Literature DB >> 16830125

[Desflurane and isoflurane in minimal-flow anesthesia. Consumption and costs with forced fresh gas reduction].

H Buchinger1, S Kreuer, M Paxian, R Larsen, W Wilhelm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the present investigation we compared the consumption of desflurane (DES) and isoflurane (ISO) using a standardized minimal-flow protocol with a forced reduction of the fresh gas flow (FGF).
METHODS: 54 adult women were examined. After induction of anaesthesia a forced reduction of the FGF was started: 5 min 0.5 l/min O(2) + 1 l/min N(2)O, 10 min 0.5 l/min O(2) + 0.5 l/min N(2)O; finally 0.3 l/min O(2) + 0.2 l/min N(2)O up to the end of surgery. The consumption of DES/ISO was determined with a precision balance.
RESULTS: In the DES group the uptake was around 0.3 vol-%, i.e. less than 8% of the target 2/3 MAC value was taken up. For ISO the uptake was around 0.25 vol-%, i.e. the uptake was approximately 30% of the target 2/3-MAC value. The DES consumption was after 60 min 17.0+/-1.1 g, 120 min--27.3+/-1.8 g and 180 min--36.5+/-1.7 g. ISO consumption was significantly lower: 7.6+/-0.8 g, 12.4+/-1.7 g and 15.5+/-1.6 g. The use of DES yielded higher costs, i.e. 2.28 EUR for 60 min, 3.63 EUR for 120 min and 4.97 EUR for 180 min. The consumption of the inhaled anaesthetics can be calculated as: DES (g)=4.84+0.184 x duration (min) (R(2)=0.981), ISO (g)=2.049+0.0826 x duration (R(2)=0.979). The costs are: DES (EUR)=0.85+0.0323 x duration (min); ISO (EUR)=0.19+0.0077 x duration (min).
CONCLUSION: With a forced reduction of the FGF the DES consumption is still higher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16830125     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-006-1059-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  15 in total

1.  The administration of nitrous oxide-oxygen anesthesia in closed systems.

Authors:  F F FOLDES; A J CERAVOLO; S L CARPENTER
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1952-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  The rate of uptake of nitrous oxide in man.

Authors:  J W SEVERINGHAUS
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1954-09       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  [Low-flow anesthesia with desflurane].

Authors:  J Baum; M Berghoff; H G Stanke; M Petermeyer; G Kalff
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  Low-flow anaesthesia.

Authors:  J A Baum; A R Aitkenhead
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 5.  [Low flow anesthesia].

Authors:  J Baum
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Comparing the costs of inhaled anesthetics.

Authors:  R B Weiskopf; E I Eger
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Recovery profile after desflurane-nitrous oxide versus isoflurane-nitrous oxide in outpatients.

Authors:  A F Ghouri; M Bodner; P F White
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Anaesthesia with desflurane-nitrous oxide in elderly patients. Comparison with isoflurane-nitrous oxide.

Authors:  M Solca; I Salvo; R Russo; R Fiori; G Veschi
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Cost comparison: a desflurane- versus a propofol-based general anesthetic technique.

Authors:  M K Rosenberg; P Bridge; M Brown
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  [Narcotrend stages and end-tidal desflurane concentrations. An investigation during recovery from desflurane/remifentanil anaesthesia].

Authors:  S Kreuer; G Molter; A Biedler; R Larsen; S Schoth; W Wilhelm
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.041

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of minimal-flow sevoflurane versus desflurane anesthesia: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Berna Ayanoğlu Taş; Ceren Şanlı Karip; Süheyla Abitağaoğlu; Mehmet Celal Öztürk; Dilek Erdoğan Arı
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-06-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.