Literature DB >> 16834567

Prognosis in critical care.

Lucila Ohno-Machado1, Frederic S Resnic, Michael E Matheny.   

Abstract

Prognostic risk prediction models have been employed in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting since the 1980s and provide health care providers with important information to help inform decisions related to treatment and prognosis, as well as to compare outcomes across institutions. Prognostic models for critical care are among the most widely utilized and tested predictive models in healthcare. In this article, we review and compare mortality prediction models, including the APACHE (1981), SAPS (1984), APACHE-II (1985), MPM (1987), APACHE-III (1991), SAPS-II (1993), and MPM-II (1993). We emphasize the importance of model calibration in this domain. In addition, we present a brief review of the statistical methodology, multiple logistic regression, which underlies most of the models currently used in critical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16834567     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng        ISSN: 1523-9829            Impact factor:   9.590


  18 in total

1.  ICU acuity: real-time models versus daily models.

Authors:  Caleb W Hug; Peter Szolovits
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2009-11-14

2.  Prediction of clinical conditions after coronary bypass surgery using dynamic data analysis.

Authors:  K Van Loon; F Guiza; G Meyfroidt; J-M Aerts; J Ramon; H Blockeel; M Bruynooghe; G Van den Berghe; D Berckmans
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Is there an advantage in scoring early embryos on more than one day?

Authors:  Catherine Racowsky; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Jihoon Kim; John D Biggers
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  A nonparametric updating method to correct clinical prediction model drift.

Authors:  Sharon E Davis; Robert A Greevy; Christopher Fonnesbeck; Thomas A Lasko; Colin G Walsh; Michael E Matheny
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Calibration Drift Among Regression and Machine Learning Models for Hospital Mortality.

Authors:  Sharon E Davis; Thomas A Lasko; Guanhua Chen; Michael E Matheny
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

6.  Prognostic physiology: modeling patient severity in Intensive Care Units using radial domain folding.

Authors:  Rohit Joshi; Peter Szolovits
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

7.  Predicting 30-Day Hospital Readmission Risk in a National Cohort of Patients with Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Jejo D Koola; Sam B Ho; Aize Cao; Guanhua Chen; Amy M Perkins; Sharon E Davis; Michael E Matheny
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Persisting high levels of plasma pentraxin 3 over the first days after severe sepsis and septic shock onset are associated with mortality.

Authors:  Tommaso Mauri; Giacomo Bellani; Nicolo' Patroniti; Andrea Coppadoro; Giuseppe Peri; Ivan Cuccovillo; Massimo Cugno; Gaetano Iapichino; Luciano Gattinoni; Antonio Pesenti; Alberto Mantovani
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  ICU Outcome Predictions using Physiologic Trends in the First Two Days.

Authors:  Mehmet Kayaalp
Journal:  Comput Cardiol (2010)       Date:  2012

10.  An in-hospital mortality equation for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units.

Authors:  Takeshi Umegaki; Masaji Nishimura; Kimitaka Tajimi; Kiyohide Fushimi; Hiroshi Ikai; Yuichi Imanaka
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 2.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.