Persistent organic pollutants are environmental contaminants that, because of their lipophilic properties and long half-lives, bioaccumulate within aquatic food webs and often reach high concentrations in marine mammals, such as harbor seals (Phoca vitulina). Exposure to these contaminants has been associated with developmental abnormalities, immunotoxicity, and reproductive impairment in marine mammals and other high-trophic-level wildlife, mediated via a disruption of endocrine processes. The highly conserved thyroid hormones (THs) represent one vulnerable endocrine end point that is critical for metabolism, growth, and development in vertebrates. We characterized the relationship between contaminants and specific TH receptor (TR) gene expression in skin/blubber biopsy samples, as well as serum THs, from free-ranging harbor seal pups (n = 39) in British Columbia, Canada, and Washington State, USA. We observed a contaminant-related increase in blubber TR-alpha gene expression [total polychlorinated biphenyls (capital sigmaPCBs); r = 0.679; p < 0.001] and a concomitant decrease in circulating total thyroxine concentrations (capital sigmaPCBs; r = -0.711; p < 0.001) . Consistent with results observed in carefully controlled laboratory and captive feeding studies, our findings suggest that the TH system in harbor seals is highly sensitive to disruption by environmental contaminants. Such a disruption not only may lead to adverse effects on growth and development but also could have important ramifications for lipid metabolism and energetics in marine mammals.
Persistent organic pollutants are environmental contaminants that, because of their lipophilic properties and long half-lives, bioaccumulate within aquatic food webs and often reach high concentrations in marine mammals, such as harbor seals (Phoca vitulina). Exposure to these contaminants has been associated with developmental abnormalities, immunotoxicity, and reproductive impairment in marine mammals and other high-trophic-level wildlife, mediated via a disruption of endocrine processes. The highly conserved thyroid hormones (THs) represent one vulnerable endocrine end point that is critical for metabolism, growth, and development in vertebrates. We characterized the relationship between contaminants and specific TH receptor (TR) gene expression in skin/blubber biopsy samples, as well as serum THs, from free-ranging harbor seal pups (n = 39) in British Columbia, Canada, and Washington State, USA. We observed a contaminant-related increase in blubber TR-alpha gene expression [total polychlorinated biphenyls (capital sigmaPCBs); r = 0.679; p < 0.001] and a concomitant decrease in circulating total thyroxine concentrations (capital sigmaPCBs; r = -0.711; p < 0.001) . Consistent with results observed in carefully controlled laboratory and captive feeding studies, our findings suggest that the TH system in harbor seals is highly sensitive to disruption by environmental contaminants. Such a disruption not only may lead to adverse effects on growth and development but also could have important ramifications for lipid metabolism and energetics in marine mammals.
A wide range of chemicals produced either directly or indirectly as a result
of human activities have contributed to the contamination of aquatic
food chains around the world. Marine mammals occupying high trophic
levels in aquatic food webs are often contaminated with relatively
high concentrations of persistent organic pollutants (POPs), including
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), and polybrominated
diphenylethers (PBDEs). This is because of food-web–related
biomagnification, the extent of which reflects the persistence of the
chemical coupled with the long lifespan and limited detoxification
capacity of marine mammals (Ross et al. 2000; Tanabe et al. 1988). Many studies have shown that exposure to these complex mixtures of POPs
can lead to developmental abnormalities, reproductive impairment, endocrine
disruption, and immunosuppression in harbor seals (Brouwer et al. 1989; De Swart et al. 1994; Reijnders 1986) and other marine mammals (Skaare et al. 2001; Sonne et al. 2004). Marine mammals may therefore serve as indicators of marine environmental
contamination, something that is relevant to both human and ecologic
risk assessments (Ross 2000).Harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) are non-migratory (adult home range of ~ 50 km2) and abundant around the coast of British Columbia, Canada, and Washington
State, USA (Cottrell et al. 2002). The biology and physiology of this pinniped have been well documented, reflecting
its wide distribution in temperate waters around the world
and its relative ease of study. In British Columbia and Washington
State, the harbor seal has been used to identify regional POP hotspots (Ross et al. 2004) and as a model marine mammal species for evaluating the relationship
between contaminants and health effects (Levin et al. 2005; Simms et al. 2000).Although the concept of endocrine disruption in wildlife has garnered much
international scientific attention (Colborn et al. 1997), contaminant-related alteration of thyroid hormones (THs) and related
processes may adversely affect vertebrates. The THs thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3) play a crucial role in developmental processes and in the regulation
of metabolism in adults. THs are produced in the thyroid gland, mainly
in the form of T4, and are subsequently converted to the more bioactive T3 form in peripheral (target) tissues through the action of deiodinases. Laboratory-based
studies have indicated that some POPs and their metabolites
interfere with TH physiology at multiple levels, including hormone
synthesis, circulatory transport of TH, and TH metabolism in the
liver and brain (Brouwer et al. 1998; Legler and Brouwer 2003). Reductions in circulating TH levels have been observed with increasing
exposure to PCBs and related compounds in laboratory animals, aquatic
birds, and both captive and free-ranging marine mammals, highlighting
the sensitivity of this endocrine end point to disruption by environmental
contaminants (Rolland 2000).In addition to effects on circulating THs, recent in vitro and laboratory animal evidence suggests that PCB and PCDD exposure can
