Literature DB >> 16834833

Allergy medication in Japanese volunteers: treatment effect of single doses on nocturnal sleep architecture and next day residual effects.

Julia Boyle1, Malin Eriksson, Neil Stanley, Tomoe Fujita, Yuji Kumagi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the acute effects of two histamine H(1)-receptor antagonists on nocturnal sleep architecture and on next day cognitive function and psychomotor performance.
METHODS: This was a single-site, randomized, double-blind, 3-way crossover study, comparing the effects of a single dose of chlorpheniramine (6 mg), fexofenadine (120 mg) and placebo in 18 healthy (male and female) Japanese volunteers aged 20-55 years. Volunteers were resident for 3 days and each period was separated by a minimum 5-day washout period. The three treatments were administered at 23.00 h. Overnight sleep was measured from 23.00 h to 07.00 h using polysomnography. Residual effects were studied at 07.00 h and 9.00 h the next morning, with the latency to sleep (sleep latency test) measured at 09.30 h.
RESULTS: Compared with placebo, chlorpheniramine increased the latencies to sleep onset and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep (p < or = 0.05 for both), and reduced the duration of REM sleep (p <or= 0.01), but this was not observed with fexofenadine. As far as residual effects the next morning were concerned there were decrements in performance with chlorpheniramine, but not with fexofenadine. Chlorpheniramine 6 mg impaired divided attention (p < 0.001), vigilance (p < 0.05), working memory (p < 0.0001) and sensori-motor performance (p < 0.01), and the latency to daytime sleep was reduced (p < 0.0001). Six adverse events possibly related to study medication were reported during the study, three of which were related to placebo, two to fexofenadine and one to chlorpheniramine.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that a single nocturnal dose of fexofenadine has advantages over the first-generation antihistamine chlorpheniramine, being free of disruption of night-time sleep and detrimental effects on cognitive performance the next day. It is likely that this advantage will remain with chronic ingestion, but this would need to be confirmed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16834833     DOI: 10.1185/030079906X112660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  12 in total

Review 1.  Antihistamines and allergy.

Authors:  Katrina L Randall; Carolyn A Hawkins
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2018-04-03

2.  Evaluation of treatment satisfaction in children with allergic disease treated with an antihistamine: an international, non-interventional, retrospective study.

Authors:  Marta Ferrer; Mário Morais-Almeida; Margarita Guizova; Roman Khanferyan
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Chronically Impairs Sleep- and Wake-Dependent Emotional Processing.

Authors:  Janna Mantua; Owen S Henry; Nolan F Garskovas; Rebecca M C Spencer
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Induction of prolonged, continuous slow-wave sleep by blocking cerebral H₁ histamine receptors in rats.

Authors:  Masami Ikeda-Sagara; Tomoya Ozaki; Mohammad Shahid; Eri Morioka; Kazuma Wada; Kazuki Honda; Ayana Hori; Yuji Matsuya; Naoki Toyooka; Masayuki Ikeda
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  Efficacy and Safety of Non-brain Penetrating H1-Antihistamines for the Treatment of Allergic Diseases.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Yanai; Takeo Yoshikawa; Martin K Church
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022

6.  Influence of health behaviours on the incidence of infection and allergy in adolescents: the AFINOS cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Esther Nova; David Martínez-Gómez; Sonia Gómez-Martínez; Ana M Veses; Maria E Calle; Oscar L Veiga; Ascensión Marcos
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Central nervous system effects of the second-generation antihistamines marketed in Japan--review of inter-drug differences using the proportional impairment ratio (PIR)-.

Authors:  Tatsuya Isomura; Takeshi Kono; Ian Hindmarch; Norimasa Kikuchi; Aya Murakami; Kyoko Inuzuka; Seiji Kawana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Pharmacology of antihistamines.

Authors:  Diana S Church; Martin K Church
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.084

9.  Pharmacology of antihistamines.

Authors:  Martin K Church; Diana S Church
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 10.  CSACI position statement: Newer generation H1-antihistamines are safer than first-generation H1-antihistamines and should be the first-line antihistamines for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria.

Authors:  Michael N Fein; David A Fischer; Andrew W O'Keefe; Gord L Sussman
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.