Literature DB >> 16830172

Estimating dietary intakes from a brief questionnaire: A simulation study of reliability in a molecular epidemiologic study of pancreatic and biliary diseases.

Michelle A Mendez1, Jesús Vioque, Miquel Porta, Eva Morales, Tomàs López, Núria Malats, Marta Crous, Luis I Gómez.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Brief dietary questionnaires may be useful in research or clinical settings where in-depth assessments are inefficient or impractical. We conducted a simulation study to assess the reliability of a brief food frequency questionnaire (bFFQ) for capturing dietary intakes relative to a detailed survey. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The bFFQ was used in a study of patients with pancreatic and biliary diseases in eastern Spain (n = 605). The structured interview included a section probing the frequency of intakes of 14 food groups, using 4 response categories. Data from a 93-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (SFFQ) with 9 response categories (n = 1337) was used to: (1) develop estimates of nutrient intakes for each food group, and (2) to simulate how intakes would have been estimated using the bFFQ. The simulation allowed to assess effects of aggregating foods and using abbreviated frequency categories.
RESULTS: Correlations between actual and simulated intake frequencies exceeded 0.70 for 10 food groups; modest correlations (0.43-0.56) were observed for groups assessed less well using abbreviated frequency categories. Correlations exceeded 0.60 for most nutrients. Concordance was lower for several nutrients, notably retinol, for which substantial proportions were contributed by groups combining foods with highly variable levels of these compounds.
CONCLUSIONS: Intake estimates from the bFFQ may be useful in exploratory analyses of the role of diet in bilio-pancreatic diseases and related etiopathogenic events. Estimates for some nutrients may be less reliable, and should be interpreted with particular caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16830172     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-006-9020-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  32 in total

1.  Association between coffee drinking and K-ras mutations in exocrine pancreatic cancer. PANKRAS II Study Group.

Authors:  M Porta; N Malats; L Guarner; A Carrato; J Rifà; A Salas; J M Corominas; M Andreu; F X Real
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Measurement of past diet: review of previous and proposed methods.

Authors:  C M Friedenreich; N Slimani; E Riboli
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 3.  Brief, validated survey instruments for the measurement of fruit and vegetable intakes in adults: a review.

Authors:  Daniel J Kim; Eric J Holowaty
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Exocrine pancreatic cancer: symptoms at presentation and their relation to tumour site and stage.

Authors:  Miquel Porta; Xavier Fabregat; Núria Malats; Luisa Guarner; Alfredo Carrato; Ana de Miguel; Laura Ruiz; Manuel Jariod; Sergi Costafreda; Susana Coll; Juan Alguacil; Josep M Corominas; Ricard Solà; Antonio Salas; Francisco X Real
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Associations between dietary intake and Ki-ras mutations in colon tumors: a population-based study.

Authors:  M L Slattery; K Curtin; K Anderson; K N Ma; S Edwards; M Leppert; J Potter; D Schaffer; W S Samowitz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Validity of short food frequency questionnaires used in cancer chemoprevention trials: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  M L Neuhouser; A R Kristal; D McLerran; R E Patterson; J Atkinson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  A 7-item versus 31-item food frequency questionnaire for measuring fruit, juice, and vegetable intake among a predominantly African-American population.

Authors:  C L Warneke; M Davis; C De Moor; T Baranowski
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2001-07

8.  Usefulness of a short food frequency questionnaire for screening of low intake of fruit and vegetable and for intake of fat.

Authors:  Lene F Andersen; Lars Johansson; Kari Solvoll
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.367

9.  Are imprecise methods obscuring a relation between fat and breast cancer?

Authors:  Sheila A Bingham; Robert Luben; Ailsa Welch; Nicholas Wareham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Nicholas Day
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-07-19       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Performance of a short tool to assess dietary intakes of fruits and vegetables, percentage energy from fat and fibre.

Authors:  Frances E Thompson; Douglas Midthune; Amy F Subar; Lisa L Kahle; Arthur Schatzkin; Victor Kipnis
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.022

View more
  3 in total

1.  Timing of blood extraction in epidemiologic and proteomic studies: results and proposals from the PANKRAS II Study.

Authors:  Miquel Porta; José Pumarega; Olga Ferrer-Armengou; Tomàs López; Joan Alguacil; Núria Malats; Esteve Fernàndez
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Food and nutrient intakes and K-ras mutations in exocrine pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Eva Morales; Miquel Porta; Jesús Vioque; Tomás López; Michelle A Mendez; José Pumarega; Núria Malats; Marta Crous-Bou; Joy Ngo; Juli Rifà; Alfredo Carrato; Luisa Guarner; Josep M Corominas; Francisco X Real
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  Derivatives of Plastics as Potential Carcinogenic Factors: The Current State of Knowledge.

Authors:  Jacek Baj; James Curtis Dring; Marcin Czeczelewski; Paweł Kozyra; Alicja Forma; Jolanta Flieger; Beata Kowalska; Grzegorz Buszewicz; Grzegorz Teresiński
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 6.575

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.