affect TH receptor (TR) activity and TH-responsive gene expression (Zoeller 2005). THs (primarily through the biologically active form of T3) function as signaling molecules that interact with two nuclear receptors, TR-α and
TR-β [whose genes are designated as THRA and THRB, respectively, in GenBank (2006)], and alter their transcription activation and repression activities (Yen 2001). THs are therefore critical to the regulation of the gene expression
machinery required during different life stages of an animal.Although circulating TH levels are often used as biomarkers of contaminant
exposure in wildlife (Chiba et al. 2001; Hall et al. 1998; Jenssen et al. 1995), gene expression end points that exploit the cellular functions of TH
could provide a more sensitive and mechanistically based means to characterize
the thyroid-toxic potential of complex contaminant mixtures
in the real world. Such gene expression analysis might also form the basis
of an early detection approach for POP exposure before the manifestation
of higher-level health effects, such as developmental abnormalities
and neurotoxicity, especially when results are consistent with laboratory-based
observations.Obtaining liver or blood from free-ranging marine mammals is generally
fraught with logistical and ethical challenges. Skin/blubber biopsies
have been used to generate useful information on contaminant concentrations
and, more recently, on toxicologically relevant endocrine end points (Fossi et al. 2003; Miller et al. 2005; Mos and Ross 2002). Gene expression analysis using small biopsies has the potential to become
a useful, sensitive, and minimally invasive biomarker of contaminant
exposure in seals and other wildlife.The objectives of this study were a) to develop TR gene expression biomarkers using skin/blubber biopsies, b) to confirm the utility of using circulating THs as biomarkers of POP
exposure, and c) to assess the feasibility of using TH-related gene expression biomarkers
in free-ranging harbor seals.
Materials and Methods
Sample collection
A total of 39 healthy, young harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) of comparable body weight and condition were live-captured from five
locations in southern British Columbia and northern Washington State during
the summer of 2003 (Figure 1). These locations included three Canadian sites in Queen Charlotte Strait (QCS) (northeastern
Vancouver Island, n = 10) and the Strait of Georgia (City of Vancouver, n = 8; Hornby Island, n = 7), and two U.S. sites in Juan de Fuca Strait (Smith Island, n = 7) and Puget Sound (Gertrude Island, n = 7). Both the accumulation of POPs and biologic end points in
marine mammals are age dependent (Cottrell et al. 2002), so we restricted our sampling to pups ranging in age from 3.5 to 5 weeks. Seals
hauled out on sandy beaches were captured using a rapidly
deployed seine net (Jeffries et al. 1993), whereas those hauled out on rocky inlets were captured one at a time
using a salmon-landing net (Simms and Ross 2000). Seals were kept in hoop nets until sampling and then removed from the
net and manually restrained for tissue and blood collection. Seals were
typically captured at low tides (peak haul-out times), with time of
capture during the day ranging from 0825 hr to 1540 hr across all sites.
Figure 1
Harbor seal pups were live-captured from three sites (Queen Charlotte Strait, Hornby
Island, and Vancouver) in British Columbia, Canada, and
two sites (Smith Island in Juan de Fuca Strait and Gertrude Island in
Puget Sound) in Washington State, USA. Human population densities > 50 persons/km2 are a proxy for possible regional contaminant sources. From State of Washington
Office of Financial Management (2000) and Statistics Canada (2001).
Blood samples were taken from the extradural vein using a Vacutainer blood
collection system with an 18-gauge needle and serum collection tube (Becton-Dickenson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). All collected blood samples
were stored at 4°C in the field. Blood samples were centrifuged
within 5 hr after collection at 400 × g for 20 min. Serum was aspirated and stored in 1 mL aliquots in cryovials
either on dry ice (−80°C) or in liquid nitrogen (−196°C) during transport, and in a freezer (−80°C) until
analysis of TH concentrations was performed.Skin/blubber biopsy samples were taken from an area 20 cm lateral to the
spinal column and anterior to the pelvis. The area was shaved first
with an electric shaver (Sculptor with type-50 blades; Oster, Niles, IL, USA) and
cleaned using Betadine (Purdue Frederick, Pickering, Ontario, Canada) followed
by 95% isopropyl alcohol. Two biopsy samples
were collected: one 3.5 mm in diameter and the other 8 mm, with each
approximately 2–3 cm in depth (Acuderm, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA). After
sample collection, the biopsy area on the animal was disinfected
using Betadine and Aquaphor (Beiersdorf, Wilton, CT, USA) iodine
ointment. The 8-mm-diameter biopsy samples were wrapped in hexane-rinsed
aluminum foil, placed in 2 mL cryovials, and stored immediately
in liquid nitrogen in the field. The 3.5-mm-diameter biopsy samples were
placed into 1.0 mL of the RNA stabilization solution RNAlater (Ambion, Houston, TX, USA) in
RNase-free 1.5 mL cryovials and stored on wet
ice in the field. Blubber samples frozen in liquid nitrogen were subsequently
transferred to −80°C storage in the laboratory, and
biopsy samples in RNAlater were stored at −20°C.Animals were subsequently weighed, sexed, measured for length and axillary
girth, assessed for general body condition, and then released. Captive
time was approximately 15–20 min for captures using the landing
net and less than 60 min for captures using the seine net method. All
procedures were carried out under the auspices of the respective
animal care committees and scientific research permits for researchers
in British Columbia [Fisheries and Oceans Canada Animal Care
Committee using guidelines from the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC 1997); Scientific Research Permit] and in Washington State under U.S. Marine
Mammal Protection Act Scientific Research Permit No. 835 [National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) 1997] issued to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife by National
Marine Fisheries Service.
