BACKGROUND: Microfracture of full-thickness articular defects has been shown to significantly enhance the amount of repair tissue. However, there is a suggestion that leaving calcified cartilage inhibits this repair response. HYPOTHESIS: Removal of the calcified cartilage with retention of subchondral bone enhances the amount of attachment of the repair tissue compared with retention of the calcified cartilage layer. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: There were 1-cm(2) articular cartilage defects made in 12 skeletally mature horses on the axial weightbearing portion of both medial femoral condyles. Using a custom measuring device and direct arthroscopic observation of the subchondral bone beneath the calcified cartilage layer, the authors removed the calcified cartilage from 1 defect of each horse. The repair was assessed with arthroscopy, clinical examination, radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging examinations, biopsy at 4 months, gross and histopathologic examinations at 12 months, as well as mRNA and immunohistochemical evaluations. RESULTS: Removal of calcified cartilage with retention of the subchondral bone plate increased the overall repair tissue as assessed by arthroscopic (4 months) and gross evaluation (12 months). An increase in the level of the subchondral bone was also observed with removal of the calcified cartilage layer. The clinical pain, radiographic examinations, magnetic resonance imaging evaluations, histologic character, matrix proteins, or mRNA expression do not appear to differ based on level of defect debridement. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Removal of the calcified cartilage layer appears to provide optimal amount and attachment of repair tissue. Therefore, close arthroscopic visualization is recommended for debridement of clinical lesions to ensure removal of the calcified cartilage layer.
BACKGROUND: Microfracture of full-thickness articular defects has been shown to significantly enhance the amount of repair tissue. However, there is a suggestion that leaving calcified cartilage inhibits this repair response. HYPOTHESIS: Removal of the calcified cartilage with retention of subchondral bone enhances the amount of attachment of the repair tissue compared with retention of the calcified cartilage layer. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: There were 1-cm(2) articular cartilage defects made in 12 skeletally mature horses on the axial weightbearing portion of both medial femoral condyles. Using a custom measuring device and direct arthroscopic observation of the subchondral bone beneath the calcified cartilage layer, the authors removed the calcified cartilage from 1 defect of each horse. The repair was assessed with arthroscopy, clinical examination, radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging examinations, biopsy at 4 months, gross and histopathologic examinations at 12 months, as well as mRNA and immunohistochemical evaluations. RESULTS: Removal of calcified cartilage with retention of the subchondral bone plate increased the overall repair tissue as assessed by arthroscopic (4 months) and gross evaluation (12 months). An increase in the level of the subchondral bone was also observed with removal of the calcified cartilage layer. The clinical pain, radiographic examinations, magnetic resonance imaging evaluations, histologic character, matrix proteins, or mRNA expression do not appear to differ based on level of defect debridement. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Removal of the calcified cartilage layer appears to provide optimal amount and attachment of repair tissue. Therefore, close arthroscopic visualization is recommended for debridement of clinical lesions to ensure removal of the calcified cartilage layer.
Authors: A H Gomoll; G Filardo; L de Girolamo; J Espregueira-Mendes; J Esprequeira-Mendes; M Marcacci; W G Rodkey; J R Steadman; R J Steadman; S Zaffagnini; E Kon Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2011-11-24 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Won C Bae; Jerry R Dwek; Richard Znamirowski; Sheronda M Statum; Juan C Hermida; Darryl D D'Lima; Robert L Sah; Jiang Du; Christine B Chung Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: John Theodoropoulos; Tim Dwyer; Daniel Whelan; Paul Marks; Mark Hurtig; Pankaj Sharma Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2012-02-24 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Marco Kawamura Demange; Tom Minas; Arvind von Keudell; Sonal Sodha; Tim Bryant; Andreas H Gomoll Journal: Cartilage Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 4.634