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  M P Molloy; B R Herbert; B J Walsh; M I Tyler; M Traini; J C Sanchez; D F Hochstrasser; K L Williams; A A Gooley
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.535

10.  Isolation of intracellular membranes by means of sodium carbonate treatment: application to endoplasmic reticulum.

Authors:  Y Fujiki; A L Hubbard; S Fowler; P B Lazarow
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  10 in total

1.  Connexin and AMPA receptor expression changes over time in the rat olfactory bulb.

Authors:  J T Corthell; D A Fadool; P Q Trombley
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Fibrin deposited in the Alzheimer's disease brain promotes neuronal degeneration.

Authors:  Marta Cortes-Canteli; Larissa Mattei; Allison T Richards; Erin H Norris; Sidney Strickland
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  Melatonin in the mammalian olfactory bulb.

Authors:  J T Corthell; J Olcese; P Q Trombley
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Enhancing identifications of lipid-embedded proteins by mass spectrometry for improved mapping of endothelial plasma membranes in vivo.

Authors:  Yan Li; Jingyi Yu; Yipeng Wang; Noelle M Griffin; Fred Long; Sabrina Shore; Phil Oh; Jan E Schnitzer
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Accumulation of oligomer-prone α-synuclein exacerbates synaptic and neuronal degeneration in vivo.

Authors:  Edward Rockenstein; Silke Nuber; Cassia R Overk; Kiren Ubhi; Michael Mante; Christina Patrick; Anthony Adame; Margarita Trejo-Morales; Juan Gerez; Paola Picotti; Poul H Jensen; Silvia Campioni; Roland Riek; Jürgen Winkler; Fred H Gage; Beate Winner; Eliezer Masliah
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 6.  Coupling enrichment methods with proteomics for understanding and treating disease.

Authors:  Amit Kumar; Deniz Baycin-Hizal; Joseph Shiloach; Michael A Bowen; Michael J Betenbaugh
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  The cell surface proteome of human mesenchymal stromal cells.

Authors:  Christian Niehage; Charlotte Steenblock; Theresia Pursche; Martin Bornhäuser; Denis Corbeil; Bernard Hoflack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The molecular assembly of amyloid aβ controls its neurotoxicity and binding to cellular proteins.

Authors:  Claudia Manzoni; Laura Colombo; Paolo Bigini; Valentina Diana; Alfredo Cagnotto; Massimo Messa; Monica Lupi; Valentina Bonetto; Mauro Pignataro; Cristina Airoldi; Erika Sironi; Alun Williams; Mario Salmona
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Neurological effects of inorganic arsenic exposure: altered cysteine/glutamate transport, NMDA expression and spatial memory impairment.

Authors:  Lucio A Ramos-Chávez; Christian R R Rendón-López; Angélica Zepeda; Daniela Silva-Adaya; Luz M Del Razo; María E Gonsebatt
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 5.505

10.  Early Neurotoxic Effects of Inorganic Arsenic Modulate Cortical GSH Levels Associated With the Activation of the Nrf2 and NFκB Pathways, Expression of Amino Acid Transporters and NMDA Receptors and the Production of Hydrogen Sulfide.

Authors:  Daniela Silva-Adaya; Lucio Antonio Ramos-Chávez; Pavel Petrosyan; Wendy Leslie González-Alfonso; Alegna Pérez-Acosta; Maria E Gonsebatt
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 5.505

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.