Tissue homogenization
Because a possible stratification within blubber biopsies could influence
our results, we evaluated the steady-state levels of the normalizer
gene ribosomal protein L8 (L8) in skin and upper and lower blubber sections collected from all animals (Figure 2A). For this, each 3.5-mm-diameter tissue biopsy was separated into skin (~ 2 mm) and
blubber sections using a razor blade before homogenization. Blubber
samples were further divided into lower (close to the muscle) and
upper (close to the skin) sections of 4 mm in depth.
Figure 2
L8 expression in different sections of harbor seal biopsy samples. Steady-state
L8 mRNA levels were measured using total RNA isolated from skin
and upper and lower sections of blubber. (A) Diagram of the specific tissue regions examined. (B) L8 mRNA expression levels for each tissue section indicated. Animals
from five geographic locations were compared: QCS (n = 5), Vancouver (Van; n = 8), Smith Island (n = 7), Hornby Island (n = 7), and Gertrude Island (GI; n = 6). Each box plot shows the median, first and third quartiles, and
maximum and minimum population values.
All blubber samples were homogenized in TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Canada
Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada) using a Retsch MM301 mixer mill as
described by Veldhoen and Helbing (2001) and with the following modifications. Each blubber tissue sample was homogenized
in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube with the addition of 400 μL
TRIzol and a 3-mm-diameter tungsten-carbide bead. For any given
sample, an additional 3–6 min of mixing was performed if unhomogenized
tissue remained after the initial 6 min homogenization period. Because
of the presence of a substantial amount of connective tissue, the
mixer mill procedure was incapable of efficient homogenization
of the skin samples. These samples were homogenized using a PowerGen 125 tissue
homogenizer (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Skin
samples were minced with a razor blade and placed into a 2.0 mL microcentrifuge
tube (Mic Rew Simport Plastics Ltd., CA, USA) containing 400 μL
TRIzol. The shearing head was placed directly into each
sample tube and gradually ramped from 8,000 rpm to approximately 30,000 rpm
for a total of 3 min with 10-sec cooling period intervals every 15 sec
of homogenization. To minimize heat production in the skin samples, tubes
were kept on wet ice during the entire homogenization procedure.
Isolation of total RNA and preparation of cDNA
Total RNA was isolated from the tissue homogenates in TRIzol reagent as
described by the manufacturer. After phase separation, 1 μL glycogen (Roche
Diagnostics, Laval, QC, Canada) was added to each retained
aqueous phase, and RNA was precipitated with the addition of isopropanol
and a 1 hr incubation at −20°C. Total RNA was resuspended
in diethyl pyrocarbonate–treated distilled, deionized
H2O (20 μL for blubber and 40 μL for skin samples) and stored
at −70°C.Total cDNA was produced using Superscript II RNase H− reverse transcriptase as described by the manufacturer (Invitrogen Canada
Inc.). One microgram of total RNA from each sample was annealed with 500 ng
random hexamer oligonucleotide (Amersham Biosciences Inc., Baie
D’urfe, Quebec, Canada) at 65°C for 10 min and placed
on wet ice. The assembled 20 μL cDNA synthesis reactions were
incubated at 42°C for 2 hr and diluted 20-fold before real-time
quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) analysis.
Cloning of TR cDNA sequences
Target cDNA sequences representative of the gene transcripts TR-α and TR-β as well as our control gene, L8, were amplified using primers designed using Primer Premier software (version 4.1; Premier
Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and synthesized
by AlphaDNA (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) (Table 1). Each 25 μL DNA amplification reaction included 2 μL
of 20-fold total cDNA template, 20 pmol of each primer, 200 μM
equimolar dNTPs (dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP), and 2.5 units of Taq DNA
polymerase (Invitrogen Canada Inc.). DNA amplification was performed
on a Gene Amp PCR System 9700 (PerkinElmer Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using
the following thermocycle conditions: denaturation at 95°C (5 min); 35 cycles of 94°C (1 min), 53°C (1 min), and 72°C (2 min); and an elongation step at 72°C (7 min). DNA
products were separated on a 1.5% agarose gel and
visualized with ethidium bromide staining on a ChemiImager 4000 (Alpha
Innotech Corp., San Leandro, CA, USA). DNA bands representing TR-α [631 base pairs (bp)], TR-β (801 bp), and L8 (602 bp and 126 bp) were excised and isolated by three repeated 5-min
freeze/thaw cycles followed by a 10 min centrifugation at 12,000 × g (Smith 1980). Isolated cDNA products (4 μL) were cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO vector
using the TOPO TA Cloning Kit (Invitrogen Canada Inc.). Plasmid
DNA was purified from selected transformants using the QIAprep Spin Miniprep
Kit (Qiagen, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada), and the presence of
insert sequence was confirmed by restriction analysis using EcoRI (Amersham Biosciences). The identity of each cloned cDNA was determined
by DNA sequencing followed by BLASTn analysis (National Center for Biotechnology Information 2006). Primer sequences are shown in Table 1, and cloned sequences have been submitted to GenBank (2006).
