Literature DB >> 16831142

Prostate specific-antigen distribution in asymptomatic Canadian men with no clinical evidence of prostate cancer.

Felix K-H Chun1, Paul Perrotte, Alberto Briganti, Serge Benayoun, Thierry Lebeau, Alvaro Ramirez, Daniel J Lewinshtein, Luc Valiquette, Jean-Pierre Guay, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine prostate specific-antigen (PSA) levels and percentage free/total PSA (f/tPSA) distributions as well as digital rectal examination (DRE) profiles in asymptomatic Canadian men with no established prostate cancer diagnosis, as recent data indicate that a man's risk of developing prostate cancer is higher if his baseline PSA level is above the median for his age group. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We used data obtained during an early prostate cancer-detection event. An invitation to an onsite DRE, PSA level and f/tPSA assessment was accepted by 313 men. Serum PSA level and f/tPSA were measured before the DRE. A suspicious DRE and/or PSA level of > or = 2.5 ng/mL or f/tPSA of < or = 15% represented indications for a systematic 12-core ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy.
RESULTS: Of all the 313 men, most (235, 75%) had PSA levels of 0.01-1.53 ng/mL and an f/tPSA of >15% (285, 91.1%). The median (range) PSA level was 0.8 (0-34.2) ng/mL and f/tPSA was 27.4 (6.7-100)%. Age-specific median PSA levels and f/tPSA were, respectively, 0.7, 0.9, 1.0, 1.5 ng/mL and 31%, 27%, 26%, 25% for men aged 40-49, 50-59, 60-69 and 70-79 years. A suspicious DRE was recorded in 55 (17.6%) men, with eight (8.8%), 26 (20.0%), 14 (20.6%), and seven (28.9%) having suspicious DRE findings according to above age categories. Overall, seven (2.2%) prostate cancers were detected.
CONCLUSION: The median age-specific baseline PSA levels and f/tPSA represent valuable indicators of prostate cancer risk. The population-specific baseline median PSA level should not be >1.0 ng/mL and the baseline f/tPSA should be >30%. Men with values outside of these ranges should be considered at greater risk of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16831142     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06193.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  4 in total

1.  Confirmation of the HOXB13 G84E germline mutation in familial prostate cancer.

Authors:  Joan P Breyer; T Grant Avritt; Kate M McReynolds; William D Dupont; Jeffrey R Smith
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  [Movember health care initiative 2019: prostate cancer screening at the University Hospital Frankfurt].

Authors:  M Wenzel; C Humke; S Wicker; J Mani; T Engl; G Hintereder; T J Vogl; P Wild; J Köllermann; C Rödel; S Asgharie; L Theissen; M Welte; L A Kluth; P Mandel; F K H Chun; F Preisser; A Becker
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Multiparametric MRI may Help to Identify Patients With Prostate Cancer in a Contemporary Cohort of Patients With Clinical Bladder Outlet Obstruction Scheduled for Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP).

Authors:  Mike Wenzel; Maria N Welte; Lina Grossmann; Felix Preisser; Lena H Theissen; Clara Humke; Marina Deuker; Simon Bernatz; Philipp Gild; Sascha Ahyai; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Boris Bodelle; Luis A Kluth; Felix K H Chun; Philipp Mandel; Andreas Becker
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-02-25

4.  Cancer screening: a mathematical model relating secreted blood biomarker levels to tumor sizes.

Authors:  Amelie M Lutz; Juergen K Willmann; Frank V Cochran; Pritha Ray; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 11.069

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.