Literature DB >> 16831940

Advanced imaging assessment of bone quality.

Harry K Genant1, Yebin Jiang.   

Abstract

Noninvasive and/or nondestructive techniques can provide structural information about bone, beyond simple bone densitometry. While the latter provides important information about osteoporotic fracture risk, many studies indicate that bone mineral density (BMD) only partly explains bone strength. Quantitative assessment of macrostructural characteristics, such as geometry, and microstructural features, such as relative trabecular volume, trabecular spacing, and connectivity, may improve our ability to estimate bone strength. Methods for quantitatively assessing macrostructure include (besides conventional radiographs) dual X ray absorptiometry (DXA) and computed tomography (CT), particularly volumetric quantitative computed tomography (vQCT). Methods for assessing microstructure of trabecular bone noninvasively and/or nondestructively include high-resolution computed tomography (hrCT), microcomputed tomography (micro-CT), high-resolution magnetic resonance (hrMR), and micromagnetic resonance (micro-MR). vQCT, hrCT, and hrMR are generally applicable in vivo; micro-CT and micro-MR are principally applicable in vitro. Despite progress, problems remain. The important balances between spatial resolution and sampling size, or between signal-to-noise and radiation dose or acquisition time, need further consideration, as do the complexity and expense of the methods versus their availability and accessibility. Clinically, the challenges for bone imaging include balancing the advantages of simple bone densitometry versus the more complex architectural features of bone, or the deeper research requirements versus the broader clinical needs. The biological differences between the peripheral appendicular skeleton and the central axial skeleton must be further addressed. Finally, the relative merits of these sophisticated imaging techniques must be weighed with respect to their applications as diagnostic procedures, requiring high accuracy or reliability, versus their monitoring applications, requiring high precision or reproducibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16831940     DOI: 10.1196/annals.1346.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  30 in total

1.  Performance of μMRI-Based virtual bone biopsy for structural and mechanical analysis at the distal tibia at 7T field strength.

Authors:  Yusuf A Bhagat; Chamith S Rajapakse; Jeremy F Magland; James H Love; Alexander C Wright; Michael J Wald; Hee Kwon Song; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  In vivo magnetic resonance detects rapid remodeling changes in the topology of the trabecular bone network after menopause and the protective effect of estradiol.

Authors:  Felix W Wehrli; Glenn A Ladinsky; Catherine Jones; Maria Benito; Jeremy Magland; Branimir Vasilic; Andra M Popescu; Babette Zemel; Andrew J Cucchiara; Alexander C Wright; Hee K Song; Punam K Saha; Helen Peachey; Peter J Snyder
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  On the significance of motion degradation in high-resolution 3D μMRI of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Yusuf A Bhagat; Chamith S Rajapakse; Jeremy F Magland; Michael J Wald; Hee Kwon Song; Mary B Leonard; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Thy1 is a positive regulator of osteoblast differentiation and modulates bone homeostasis in obese mice.

Authors:  Ananta Paine; Collynn F Woeller; Hengwei Zhang; Maria de la Luz Garcia-Hernandez; Nelson Huertas; Lianping Xing; Richard P Phipps; Christopher T Ritchlin
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Bone quality: from bench to bedside: opening editorial comment.

Authors:  Adele L Boskey; Eve Donnelly; J Gregory Kinnett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Evaluation of perfusion-related and true diffusion in vertebral bone marrow: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Naoki Ohno; Tosiaki Miyati; Harumasa Kasai; Nobuyuki Arai; Makoto Kawano; Yuta Shibamoto; Satoshi Kobayashi; Toshifumi Gabata; Osamu Matsui
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-11-21

7.  Assessing fracture risk using gradient boosting machine (GBM) models.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Atkinson; Terry M Therneau; L Joseph Melton; Jon J Camp; Sara J Achenbach; Shreyasee Amin; Sundeep Khosta
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 8.  Bone density and young athletic women. An update.

Authors:  David L Nichols; Charlotte F Sanborn; Eve V Essery
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Spin-echo micro-MRI of trabecular bone using improved 3D fast large-angle spin-echo (FLASE).

Authors:  J F Magland; M J Wald; F W Wehrli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Assessment of bone fragility with clinical imaging modalities.

Authors:  Xn Dong; X Wang
Journal:  Hard Tissue       Date:  2013-02-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.