Table 1
DNA primers used in the cloning and QPCR analysis of harbor seal target
genes.
Method
Gene
Primer name
GenBank accession no.
Amplicon size (bp)
Primer sequences
Cloning
Ribosomal protein L8a
UL8up
DQ212693
126
5′-GGTGTGGCTATGAATCCTGT-3′
L8–2dn
5′-ACGACGAGCAGCAATAAGAC-3′
Ribosomal protein L8
PV3
DQ212694
602
5′-CCGCCATGGGCCGTGTGATC-3′
PV4
5′-CGTACTCGTGGCCAGCAGTT-3′
TR-α
PV6
DQ212695
631
5′-TGCTGCATTATCGACAAGATCAC-3′
PV8
5′-GTGACTTGCCCAGTTCAAAGATGG-3′
TR-β
PV12
DQ212696
801
5′-TATTCCTGTAAATATGAAGG-3′
PV16
5′-GTAATTGATATAGTGTTCAAA-3′
QPCR
TR-α
PV19
—
231
5′-CGACGGAAGGAGGAAATG-3′
PV20
5′-GATCTTGGTAAACTCGCTGAA-3′
TR-β
PV30
—
425
5′-AGAGGCTGGCAAAGAGGA-3′
PV31
5′-ACTTTCTGGGTCATAGCG-3′
These primers were also used for QPCR analysis.
QPCR assay
Primers specific for seal TR-α, TR-β, and L8 were designed for the reverse-transcription QPCR assay (Table 1). Quantitative DNA amplification reactions (15 μL) were performed
on a MX4000 system (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) as described previously (Crump et al. 2002). Each sample was prepared in quadruplicate, and the derived copy number
values were averaged. The copy number for each gene transcript was
determined from standard curves generated from the cloned plasmids in
the previous section. TR-α and TR-β expression values were normalized to those of the expression
of the L8 internal control. The expression of this gene has been found to be invariant
in many tissue types during developmentally associated changes
in endogenous TH concentrations in reptiles (Katsu et al. 2004) and amphibians (Shi and Liang 1994).
TH assay
The concentrations of total T4 (TT4), free T4 (FT4), total T3 (TT3), and free T3 (FT3) were measured in animals from all five locations (n = 39) using related EIAgen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits
and by following the manufacturer’s recommended protocol (Adaltus, Montréal, Quebec, Canada). Frozen (undiluted) serum
samples were thawed on wet ice, and all four TH measurements were
obtained within 6 hr. For each ELISA assay, reactions were prepared
in triplicate, and the signal intensity of seal serum samples and TH
standards was measured at 450 nm on an MRX microplate reader (Dynatech
Laboratories Inc., Chantilly, VA, USA). The sample data were subsequently
averaged and compared with the standard curve in order to obtain
representative TH concentration values.Interassay variation was evaluated in two ways. First, we regularly included
a pooled seal serum sample as a reference, and results were accepted
for any given assay only when reference results were ± 20% of
expected values. Second, total hormone measurements (TT3 and TT4) were validated using the manufacturer’s reference standard (Thyroid
Calver reagent; Casco Neal, Portland, ME, USA), and results were
accepted for an assay only when concentrations were within ± 5% of
expected values.No purified harbor seal THs are commercially available. With this in mind, we
validated the TH assays for harbor seals by conducting analyses
of serial dilutions within a fixed sample volume and using incremental
spikes of seal serum with Thyroid Calver reagent. Responses of serial
dilutions of seal serum and standard additions of seal serum with the
reference standard both produced linear results (data not shown).
Measurement of POP concentrations in blubber tissue
Each frozen (−80°C) 8 mm tissue biopsy was cut vertically, and
the upper skin layer (~ 2 mm) removed. A portion of each blubber
sample (100–300 mg wet weight) was used in the analysis for
all PCB congeners and for specific PCDD and PCDF congeners using high-resolution
gas chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis
at the Fisheries and Oceans Canada Regional Contaminant Laboratory (Institute
of Ocean Sciences, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada). Details
of the chromatography and mass spectrometry conditions, the criteria
used for chemical identification and quantification, and the quality
assurance and quality control practices have been previously described (Ikonomou et al. 2001).Although 154 PCB peaks were quantified (out of 209 theoretical congeners), many
congeners were not detectable in all of the samples. ∑PCB
concentration was therefore calculated using the following rules. If
a congener was detected in > 70% of the sample population, the
minimum detection limit substitutions were made. Where congeners
were detected in < 70% of samples, the minimum detection
limit was set at zero. Sample lipid values were also measured, and the
concentration of POPs was expressed on a lipid weight (lw) basis. Total
toxic equivalents (∑TEQs) to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin were calculated for all dioxin-like PCBs (12 congeners), PCDD (7 congeners), and
PCDF (10 congeners) using the most recently reported
international mammalian toxic equivalency factors (Van den Berg et al. 1998).
