Literature DB >> 16830342

Indicators of the maximum radiation dose to the skin during percutaneous coronary intervention in different target vessels.

Koichi Chida1, Haruo Saito, Yutaka Kagaya, Masahiro Kohzuki, Yoshihiro Takai, Shoki Takahashi, Shogo Yamada, Masayuki Zuguchi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the maximum radiation dose to the patient's skin (MSD) can be estimated during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures, we investigated the relationship between the MSD and fluoroscopic time, dose-area product (DAP), and body weight, separately analyzing the relationships for different target vessels.
BACKGROUND: Many cases of skin injury caused by excessive radiation exposure during cardiac intervention procedures have been reported. However, real-time maximum-dose monitoring of the skin is unavailable for many cardiac intervention procedures.
METHODS: We studied 197 consecutive PCI procedures that involved a single target vessel and were conducted. The DAP was measured, and the MSD was calculated by a skin-dose mapping software program (Caregraph). The target vessels of the PCI procedures were divided into four groups based on the AHA classification system: AHA 5-10, left anterior descending artery domain (LAD), AHA 11-15, left circumflex artery domain (LCx), AHA 1-3 = R 1-3, and AHA 4 = R 4.
RESULTS: The correlation coefficient (r) between the MSD and fluoroscopic time was higher for the right coronary artery (RCA) vessels (R 1-3, 0.852; R 4, 0.715) than for the left coronary artery (LCA) vessels (LAD, 0.527; LCx, 0.646), and the r value between the MSD and DAP was higher for the RCA vessels (R 1-3, 0.871; R 4, 0.898) than for the LCA vessels (LAD, 0.628; LCx, 0.694). Similarly, the correlation coefficient between the MSD and weight x fluoroscopic time (WFP) was higher for the RCA vessels (R 1-3, 0.874; R 4, 0.807) than for the LCA vessels (LAD, 0.551; LCx, 0.735).
CONCLUSIONS: The DAP and WFP can be used to estimate the MSD during PCI in the RCA but not in the LCA, especially the LAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16830342     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  5 in total

1.  Evaluating the performance of a MOSFET dosimeter at diagnostic X-ray energies for interventional radiology.

Authors:  Koichi Chida; Youhei Inaba; Hanako Masuyama; Isao Yanagawa; Issei Mori; Haruo Saito; Shin Maruoka; Masayuki Zuguchi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2008-11-15

Review 2.  What are useful methods to reduce occupational radiation exposure among radiological medical workers, especially for interventional radiology personnel?

Authors:  Koichi Chida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  Risk Factors For Radiation-Induced Skin Ulceration in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of Chronic Total Occluded Lesions: A 2-Year Observational Study.

Authors:  Chi-Cheng Lai; Kai-Che Wei; Wen-Yee Chen; Guang-Yuan Mar; Wen-Hwa Wang; Chieh-Shan Wu; Ching-Jiunn Tseng; Kuo-Chung Yang; Lee-Wei Chen; Chun-Peng Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Direct measurement of a patient's entrance skin dose during pediatric cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Lue Sun; Yusuke Mizuno; Mari Iwamoto; Takahisa Goto; Yasuhiro Koguchi; Yuka Miyamoto; Koji Tsuboi; Koichi Chida; Takashi Moritake
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Validation of a novel stand-alone software tool for image guided cardiac catheter therapy.

Authors:  René van Es; Hans T van den Broek; Mira van der Naald; Leon de Jong; Eliane R Nieuwenhuis; Adriaan O Kraaijeveld; Pieter A Doevendans; Steven A J Chamuleau; Frebus J van Slochteren
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.357

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.