Literature DB >> 16833252

Distraction osteogenesis for craniosynostosis.

T Akizuki1, Y Komuro, K Ohmori.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors describe the use of distraction devices and surgical techniques of distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of patients with craniosynostosis.
METHODS: Since 1994, the authors have performed distraction procedures in 23 patients with craniosynostosis in whom osteogenesis was achieved. Thirteen of the 23 patients underwent a complete Le Fort III midface osteotomy and distraction. In 10 patients the distraction osteogenesis involved the cranial bone; six underwent combined forehead and midface distraction (Le Fort IV distraction) in which multiple internal devices were used after performing a Le Fort IV osteotomy. An external distraction procedure was used to treat the first two cases. Since 1996, the authors have used internal devices developed in their unit. Distraction was initiated 1 week after the osteotomy at the rate of 0.5 mm per day for the cranium and 1.0 mm per day for the midface. The consolidation phase after distraction was initiated was 2 to 3 months. No major complications such as intracranial infection or neurological deficits were observed during the course of distraction osteogenesis. The osteogenesis generated at the distraction site was considerably satisfactory; and recurrence of the deformity in the follow-up period was minimal.
CONCLUSIONS: Distraction osteogenesis for craniofacial deformity has numerous advantages: 1) bone grafting is unnecessary; 2) the procedure is less invasive, has short operating time, and less blood loss occurs than in conventional craniofacial procedures; 3) no intracranial dead space is created; 4) there is a good amount of blood flow to the bone segment; and 5) soft-tissue expansion occurs. The authors believe that distraction osteogenesis is a versatile and stable option for the treatment of patients with craniosynostosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 16833252     DOI: 10.3171/foc.2000.9.3.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  8 in total

Review 1.  Posterior cranial vault expansion using distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Christopher A Derderian; Nicholas Bastidas; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Safety of Open Cranial Vault Surgery for Single-Suture Craniosynostosis: A Case for the Multidisciplinary Team.

Authors:  Craig B Birgfeld; Lynette Dufton; Heather Naumann; Richard A Hopper; Joseph S Gruss; Charles M Haberkern; Matthew L Speltz
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Relaxed pericranial flap for distraction osteogenesis to treat craniosynostosis: a technique for wound reinforcement--technical note.

Authors:  Kuniaki Nakahara; Shigehiro Ikemoto; Satoru Shimizu; Masaru Yamada; Toshihiro Kumabe
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 4.  Short- and Long-Term Outcomes by Procedure Type for Nonsagittal Single-Suture Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Katelyn G Bennett; Geoffrey E Hespe; Christian J Vercler; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 5.  Distraction osteogenesis in the surgical treatment of craniostenosis: a comparison of internal and external craniofacial distractor devices.

Authors:  S Pelo; G Gasparini; A Di Petrillo; G Tamburrini; C Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Management of exorbitism using midface distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Ahmed Alyamani; Peter Kessler; Sondos Abuzinada
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-05-26

7.  A bibliometric analysis of research on craniomaxillofacial distraction osteogenesis from 2000 to 2021.

Authors:  Zhen Liu; Jianying Yang; Changhan Zhou; Yao Liu; En Luo
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-01

8.  Monoblock craniofacial internal distraction in a child with Pfeiffer syndrome: a case report.

Authors:  Jaiho Chung; Dong Ha Park; Soo Han Yoon
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.153

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.