Statistical analyses
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 12; SPSS
Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results were evaluated by site and among
all individuals. For the former, harbor seal pups from five sites were
compared for circulating TH concentrations and steady-state mRNA expression
levels in skin and blubber biopsy samples. Seals from the remote
QCS, previously (and in this study) shown to be relatively uncontaminated (Ross et al. 2004), were used as a reference group. For each group, values were examined
for normality with the Shapiro-Wilk test and for homogeneity of variances
using Levine’s test. Groups that were normal with equal variance
were evaluated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess
intergroup differences followed by Tukey’s honest significant
difference (HSD) test. If the data were not normally distributed, a
Kruskal-Wallis test was used followed by a Mann-Whitney U test for pairwise comparison of groups. Significance was defined as p < 0.05. Extreme outliers, defined as values more than three times the
interquartile range, were removed.For the among-individual assessment of the entire study group, correlation
analysis was carried out using the Pearson method for normally distributed
data or the nonparametric Kendall’s tau-b method when
data were not normally distributed. Given our concern that body weight (~ age) of
the harbor seal pups might influence either contaminant concentrations
or thyroid end points, we conducted regressions between
body weight and contaminant concentrations, TH concentrations, and TR
levels. If body weight exhibited a significant relationship with contaminant
or thyroid measurements, we conducted multiple regression analysis
to identify the relative contribution of each variable.
Results
Of the 39 harbor seals sampled, availability of adequate tissue quality
and cost considerations for contaminant analyses resulted in the analysis
of 39 serum samples for TH measurement, 35 biopsies (3.5 mm) for
gene expression analysis, and 24 blubber biopsies (8 mm) for contaminant
analysis.The mean ± SE body weight was 20.6 ± 0.52 kg (range, 14.1–27.0 kg). Our
ANOVA results revealed a significant difference
among sites. A subsequent Tukey’s HSD test indicated that only
Smith Island seals differed, being slightly heavier than QCS seals (p = 0.038).
TR gene sequences in the harbor seal
Partial cDNA sequences were isolated from biopsied harbor seal blubber
that represented expressed mRNA of TR-α and TR-β genes, as well as our control gene, L8. Both TR sequences obtained are predicted to encompass approximately half of the
estimated open reading frame region within the mRNA transcripts and
include sequence located between the encoded DNA-binding and ligand-binding
domains. A comparison of harbor seal TR sequences with six other species using the ClustalW alignment program (European Bioinformatics Institute 2006) indicated that the mRNA sequence for TR-α and TR-β are highly conserved among these vertebrates (Table 2). This is particularly evident within mammals, where the putative protein
sequences of harbor seal TR-α and TR-β display > 99% amino acid identity.
Table 2
Comparison of harbor seal TR-α and TR-β cDNA and putative protein sequences of other species.
Phoca vitulina TR-α
Phoca vitulina TR-β
Species
GenBank accession no.
Nucleotidea (584 bp)
Amino acida (194 aa)
GenBank accession no.
Nucleotidea (760 bp)
Amino acida (253 aa)
Homo sapiens
BC035137
95
100
NM00461
94
100
Ovis aries
Z68308
96
100
Z68307
89
99
Mus musculus
BC046795
92
100
NM009380
90
99
Gallus gallus
NM205313
84
93
NM205447
86
95
Danio rerio
U54796
77
85
NM131340
75
89
Xenopus laevis
L76285
79
92
M35361
79
93
Values represent identity for the comparable nucleotide and putative amino
acid sequences.
Measurement of TR expression in skin/blubber biopsies
Based on the cDNA sequence obtained, oligonucleotide primers were developed
for QPCR analysis of specific gene expression biomarkers. Significant
variation in L8 mRNA expression (p < 0.05, Tukey’s HSD or Mann-Whitney U-test) within the vertical plane of the biopsy tissue sample was observed
for all sample sections, with the exception of QCS and Gertrude Island (Figure 2B). We then compared each section (skin, upper blubber, and lower blubber) separately
across the animals from different locations. Both the skin
and the upper blubber (adjacent to skin) sections showed a significant
difference in L8 mRNA expression among sites (skin: p < 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis; upper blubber: p = 0.028, Kruskal-Wallis). However, L8 steady-state transcript levels in the lower blubber region did not differ
among sites (p = 0.05, ANOVA; p > 0.05, Tukey). Therefore, we chose the amount of L8 transcript in the lower blubber as a suitable normalizer gene for the
comparison of gene expression levels between the different seal populations. All
subsequent QPCR analyses of TR transcript copy numbers are presented for lower blubber sections only.TR-α mRNA abundance was found to be significantly higher than that
of TR-β (p = 0.004, Tukey) in all the individuals examined (Table 3). In addition, the relationship between TR-α and TR-β mRNA
expression patterns was positively correlated (R = 0.651). In comparisons of animals from different geographic
locations, Gertrude Island samples displayed a significant elevation in
both TR-α (p < 0.001, Tukey) and TR-β (p = 0.011, Tukey) transcript levels compared with animals from the
QCS reference site.
Table 3
Steady-state levels of TR-α and TR-β transcripts measured in the lower blubber biopsy section from
harbor seal pups in coastal British Columbia and Washington State.
