Literature DB >> 16835322

Human papillomavirus type-specific 18-month risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with a normal or borderline/mildly dyskaryotic smear.

Johannes Berkhof1, Nicole W J Bulkmans, Maaike C G Bleeker, Saskia Bulk, Peter J F Snijders, Feja J Voorhorst, Chris J L M Meijer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) DNA testing is an increasingly used instrument in cervical cancer prevention along cervical cytology. The inclusion of hrHPV testing in cervical screening requires efficient management as many hrHPV infections are transient. We investigated the potential value of hrHPV genotyping in normal and borderline/mildly dyskaryotic (BMD) smears.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From a screening population of 44,102 women in the Netherlands, we included hrHPV-positive women with a normal or BMD smear. We assessed the type-specific 18-month risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).
RESULTS: In hrHPV-positive women, 18-month risk of CIN grade 3 or invasive cancer (> or =CIN3) was 6% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 4-9] after normal cytology and 20% (95% CI, 16-25) after BMD. If positive for HPV16, > or =CIN3 risks were 14% (95% CI, 9-21) and 37% (95% CI, 28-48), respectively. In the subset of hrHPV-positive women without HPV16, HPV18 was associated with an increased risk of high-grade CIN after normal cytology and HPV31 and HPV33 were associated with an increased risk, particularly after BMD. HPV16 and HPV18 were also associated with an increased risk of high-grade CIN in women with an hrHPV-positive normal baseline smear and a repeat normal smear at 6 months. DISCUSSION: HrHPV-positive women without type 16, 18, 31, or 33 had a relatively low risk of high-grade CIN. Among women with baseline normal cytology and among women with a baseline and repeat normal smear, HPV16/18-positive women showed an increased risk of high-grade CIN. This warrants more aggressive management of HPV16/18-positive women compared with other hrHPV-positive women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16835322     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  24 in total

1.  Cross-sectional comparison of an automated hybrid capture 2 assay and the consensus GP5+/6+ PCR method in a population-based cervical screening program.

Authors:  A T Hesselink; N W J Bulkmans; J Berkhof; A T Lorincz; C J L M Meijer; P J F Snijders
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Differential in vitro immortalization capacity of eleven (probable) [corrected] high-risk human papillomavirus types.

Authors:  Denise M Schütze; Peter J F Snijders; Leontien Bosch; Duco Kramer; Chris J L M Meijer; Renske D M Steenbergen
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Comparison of the clinical performance of PapilloCheck human papillomavirus detection with that of the GP5+/6+-PCR-enzyme immunoassay in population-based cervical screening.

Authors:  A T Hesselink; D A M Heideman; J Berkhof; F Topal; R P Pol; C J L M Meijer; P J F Snijders
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Validation of a low-cost human papillomavirus genotyping assay based on PGMY PCR and reverse blotting hybridization with reusable membranes.

Authors:  C Estrade; P-A Menoud; D Nardelli-Haefliger; R Sahli
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of Seegene Anyplex II HPV28 with the PGMY-CHUV assay for human papillomavirus genotyping.

Authors:  C Estrade; R Sahli
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  A pilot analytic study of a research-level, lower-cost human papillomavirus 16, 18, and 45 test.

Authors:  Hannah P Yang; David K Walmer; Delson Merisier; Julia C Gage; Laura Bell; Sameera Rangwala; Niwashin Shrestha; Lori Kobayashi; Paul S Eder; Philip E Castle
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.014

7.  Clinical validation of the HPV-risk assay, a novel real-time PCR assay for detection of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA by targeting the E7 region.

Authors:  A T Hesselink; J Berkhof; M L van der Salm; A P van Splunter; T H Geelen; F J van Kemenade; M G B Bleeker; D A M Heideman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of linear array and line blot assay for detection of human papillomavirus and diagnosis of cervical precancer and cancer in the atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage study.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Patti E Gravitt; Diane Solomon; Cosette M Wheeler; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  HPV-based Tests for Cervical Cancer Screening and Management of Cervical Disease.

Authors:  Patricia Luhn; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep       Date:  2013-06-01

10.  Comparison of GP5+/6+-PCR and SPF10-line blot assays for detection of high-risk human papillomavirus in samples from women with normal cytology results who develop grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  A T Hesselink; M A P C van Ham; D A M Heideman; Z M A Groothuismink; L Rozendaal; J Berkhof; F J van Kemenade; L A F G Massuger; W J G Melchers; C J L M Meijer; P J F Snijders
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.