Literature DB >> 16835007

Radical prostatectomy in Austria: a nationwide analysis of 16,524 cases.

Badereddin Al-Ali Mohamad1, Martin Marszalek, Clemens Brössner, Anton Ponholzer, Clemens Wehrberger, Manfred Willinger, Stephan Madersbacher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyse demographics and outcome of radical prostatectomy (RPE) in Austria in a nationwide series.
METHODS: All patients (n=16,524) who underwent RPE in public hospitals (covering 95% of all surgical procedures) in Austria between 1992 and 2003 were analysed. Patient demographics, interventions for anastomotic strictures/urinary incontinence/inguinal hernias, perioperative mortality, and overall survival (OS) were determined. Data were provided by the Austrian Health Institute (OBIG). For decades Austria has had a public and equal access health system with compulsory insurance coverage.
RESULTS: The annual number of RPEs increased from 396 in 1992 to 2640 (+666%) in 2003; the mean age at surgery declined from 64+/-6.3 yr (1992) to 62.0+/-6.7 yr (2003). An endourologic intervention for anastomotic strictures was performed in 8.5% (45-49 yr: 5.8%; 70-74 yr: 10.8%). An artificial urinary sphincter was implanted in 1.6% with a 5-fold increase from the youngest (0.5%; 45-49 yr) to 2.5% in those aged 70-74 yr. Overall, 6.4% of men underwent an inguinal herniotomy after RPE. The 30-d mortality rate was 0.12%. The 5-yr OS declined from 95% in those aged 50-59 yr to 89.8% in those aged 60-69 yr to 82% in the oldest age group (70-79 yr).
CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide analysis describes the current standard of RPE in Austria. The perioperative mortality was low, the risk of total incontinence acceptable, and the OS indistinguishable to the life expectancy of the age-matched male population in Austria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16835007     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  6 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer in senior adults: over- or undertreated?

Authors:  Ingrid Berger; Franz Böhmer; Anton Ponholzer; Stephan Madersbacher
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2009

Review 2.  Post-prostatectomy incontinence: Etiology, evaluation, and management.

Authors:  Nirmish Singla; Ajay K Singla
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-03

Review 3.  Does robotic prostatectomy meet its promise in the management of prostate cancer?

Authors:  Kuo-How Huang; Stacey C Carter; Jim C Hu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy: comparison of the open and robotic approaches for treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2012

5.  Radical prostatectomies in Austria, 1997-2004.

Authors:  Gerald Haidinger; Stephan Madersbacher; Georg Schatzl; Christian Vutuc
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2008-07-21

6.  The Urological Society of India survey on urinary incontinence practice patterns among urologists.

Authors:  Sanjay Sinha; Shirish Yande; Anita Patel; Ajit Vaze; Kalyan Sarkar; Shailesh Raina; Mayank Mohan Agarwal; Pawan Vasudeva; Nikhil Khattar; Vijay Kumar Sarma Madduri; Nagendranath Mishra; Amita Jain; Manu Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.