QCS (n = 10)
Vancouver (n = 7)
Hornby Island (n = 7)
Smith Island (n = 5)
Gertrude Island (n = 6)
TR-α
1,309 ± 125 (699–1,863)
1,341 ± 193 (590–1,927)
2,459 ± 531 (988–4,561)
802 ± 148 (464–1,185)
3,633 ± 446* (2,539–5,163)
TR-β
973 ± 246 (437–2,984)
799 ± 88 (519–1,254)
920 ± 194 (362–1,732)
511 ± 26 (458–603)
1,387 ± 142* (936–1,863)
Data are mean ± SE of the copy numbers per reaction (range). Data
from QCS animals were used as the reference values for statistical
analyses.
Significant difference in gene expression (p < 0.05).
Serum TH levels
The concentrations of different TH forms were measured in serum collected
from the seal pups by site (Table 4). Among the seals sampled from different locations, Gertrude Island animals
had significantly lower TT4 and FT4 compared with reference site QCS animals (p < 0.001, Tukey; p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney). A strong positive correlation was found between
measured TT4 and FT4 levels (R = 0.844, p < 0.001) among all individuals, whereas no correlation existed between
TT3 and FT3 serum concentrations (R = 0.260, p = 0.121). Negative correlations between circulating TT4 and TR-α mRNA levels (R = −0.456, p < 0.05) and circulating FT4 and TR-α expression (R = −0.481, p < 0.05) were detected. No correlation was observed between any serum
TH measurement and TR-β transcript levels (data not shown).
Table 4
Circulating TH concentrations in harbor seal pups from five sites in coastal
British Columbia and Washington State.
QCS (n = 10)
Vancouver (n = 8)
Hornby Island (n = 7)
Smith Island (n = 7)
Gertrude Island (n = 7)
TT4 (nmol/L)
71.8 ± 9.0 (41.1–120.5)
74.4 ± 6.6 (47.2–98.5)
59.4 ± 4.9 (43.3–81.5)
56.5 ± 9.8 (12.6–86.7)
26.3 ± 4.3* (15.1–44.8)
FT4 (pmol/L)
37.8 ± 2.4 (28.3– 49.5)
39.2 ± 2.6 (25.1–47.4)
32.7 ± 0.8 (29.2–35.5)
32.9 ± 3.0 (24.0–46.6)
22.3 ± 2.1* (16.9–32.7)
TT3 (nmol/L)
0.72 ± 0.14 (0.22–1.57)
0.80 ± 0.08 (0.55–1.18)
0.28 ± 0.08 (0.08–0.64)
0.64 ± 0.07 (0.28–0.84)
0.70 ± 0.10 (0.40–1.10)
FT3 (pmol/L)
7.61 ± 0.67 (4.49–10.15)
7.15 ± 0.51 (5.41–9.42)
7.91 ± 1.58 (3.69–12.13)
6.81 ± 0.58 (4.91–8.90)
8.99 ± 0.99 (5.17–13.33)
Data are mean ± SE (range). Data from QCS animals were used as
reference values for statistical analyses.
Significant difference in gene expression (p < 0.05).
POP concentrations in blubber
Of a total of 154 PCB congener peaks quantified, 135 peaks were detected
in QCS seals, 142 peaks in Smith Island seals, and 153 peaks in Gertrude
Island seals. Four of 24 seals were identified as extreme outliers
in the TEQ calculations and were removed from further analysis. Seal
pups located on Gertrude Island showed an approximate 10-fold higher ∑PCB
concentration (6.2 ± 1.0 mg/kg, lw) compared with
animals from the reference QCS (0.7 ± 0.1 mg/kg, lw; p < 0.001, Tukey) and 5-fold higher than animals from Smith Island (1.3 ± 0.2 mg/kg, lw; p < 0.001, Tukey). Calculated ∑TEQ values for PCBs, PCDDs, and
PCDFs were also significantly higher in seal pups on Gertrude Island (70.4 ± 16.5 ng/kg) compared with animals from QCS (12.6 ± 2.2 ng/kg; p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney) but did not differ significantly from those
from Smith Island (24.9 ± 11.6 ng/kg; p = 0.052, Mann-Whitney). PCBs were the major constituent measured
among contaminant classes measured in study animals, which included
PCBs, PCDDs, and PCDFs, and were also the dominant contributor to ∑TEQ (PCBs
represented an average of 43.4% in QCS seals, 59.2% for
Smith Island seals, and 90.1% for Gertrude Island
seals). More details on contaminant levels and patterns in harbor
seals from this region are available elsewhere (Ross et al. 2004).
Correlation of TH and TR end points with POP exposure
∑PCB concentrations were negatively correlated with circulating
TT4 (R = −0.711, p < 0.001) (Table 5, Figure 3) and FT4 (R = −0.724, p < 0.001, Table 5). In contrast, a positive correlation was observed between ∑PCB
concentrations and the level of TR-α mRNA (R = 0.679, p < 0.01) (Table 5, Figure 4). Similarly, negative correlations were also found between ∑TEQ
and circulating TT4 (R = −0.495, p < 0.01), and positive correlations with the level of TR-α expression in the blubber (R = 0.464, p < 0.01).
Table 5
Correlation between contaminant concentrations (∑PCBs and ∑TEQ) in
seal blubber and circulating TH concentrations and TR gene expression from the lower blubber biopsy section for all seals from
five sites in British Columbia and Washington State.
Serum TH
Blubber
TT4
FT4
TT3
FT3
TR-α
TR-β
∑PCBs
−0.711** (< 0.001)
−0.724** (< 0.001)
−0.111 (0.616)
0.108 (0.624)
0.679** (0.001)
0.360 (0.119)
∑TEQ
−0.495** (0.002)
−0.360* (0.027)
−0.042 (0.795)
0.053 (0.746)
0.464** (0.007)
0.373* (0.031)
Data are correlation coefficients (p-values).
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.
Figure 3
Correlation analysis of circulating TT4 levels with ∑PCB measured in blubber of harbor seal pups from
the southern coast of British Columbia and northern Washington State. A
significant negative correlation is noted. R = −0.711; p < 0.01.
Figure 4
Correlation analysis of relative TR-α mRNA expression with ∑PCB
concentrations measured in the lower blubber biopsy section of harbor
seal pups from the southern coast of British Columbia and northern
Washington State. A significant positive correlation is noted. R = 0.679; p < 0.01.
Although we limited our studies to seals of a similar body weight (~ age), the
potential confounding influence of age on both PCB concentration
and thyroid end points remained a concern. Subsequent regression analysis
revealed that body weight did not correlate with TT3, TR-α, TR-β, ∑PCBs, or ∑TEQ (data not shown). However, there
were negative correlations between body weight and TT4, FT3, and FT4. We found no correlation between FT3 and PCBs, so we did not further evaluate this relationship. Multiple regression
analysis showed that, although both PCB concentrations and body
weight correlated with TT4 and FT4, PCBs were the primary exploratory variable in the observed thyroid changes, whereas
body weight was not significant for TT4 (PCBs: partial R = 0.71, p < 0.001; body weight: partial R = 0.27, p = 0.08) or FT4 (PCBs: partial R = 0.72, p < 0.001; body weight: partial R = 0.33, p = 0.14). There were no significant correlations between any of
the endocrine end points and time of day for each capture (data not shown), suggesting
that circadian rhythm did not unduly influence our results. Likewise, there
was no correlation between time held (restraint) before
release and any of the endocrine end points, suggesting that
stress was not a factor (data not shown).
Discussion
A “weight of evidence” from laboratory-based studies, captive
feeding studies of seals, and studies of free-ranging marine mammals
highlights the endocrine-disrupting nature of complex mixtures of
POPs and many of their constituents (Ross 2000). Although mechanisms of action are often ill-defined in field studies, a
common pattern of adverse health effects observed in contaminant-exposed
individuals and populations includes developmental, immunologic, and
reproductive effects. Despite having been banned in North America
for three decades, the highly persistent PCBs continue to present a
toxic risk to wildlife and dominated the contaminant profiles in our study
of British Columbia and Washington State harbor seals. Gertrude Island (Puget
Sound) harbor seals were particularly contaminated, having
PCB concentrations that were several times higher than those sampled
in the adjacent coastal waters of northern Washington State and southern
and central British Columbia.Elevated POP exposure has been associated with altered circulating vitamin
A and immune function in free-ranging harbor seals sampled from the
same study areas (Levin et al. 2005; Simms et al. 2000). Our observed negative relationship between circulating TT4 and PCB concentrations in harbor seals contributes to the notion that
PCBs represent a significant health concern at the top of the food chain. This
finding is consistent with previous observations of contaminant-related
reductions in TH concentrations in captive seals fed contaminated
fish (Brouwer et al. 1989) and in free-ranging pinnipeds (Chiba et al. 2001; Debier et al. 2005; Hall et al. 1998; Jenssen et al. 1995). Histopathologic lesions, including fibrosis and colloid depletion, in
thyroid glands of seals inhabiting PCB-contaminated areas (Schumacher et al. 1993) may explain reduced TH levels in our contaminated seals. However, laboratory
animal studies provide more information on possible mechanisms
of action, where altered hormone synthesis in the thyroid gland, disrupted
circulatory transport, and altered metabolic enzyme activity have
been observed (Brouwer et al. 1998). Our findings suggest that the more contaminated seals from Gertrude
Island may be considered hypothyroid (Haulena et al. 1998), highlighting concerns about the health of high trophic level wildlife
in this region.THs play a critical role in regulating a wide range of physiologic processes
such as growth, development, and metabolism, largely through binding
to the nuclear receptors TR-α and TR-β, and modulate their activity on TH-responsive gene promoters (Wu and Koenig 2000). PCBs can also directly affect TR activity and TH-responsive gene expression. The
observed differential relationship between TR-α and TR-β transcripts in seal blubber samples relative to PCB levels may
indicate a particular vulnerability of the TR-α gene. This may be related to the apparent hypothyroidism observed
in the more contaminated animals. Interestingly, increased TR-α expression has been observed in the brains of hypothyroid compared
with euthyroid rats (Constantinou et al. 2005). Positively TH-regulated genes were up-regulated in postnatal and fetal
rats brains after in utero exposure to the PCB mixture Aroclor 1254 despite a reduction in the dam’s
circulating TH levels (Gauger et al. 2004; Zoeller et al. 2000). These results suggest that PCBs may interfere directly or indirectly
with TH signaling, leading to changes in TH-responsive gene expression.Altered circulating TH levels in PCB-exposed marine mammals provide evidence
of an effect on this endocrine end point. However, obtaining blood
samples is not always feasible, and skin/blubber biopsies essentially
represent the only obtainable samples for many marine mammals, including
cetaceans. In addition, circulating TH levels can be influenced
by a number of natural factors and may not present a rigorous assessment
of thyroid status. We therefore developed a gene expression biomarker
approach using TR expression levels in blubber/skin biopsies in order to evaluate the utility
of such an approach for harbor seals and other marine mammals. Using
this biopsy-based sampling technique, we were able to quantify the
expression of TR genes in blubber. Although we focused on TR expression in these studies, other emerging gene expression biomarkers
could be examined in the same way. Expression levels of the aryl hydrocarbon
receptor or cytochrome P450 as gene expression biomarkers in liver
have already been suggested for marine mammals (Kim and Hahn 2002).The positive correlation between blubber TR-α and PCB concentrations in harbor seals suggests that contaminants
either directly or indirectly affect this TH end point and may alter
TH-regulated gene expression. The high degree of sequence conservation
between harbor seals and other vertebrates accentuates the likely functional
similarity of TRs between animal groups. Although our results
would suggest that PCBs affect systemic thyroid homeostasis in harbor
seals, our detection of contaminant-related alteration of TR gene expression in blubber raises a toxicologic concern of particular
note for marine mammals. TH is known to play an important role in the
maintenance and function of adipose tissue (Ailhaud et al. 1992). T3 treatment can induce adipocyte cell proliferation, fat cell cluster formation, lipid
accumulation, and increased malic enzyme and glycerophosphate
dehydrogenase activities in young rats as well as in preadipocyte
cell lines (Flores-Delgado et al. 1987; Grimaldi et al. 1982). TRs within murine adipocytes predominantly are composed of the TR-α isoform, with little detectable TR-β isoform (Jiang et al. 2004), consistent with our findings in blubber. Recently, several TH-regulated
genes were identified in human and mouse adipose tissue that encode
for protein products involved in lipid metabolism (Viguerie et al. 2002).Blubber is a specialized adipose tissue layer under the skin of marine
mammals and is vital for energy storage, heat insulation, thermogenesis, and
buoyancy control. Blubber is typically viewed as a storage depot
associated with lipid reserves, within which lipids, lipid classes, and
fatty acid profiles have been characterized in physiologic and energetic
studies of marine mammals (Iverson et al. 1997; Mellish et al. 1999). However, blubber also represents an important storage site for micronutrients, holding
as much as 66% of the body burden of vitamin
A in harbor seals (Mos and Ross 2002). Our finding of TR-α in blubber highlights the metabolically dynamic nature of this tissue
because this receptor mediates the actions of TH-dependent metabolism
and homeostasis. We speculate that contaminants might therefore
present a risk to the structural and functional integrity of blubber because
metabolism within adipocytes may be altered. The influence of TH-related
processes on body weight in laboratory animals and in humans (Baxter et al. 2004; Pelletier et al. 2003) underscores the potential effects of a disruption of TR on such critical
processes as energy storage and thermoregulation in marine mammals.Our biomarker-based thyroid assessment may be applied to studies of other
species for which blood samples are not available because of logistical
constraints (e.g., cetaceans). The contaminant-associated decrease
in circulating TH levels and concomitant up-regulation of TR-α expression in blubber of harbor seals may indicate an increased
risk of TH-dependent health effects, such as developmental abnormalities
and neurotoxicity. In addition, altered TR-α gene expression in blubber may have profound consequences for metabolic
turnover and energetics in contaminated marine mammal populations.
Authors: Cathy Debier; Gina M Ylitalo; Michael Weise; Frances Gulland; Daniel P Costa; Burney J Le Boeuf; Tanguy de Tillesse; Yvan Larondelle Journal: Environ Pollut Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 8.071
Authors: Christian Sonne; Rune Dietz; Erik W Born; Frank F Riget; Maja Kirkegaard; Lars Hyldstrup; Robert J Letcher; Derek C G Muir Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Lori H Schwacke; Eric S Zolman; Brian C Balmer; Sylvain De Guise; R Clay George; Jennifer Hoguet; Aleta A Hohn; John R Kucklick; Steve Lamb; Milton Levin; Jenny A Litz; Wayne E McFee; Ned J Place; Forrest I Townsend; Randall S Wells; Teresa K Rowles Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Jessica L Reiner; Paul R Becker; Matthew O Gribble; Jennifer M Lynch; Amanda J Moors; Jennifer Ness; Danielle Peterson; Rebecca S Pugh; Tamika Ragland; Catherine Rimmer; Jody Rhoderick; Michele M Schantz; Jennifer Trevillian; John R Kucklick Journal: Arch Environ Contam Toxicol Date: 2015-07-04 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Frances M Van Dolah; Marion G Neely; Lauren E McGeorge; Brian C Balmer; Gina M Ylitalo; Eric S Zolman; Todd Speakman; Carrie Sinclair; Nicholas M Kellar; Patricia E Rosel; Keith D Mullin; Lori H Schwacke Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kathleen E Hunt; Michael J Moore; Rosalind M Rolland; Nicholas M Kellar; Ailsa J Hall; Joanna Kershaw; Stephen A Raverty; Cristina E Davis; Laura C Yeates; Deborah A Fauquier; Teresa K Rowles; Scott D Kraus Journal: Conserv Physiol Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 3.079